IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v16y2016i1d10.1007_s10660-015-9209-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do social-based cues influence consumers’ online purchase decisions? An event-related potential study

Author

Listed:
  • Qiuzhen Wang

    (Zhejiang University)

  • Liang Meng

    (Zhejiang University)

  • Manlu Liu

    (Rochester Institute of Technology)

  • Qi Wang

    (NetEase, Inc)

  • Qingguo Ma

    (Zhejiang University)

Abstract

Product rating and sales are two important social-based cues in online shopping. This study applies the event-related potential (ERP) approach to explore the underlying neural mechanism of the joint influence of these two cues on consumers’ decision-making. Behavioral data show that product rating has a greater impact on the purchasing rate than sales, which positively moderates the latter’s effect and supports cue-diagnosticity theory. Electrophysiological data provide further explanations for the observed behavioral pattern. Analyses of main ERP components suggest that consumers go through a series of cognitive processes from processing of perceived risk (N2) and informational conflict (N400) to evaluative categorization (LPP) before making the final purchasing decision. Specifically, product rating significantly influences the risk perception while the combination of high rating and low sales elicits significant cognitive conflict. Both cues are adopted by consumers to make an overall evaluation based on their similarity to the criterion.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiuzhen Wang & Liang Meng & Manlu Liu & Qi Wang & Qingguo Ma, 2016. "How do social-based cues influence consumers’ online purchase decisions? An event-related potential study," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:16:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10660-015-9209-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-015-9209-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-015-9209-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-015-9209-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nanda Kumar & Izak Benbasat, 2006. "Research Note: The Influence of Recommendations and Consumer Reviews on Evaluations of Websites," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 425-439, December.
    2. Daniel Kahneman & Jack L. Knetsch & Richard H. Thaler, 1991. "Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 193-206, Winter.
    3. D. Veena Parboteeah & Joseph S. Valacich & John D. Wells, 2009. "The Influence of Website Characteristics on a Consumer's Urge to Buy Impulsively," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 60-78, March.
    4. Anthony D. Miyazaki & Dhruv Grewal & Ronald C. Goodstein, 2005. "The Effect of Multiple Extrinsic Cues on Quality Perceptions: A Matter of Consistency," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(1), pages 146-153, June.
    5. Petty, Richard E & Cacioppo, John T & Schumann, David, 1983. "Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 135-146, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Cuicui & Li, Yiyang & Fu, Weizhong & Jin, Jia, 2023. "Whether to trust chatbots: Applying the event-related approach to understand consumers’ emotional experiences in interactions with chatbots in e-commerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Tibert Verhagen & Daniel Bloemers, 2018. "Exploring the cognitive and affective bases of online purchase intentions: a hierarchical test across product types," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 537-561, September.
    3. Wenyi Wang & Qiang Guo, 2023. "Subscription strategy choices of network video platforms in the presence of social influence," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 577-604, March.
    4. Liang Xiao & Feipeng Guo & Fumao Yu & Shengnan Liu, 2019. "The Effects of Online Shopping Context Cues on Consumers’ Purchase Intention for Cross-Border E-Commerce Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Dong Lv & Rui Sun & Qiuhua Zhu & Jiajia Zuo & Shukun Qin, 2024. "Sustainable Impact of Stance Attribution Design Cues for Robots on Human–Robot Relationships—Evidence from the ERSP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Qiang Wei & Dong Lv & Yixin Lin & Dongmei Zhu & Siyuan Liu & Yuting Liu, 2023. "Influence of Utilitarian and Hedonic Attributes on Willingness to Pay Green Product Premiums and Neural Mechanisms in China: An ERP Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Yu, Haihong & Liang, Yongchong & Wang, Ailian & Fan, Qi & Jin, Jia, 2022. "Pay online or pay on delivery? An ERP study of how payment methods affect online purchase decisions for search vs. experience products," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Yajie Hu & Huiwen Zhou & Yuangao Chen & Jianrong Yao & Jiangwu Su, 2023. "The influence of patient-generated reviews and doctor-patient relationship on online consultations in China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1115-1141, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Hong & Zhao, Ling & Gupta, Sumeet, 2018. "The role of online product recommendations on customer decision making and loyalty in social shopping communities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 150-166.
    2. Li, Hui & Xu, Yunjie & Huang, Lihua, 2021. "When less is more? The contingent effect of product supply limitation in the release of new electronic products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Tibert Verhagen & Daniel Bloemers, 2018. "Exploring the cognitive and affective bases of online purchase intentions: a hierarchical test across product types," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 537-561, September.
    4. Wang, Qiuzhen & Cui, Xiling & Huang, Liqiang & Dai, Yiling, 2016. "Seller reputation or product presentation? An empirical investigation from cue utilization perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 271-283.
    5. Thomas Friedrich & Sebastian Schlauderer & Sven Overhage, 2021. "Some things are just better rich: how social commerce feature richness affects consumers’ buying intention via social factors," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 159-180, March.
    6. Nirmal Acharya & Anne-Marie Sassenberg & Jeffrey Soar, 2023. "The Role of Cognitive Absorption in Recommender System Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Hu, Xi & Huang, Qian & Zhong, Xuepan & Davison, Robert M. & Zhao, Dingtao, 2016. "The influence of peer characteristics and technical features of a social shopping website on a consumer’s purchase intention," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1218-1230.
    8. Gao, Lingling & Bai, Xuesong, 2014. "Online consumer behaviour and its relationship to website atmospheric induced flow: Insights into online travel agencies in China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 653-665.
    9. Caroline Ardelet & Bérangère Brial, 2011. "Influence des recommandations d'internautes: le role de la presence sociale et de l'expertise," Post-Print hal-01258971, HAL.
    10. Randall Holcombe, 2009. "The behavioral foundations of Austrian economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 22(4), pages 301-313, December.
    11. Philippe Fevrier & Sebastien Gay, 2005. "Informed Consent Versus Presumed Consent The Role of the Family in Organ Donations," HEW 0509007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Lisa A. Robinson & James K. Hammitt, 2011. "Behavioral Economics and Regulatory Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(9), pages 1408-1422, September.
    13. Wiebke Roß & Jens Weghake, 2018. "Wa(h)re Liebe: Was Online-Dating-Plattformen über zweiseitige Märkte lehren," TUC Working Papers in Economics 0017, Abteilung für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Clausthal (Department of Economics, Technical University Clausthal).
    14. Del Barrio-García, Salvador & Kamakura, Wagner A. & Luque-Martínez, Teodoro, 2019. "A Longitudinal Cross-product Analysis of Media-budget Allocations: How Economic and Technological Disruptions Affected Media Choices Across Industries," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-15.
    15. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ballester, 2009. "A theory of reference-dependent behavior," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(3), pages 427-455, September.
    16. Martin P. Fritze & Andreas B. Eisingerich & Martin Benkenstein, 2019. "Digital transformation and possession attachment: examining the endowment effect for consumers’ relationships with hedonic and utilitarian digital service technologies," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 311-337, June.
    17. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "How endogenous risk preferences and sample selection affect analysis of firm survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1309-1332, April.
    18. A. Banerji & Jeevant Rampal, 2020. "Reverse Endowment Effect for a New Product," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 786-805, May.
    19. Tian, Ye & Chiu, Yi-Chang & Sun, Jian, 2019. "Understanding behavioral effects of tradable mobility credit scheme: An experimental economics approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-11.
    20. Xingrong Hou & Jianmin Zeng & Hong Chen & Li Su, 2019. "The endowment effect in the genes: An exploratory study," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(3), pages 293-298, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:16:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10660-015-9209-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.