IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02990807.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multi-label classification of member participation in online innovation communities

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Debaere
  • Kristof Coussement

    (LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Tom de Ruyck

Abstract

Online innovation communities are defined as internet-based platforms for communication and exchange among customers interested in building innovations for a given product or technology. As firms recognize an online innovation community as a valuable resource for integrating external consumer knowledge into innovation processes, they increasingly ignore to build long-term interactions and collaborations. However, in the pursuit of a long-term community, moderators face enormous challenges, especially due to inferior member participation. Inferior member participation, whether in the form of inferior participation quantity, quality and/or emotionality, produces a community with minimal activity, unhelpful content and a nonconstructive atmosphere, respectively. Because members can be associated with multiple labels of inferior participation behavior simultaneously, the paradigm of multi-label (ML) classification methodology naturally emerges, which associates each member of interest with a set of labels instead of a single label as known in traditional classification problems. Using 1407 members of 7 real-life innovation communities, this study explores 10 state-of-the-art ML algorithms in an extensive experimental comparison to explore the benefit of ML classification methodology. We advance literature by demonstrating a novel application for ML classification adoption in the domain of online innovation communities, while comparing ML classifiers in the smallest possible scenario of 3 labels. The results indicate the effectiveness of the ML classification methodology for inferior member participation prediction, gives insights into ML classifiers' performance and discusses paths for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Debaere & Kristof Coussement & Tom de Ruyck, 2018. "Multi-label classification of member participation in online innovation communities," Post-Print hal-02990807, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02990807
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.03.039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Phillip H. & Kotha, Reddi & Fourné, Sebastian P.L. & Coussement, Kristof, 2019. "Taking leaps of faith: Evaluation criteria and resource commitments for early-stage inventions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1429-1444.
    2. Ni, Ji & Chen, Bowei & Allinson, Nigel M. & Ye, Xujiong, 2020. "A hybrid model for predicting human physical activity status from lifelogging data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(3), pages 532-542.
    3. Gupta, Mukul & Kumar, Pradeep, 2020. "Recommendation generation using personalized weight of meta-paths in heterogeneous information networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 660-674.
    4. Steven Debaere & Floris Devriendt & Johanna Brunneder & Wouter Verbeke & Tom de Ruyck & Kristof Coussement, 2019. "Reducing inferior member community participation using uplift modeling: Evidence from a field experiment," Post-Print hal-02990787, HAL.
    5. Bogaert, Matthias & Lootens, Justine & Van den Poel, Dirk & Ballings, Michel, 2019. "Evaluating multi-label classifiers and recommender systems in the financial service sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 620-634.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02990807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.