IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/decisn/v46y2019i1d10.1007_s40622-019-0201-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-deceptive deliberate purchase of brand lookalikes: a BOP customer value perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ramendra Singh

    (IIM Calcutta)

  • Sangeeta Trott

    (MIDC)

Abstract

In this article, we unravel new insights about how bottom of pyramid (BOP) consumers derive value through purchase and consumption of deliberate lookalike brands. We analyse in-depth interview data of 12 BOP consumers and 8 BOP retailers from Mumbai, India, related to purchase and sales of counterfeit brands. Our results suggest three different themes that constitute the BOP customers’ value model for deliberate counterfeit purchases: (1) cost–benefit analysis, (2) status symbol, and (3) value for money. Our research provides fresh insights of how BOP consumers derive various aspects of value by balancing risks and returns from purchase of counterfeits, while also using these goods as status symbols. The managerial relevance of the research lies in leveraging BOP consumer insights on the value perceived in the use of deliberate lookalike brands, and how the customer value is embedded in BOP socio-economic context, which firms can leverage to tailor their communications to these segments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramendra Singh & Sangeeta Trott, 2019. "Non-deceptive deliberate purchase of brand lookalikes: a BOP customer value perspective," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 46(1), pages 15-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:decisn:v:46:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40622-019-0201-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40622-019-0201-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40622-019-0201-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40622-019-0201-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nwankwo, Sonny & Hamelin, Nicolas & Khaled, Meryem, 2014. "Consumer values, motivation and purchase intention for luxury goods," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 735-744.
    2. Bian, Xuemei & Moutinho, Luiz, 2009. "An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 368-378, March.
    3. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    4. Grossman, Gene M & Shapiro, Carl, 1988. "Counterfeit-Product Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(1), pages 59-75, March.
    5. Abhijit V. Banerjee & Esther Duflo, 2007. "The Economic Lives of the Poor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(1), pages 141-168, Winter.
    6. Richins, Marsha L, 1994. "Valuing Things: The Public and Private Meanings of Possessions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 504-521, December.
    7. Thompson, Craig J & Locander, William B & Pollio, Howard R, 1990. "The Lived Meaning of Free Choice: An Existential-Phenomenological Description of Everyday Consumer Experiences of Contemporary Married Women," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(3), pages 346-361, December.
    8. Luuk Van Kempen, 2004. "Are the poor willing to pay a premium for designer labels? a field experiment in Bolivia," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 205-224.
    9. Andrew B. Trigg, 2001. "Veblen, Bourdieu, and Conspicuous Consumption," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 99-115, March.
    10. Franses & Madesta Lede, 2015. "Cultural norms and values and purchases of counterfeits," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(54), pages 5902-5916, November.
    11. Angela Fontes & Jessie Fan, 2006. "The Effects of Ethnic Identity on Household Budget Allocation to Status Conveying Goods," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 643-663, December.
    12. Poddar, Amit & Foreman, Jeff & Banerjee, Syagnik (Sy) & Ellen, Pam Scholder, 2012. "Exploring the Robin Hood effect: Moral profiteering motives for purchasing counterfeit products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 1500-1506.
    13. Wendy Wan & Chung-Leung Luk & Oliver Yau & Alan Tse & Leo Sin & Kenneth Kwong & Raymond Chow, 2009. "Do Traditional Chinese Cultural Values Nourish a Market for Pirated CDs?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 185-196, April.
    14. Thaichon, Park & Quach, Sara, 2016. "Dark motives-counterfeit purchase framework: Internal and external motives behind counterfeit purchase via digital platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 82-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Srivastava, Abhinav & Mukherjee, Srabanti & Jebarajakirthy, Charles, 2020. "Aspirational consumption at the bottom of pyramid: A review of literature and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 246-259.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaufmann, Hans Ruediger & Petrovici, Dan Alex & Filho, Cid Gonçalves & Ayres, Adriano, 2016. "Identifying moderators of brand attachment for driving customer purchase intention of original vs counterfeits of luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5735-5747.
    2. Bian, Xuemei & Wang, Kai-Yu & Smith, Andrew & Yannopoulou, Natalia, 2016. "New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4249-4258.
    3. Randhawa, Praneet & Calantone, Roger J. & Voorhees, Clay M., 2015. "The pursuit of counterfeited luxury: An examination of the negative side effects of close consumer–brand connections," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2395-2403.
    4. Islam, Tahir & Pitafi, Abdul Hameed & Akhtar, Naeem & Xiaobei, Liang, 2021. "Determinants of purchase luxury counterfeit products in social commerce: The mediating role of compulsive internet use," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Thaichon, Park & Quach, Sara, 2016. "Dark motives-counterfeit purchase framework: Internal and external motives behind counterfeit purchase via digital platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 82-91.
    6. Srivastava, Abhinav & Mukherjee, Srabanti & Jebarajakirthy, Charles, 2020. "Aspirational consumption at the bottom of pyramid: A review of literature and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 246-259.
    7. Truong, Yann & McColl, Rod, 2011. "Intrinsic motivations, self-esteem, and luxury goods consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 555-561.
    8. Song, Lei & Meng, Yan & Chang, Hua & Li, Wenjing & Tan (Frank), Kang, 2021. "How counterfeit dominance affects luxury fashion brand owners’ perceptions: A cross-cultural examination," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Alexander Davidson & Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno & Michel Laroche, 2019. "Shame on You: When Materialism Leads to Purchase Intentions Toward Counterfeit Products," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 479-494, March.
    10. Sirui Li & Ying Liu & Jing Su & Litao Duan & Hui Fu, 2024. "Men resist men: streamer-consumer gender match for advertising the functional benefits of heterogeneously priced utilitarian products," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Shan, Juan & Jiang, Ling & Cui, Annie Peng, 2021. "A double-edged sword: How the dual characteristics of face motivate and prevent counterfeit luxury consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 59-69.
    12. Correia, Antónia & Kozak, Metin, 2016. "Tourists' shopping experiences at street markets: Cross-country research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 85-95.
    13. Martin Ravallion & Shaohua Chen, 2011. "Weakly Relative Poverty," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(4), pages 1251-1261, November.
    14. Aysel Kurnaz, 2017. "Examination of the Relationship between Luxury Value Perception and Shopping Motivations: Turkey Sample," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(5), pages 108-124, October.
    15. Inès, Gicquel & Herbert, Castéran, 2016. "Linking usage and shopping: How value experiences can distinguish consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 165-174.
    16. Bee Eng Chew & Azaze-Azizi Abdul Adis, 2018. "A Study on Malaysian Consumers¡¯ Attitude and Behavioral Intention Towards Print Advertising," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 132-150, June.
    17. Jiahan Li & Mahsa Ghaffari & Lin Su, 2020. "Counterfeit luxury consumption strategies in a collectivistic culture: the case of China," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(5), pages 546-560, September.
    18. Weiting Wang & Yi Liao & Wenjing Shen, 2023. "The Impact of Online Anti-Counterfeiting on Channel Structure and Pricing Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Priporas, Constantinos-Vasilios & Chen, Yan & Zhao, Shasha & Tan, Hui, 2020. "An exploratory study of the upper middle-class consumer attitudes towards counterfeiting in China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    20. Lacœuilhe, Jérôme & Louis, Didier & Lombart, Cindy, 2017. "Impacts of product, store and retailer perceptions on consumers’ relationship to terroir store brand," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 43-53.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:decisn:v:46:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40622-019-0201-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.