IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v89y2024i2d10.1007_s10589-024-00591-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eigenvalue programming beyond matrices

Author

Listed:
  • Masaru Ito

    (Nihon University)

  • Bruno F. Lourenço

    (Institute of Statistical Mathematics)

Abstract

In this paper we analyze and solve eigenvalue programs, which consist of the task of minimizing a function subject to constraints on the “eigenvalues” of the decision variable. Here, by making use of the FTvN systems framework introduced by Gowda, we interpret “eigenvalues” in a broad fashion going beyond the usual eigenvalues of matrices. This allows us to shed new light on classical problems such as inverse eigenvalue problems and also leads to new applications. In particular, after analyzing and developing a simple projected gradient algorithm for general eigenvalue programs, we show that eigenvalue programs can be used to express what we call vanishing quadratic constraints. A vanishing quadratic constraint requires that a given system of convex quadratic inequalities be satisfied and at least a certain number of those inequalities must be tight. As a particular case, this includes the problem of finding a point x in the intersection of m ellipsoids in such a way that x is also in the boundary of at least $$\ell $$ ℓ of the ellipsoids, for some fixed $$\ell > 0$$ ℓ > 0 . At the end, we also present some numerical experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Masaru Ito & Bruno F. Lourenço, 2024. "Eigenvalue programming beyond matrices," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 361-384, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:89:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10589-024-00591-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-024-00591-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-024-00591-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-024-00591-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen Chen & Ting Kei Pong & Lulin Tan & Liaoyuan Zeng, 2020. "A difference-of-convex approach for split feasibility with applications to matrix factorizations and outlier detection," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 107-136, September.
    2. Pierre Frankel & Guillaume Garrigos & Juan Peypouquet, 2015. "Splitting Methods with Variable Metric for Kurdyka–Łojasiewicz Functions and General Convergence Rates," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 874-900, June.
    3. Adrian S. Lewis & Jérôme Malick, 2008. "Alternating Projections on Manifolds," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 216-234, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radu Ioan Bot & Dang-Khoa Nguyen, 2020. "The Proximal Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers in the Nonconvex Setting: Convergence Analysis and Rates," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 682-712, May.
    2. Hao Wang & Hao Zeng & Jiashan Wang, 2022. "An extrapolated iteratively reweighted $$\ell _1$$ ℓ 1 method with complexity analysis," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 967-997, December.
    3. Maryam Yashtini, 2022. "Convergence and rate analysis of a proximal linearized ADMM for nonconvex nonsmooth optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 913-939, December.
    4. Francisco J. Aragón Artacho & Rubén Campoy, 2018. "A new projection method for finding the closest point in the intersection of convex sets," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 99-132, January.
    5. Silvia Bonettini & Peter Ochs & Marco Prato & Simone Rebegoldi, 2023. "An abstract convergence framework with application to inertial inexact forward–backward methods," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 319-362, March.
    6. Emilie Chouzenoux & Jean-Christophe Pesquet & Audrey Repetti, 2016. "A block coordinate variable metric forward–backward algorithm," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 457-485, November.
    7. J. X. Cruz Neto & P. R. Oliveira & A. Soubeyran & J. C. O. Souza, 2020. "A generalized proximal linearized algorithm for DC functions with application to the optimal size of the firm problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 313-339, June.
    8. Peter Ochs, 2018. "Local Convergence of the Heavy-Ball Method and iPiano for Non-convex Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 153-180, April.
    9. S. Bonettini & M. Prato & S. Rebegoldi, 2018. "A block coordinate variable metric linesearch based proximal gradient method," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 5-52, September.
    10. Masoud Ahookhosh & Le Thi Khanh Hien & Nicolas Gillis & Panagiotis Patrinos, 2021. "A Block Inertial Bregman Proximal Algorithm for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Problems with Application to Symmetric Nonnegative Matrix Tri-Factorization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 234-258, July.
    11. Nguyen Hieu Thao, 2018. "A convergent relaxation of the Douglas–Rachford algorithm," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 841-863, July.
    12. D. Russell Luke & Nguyen H. Thao & Matthew K. Tam, 2018. "Quantitative Convergence Analysis of Iterated Expansive, Set-Valued Mappings," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 1143-1176, November.
    13. Hédy Attouch & Jérôme Bolte & Patrick Redont & Antoine Soubeyran, 2010. "Proximal Alternating Minimization and Projection Methods for Nonconvex Problems: An Approach Based on the Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz Inequality," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 438-457, May.
    14. David Salas & Lionel Thibault, 2019. "On Characterizations of Submanifolds via Smoothness of the Distance Function in Hilbert Spaces," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 189-210, July.
    15. Franck Iutzeler & Jérôme Malick, 2018. "On the Proximal Gradient Algorithm with Alternated Inertia," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 688-710, March.
    16. Yingnan Wang & Naihua Xiu, 2011. "Strong Semismoothness of Projection onto Slices of Second-Order Cone," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 599-614, September.
    17. Yaohua Hu & Chong Li & Kaiwen Meng & Xiaoqi Yang, 2021. "Linear convergence of inexact descent method and inexact proximal gradient algorithms for lower-order regularization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(4), pages 853-883, April.
    18. Jean-Baptiste Hiriart-Urruty & Jérôme Malick, 2012. "A Fresh Variational-Analysis Look at the Positive Semidefinite Matrices World," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 551-577, June.
    19. Lei Yang, 2024. "Proximal Gradient Method with Extrapolation and Line Search for a Class of Non-convex and Non-smooth Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 68-103, January.
    20. Szilárd Csaba László, 2023. "A Forward–Backward Algorithm With Different Inertial Terms for Structured Non-Convex Minimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(1), pages 387-427, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:89:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10589-024-00591-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.