IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v64y2016i3d10.1007_s10589-016-9831-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local convex hulls for a special class of integer multicommodity flow problems

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiyuan Lin

    (University of Leeds)

  • Raymond S. K. Kwan

    (University of Leeds)

Abstract

Based on previous work in rolling stock scheduling problems (Alfieri et al. in Transp Sci 40:378–391, 2006; Cacchiani et al. in Math Progr B 124:207–231, 2010; Lin and Kwan in Electron Notes Discret Math 41:165–172, 2013; Schrijver in CWI Q 6:205–217, 1993; Ziarati et al. in Manag Sci 45:1156–1168, 1999), we generalize a local convex hull method for a class of integer multicommodity flow problems, and discuss its feasibility range in high dimensional cases. Suppose a local convex hull can be divided into an up hull, a main hull and a down hull if certain conditions are met, it is shown theoretically that the main hull can only have at most two nonzero facets. The numbers of points in the up and down hull are explored mainly on an empirical basis. The above properties of local convex hulls have led to a slightly modified QuickHull algorithm (the “2-facet QuickHull”) based on the original version proposed by Barber et al. (ACM Trans Math Softw 22:469–483, 1996). As for the feasibility in applying this method to rolling stock scheduling, our empirical experiments show that for the problem instances of ScotRail and Southern Railway, two major train operating companies in the UK, even in the most difficult real-world or artificial conditions (e.g. supposing a train can be served by any of 11 compatible types of self-powered unit), the standard QuickHull (Barber et al. in ACM Trans Math Softw 22:469–483, 1996) can easily compute the relevant convex hulls. For some even more difficult artificial instances that may fall outside the scope of rolling stock scheduling (e.g. a node in a graph can be covered by more than 11 kinds of compatible commodities), there is evidence showing that the “2-facet QuickHull” can be more advantageous over the standard QuickHull for our tested instances. When the number of commodity types is even higher (e.g. >19), or the number of points in a high dimensional space (e.g. 15 dimensions) is not small (e.g. >2000), the local convex hulls cannot be computed either by the standard or the 2-facet QuickHull methods within practical time.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiyuan Lin & Raymond S. K. Kwan, 2016. "Local convex hulls for a special class of integer multicommodity flow problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 881-919, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:64:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-016-9831-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-016-9831-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-016-9831-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-016-9831-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Bellmore & G. Bennington & S. Lubore, 1971. "A Multivehicle Tanker Scheduling Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 36-47, February.
    2. Koorush Ziarati & François Soumis & Jacques Desrosiers & Marius M. Solomon, 1999. "A Branch-First, Cut-Second Approach for Locomotive Assignment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(8), pages 1156-1168, August.
    3. Cordeau, Jean-François & Desaulniers, Guy & Lingaya, Norbert & Soumis, François & Desrosiers, Jacques, 2001. "Simultaneous locomotive and car assignment at VIA Rail Canada," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 767-787, September.
    4. Arianna Alfieri & Rutger Groot & Leo Kroon & Alexander Schrijver, 2006. "Efficient Circulation of Railway Rolling Stock," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 378-391, August.
    5. Rouillon, Stéphane & Desaulniers, Guy & Soumis, François, 2006. "An extended branch-and-bound method for locomotive assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 404-423, June.
    6. Lingaya, Norbert & Cordeau, Jean-Françcois & Desaulniers, Guy & Desrosiers, Jacques & Soumis, Françcois, 2002. "Operational car assignment at VIA Rail Canada," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 755-778, November.
    7. Jean-François Cordeau & François Soumis & Jacques Desrosiers, 2001. "Simultaneous Assignment of Locomotives and Cars to Passenger Trains," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 531-548, August.
    8. Fioole, Pieter-Jan & Kroon, Leo & Maroti, Gabor & Schrijver, Alexander, 2006. "A rolling stock circulation model for combining and splitting of passenger trains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1281-1297, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pan, Hanchuan & Liu, Zhigang & Yang, Lixing & Liang, Zhe & Wu, Qiang & Li, Sijie, 2021. "A column generation-based approach for integrated vehicle and crew scheduling on a single metro line with the fully automatic operation system by partial supervision," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Niu, Huimin & Zhou, Xuesong & Tian, Xiaopeng, 2018. "Coordinating assignment and routing decisions in transit vehicle schedules: A variable-splitting Lagrangian decomposition approach for solution symmetry breaking," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 70-101.
    3. Lin, Zhiyuan & Kwan, Raymond S.K., 2016. "A branch-and-price approach for solving the train unit scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 97-120.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Zhiyuan & Kwan, Raymond S.K., 2016. "A branch-and-price approach for solving the train unit scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 97-120.
    2. Haahr, J.T. & Wagenaar, J.C. & Veelenturf, L.P. & Kroon, L.G., 2015. "A Comparison of Two Exact Methods for Passenger Railway Rolling Stock (Re)Scheduling," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2015-007-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Lusby, Richard M. & Haahr, Jørgen Thorlund & Larsen, Jesper & Pisinger, David, 2017. "A Branch-and-Price algorithm for railway rolling stock rescheduling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 228-250.
    4. Gao, Yuan & Schmidt, Marie & Yang, Lixing & Gao, Ziyou, 2020. "A branch-and-price approach for trip sequence planning of high-speed train units," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Prashant Premkumar & P. N. Ram Kumar, 2019. "Literature Review of Locomotive Assignment Problem from Service Operations Perspective: The Case of Indian Railways," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 8(1), pages 74-86, January.
    6. Haahr, Jørgen T. & Wagenaar, Joris C. & Veelenturf, Lucas P. & Kroon, Leo G., 2016. "A comparison of two exact methods for passenger railway rolling stock (re)scheduling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 15-32.
    7. Canca, David & Barrena, Eva, 2018. "The integrated rolling stock circulation and depot location problem in railway rapid transit systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 115-138.
    8. Lin, Boliang & Zhao, Yinan, 2021. "Synchronized optimization of EMU train assignment and second-level preventive maintenance scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    9. Yu Zhou & Leishan Zhou & Yun Wang & Zhuo Yang & Jiawei Wu, 2017. "Application of Multiple-Population Genetic Algorithm in Optimizing the Train-Set Circulation Plan Problem," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-14, July.
    10. Prashant Premkumar & P. N. Ram Kumar, 2022. "Locomotive assignment problem: integrating the strategic, tactical and operational level aspects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 867-898, August.
    11. Rouillon, Stéphane & Desaulniers, Guy & Soumis, François, 2006. "An extended branch-and-bound method for locomotive assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 404-423, June.
    12. Dakic, Igor & Yang, Kaidi & Menendez, Monica & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2021. "On the design of an optimal flexible bus dispatching system with modular bus units: Using the three-dimensional macroscopic fundamental diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 38-59.
    13. Xueqiao Yu & Maoxiang Lang & Wenhui Zhang & Shiqi Li & Mingyue Zhang & Xiao Yu, 2019. "An Empirical Study on the Comprehensive Optimization Method of a Train Diagram of the China High Speed Railway Express," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, April.
    14. Zhong, Qingwei & Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper & Zhang, Yongxiang & Peng, Qiyuan, 2019. "Rolling stock scheduling with maintenance requirements at the Chinese High-Speed Railway," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 24-44.
    15. Frisch, Sarah & Hungerländer, Philipp & Jellen, Anna & Primas, Bernhard & Steininger, Sebastian & Weinberger, Dominic, 2021. "Solving a real-world Locomotive Scheduling Problem with Maintenance Constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 386-409.
    16. Nielsen, Lars Kjær & Kroon, Leo & Maróti, Gábor, 2012. "A rolling horizon approach for disruption management of railway rolling stock," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 496-509.
    17. Belgacem Bouzaiene-Ayari & Clark Cheng & Sourav Das & Ricardo Fiorillo & Warren B. Powell, 2016. "From Single Commodity to Multiattribute Models for Locomotive Optimization: A Comparison of Optimal Integer Programming and Approximate Dynamic Programming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 366-389, May.
    18. Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & De Almeida, David & Guyon, Olivier & Benhizia, Faten, 2015. "A Lagrangian heuristic framework for a real-life integrated planning problem of railway transportation resources," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 138-150.
    19. Wagenaar, J.C. & Kroon, L.G. & Schmidt, M.E., 2016. "Maintenance Appointments in Railway Rolling Stock Rescheduling," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2016-001-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. Joris C. Wagenaar & Leo G. Kroon & Marie Schmidt, 2017. "Maintenance Appointments in Railway Rolling Stock Rescheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1138-1160, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:64:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-016-9831-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.