IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v164y2021i1d10.1007_s10584-021-02999-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerabilities of irrigated and rainfed corn to climate change in a humid climate in the Lower Mississippi Delta

Author

Listed:
  • Saseendran S. Anapalli

    (USDA-ARS)

  • Srinivasa R. Pinnamaneni

    (USDA-ARS)

  • Daniel K. Fisher

    (USDA-ARS)

  • Krishna N. Reddy

    (USDA-ARS)

Abstract

The use of fossil fuels for energy needs increases atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations to levels that can significantly exacerbate the climate on earth. Assessing the vulnerability of regional crop production systems to such an altered climate in the future is essential for implementing appropriate adaptation and mitigation strategies for sustainable agriculture. We investigated the possible impacts of climate change (CC) projected by multiple global climate models (GCMs) on rainfed and irrigated corn (Zea mays L., a C4 plant) in the Lower Mississippi Delta region (LMD), USA. The CSM-CROPGRO-Maize v4.6 module in the RZWQM2 model (hereafter referred to as the “corn model”) was previously calibrated and validated for modeling corn at Stoneville, Mississippi, a representative location in the LMD was used. The CC scenarios considered in this study were ensembles of climate projections of multiple GCMs (97 ensemble members) that participated in the Climate Model Inter-comparison and Improvement Program 5. These CC scenarios were bias-corrected and spatially downscaled (BCSD) at the location for the years 2050 and 2080. Four representative GHG concentration pathways (RCP) 2.6, 4.5, 6.0, and 8.5 drove these CC scenarios. Under both irrigated and rainfed conditions, corn yield responses to enhanced CO2 were weak; thus, yield declined significantly in response to the enhanced air temperatures under all the RCP scenarios in both 2050 and 2080. The yield declines across RCPs ranged between 10 and 62% under irrigated conditions, and between 9 and 60% under rainfed conditions, mainly due to increased frequency of extreme temperatures and reduced crop durations. Water use efficiency declined between 22 and 150% under irrigated, and 8 and 54% under rainfed management. As an adaptation measure, planting corn up to 9 weeks earlier in the season, in general, failed to boost yields from increased crop duration and reduction in upper extreme air temperatures, as incidences of lower extreme temperatures also increased alarmingly. Development of cultivars that are more heat tolerant and produce higher yields under extreme temperatures would be required to combat corn yield decline in the region from climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Saseendran S. Anapalli & Srinivasa R. Pinnamaneni & Daniel K. Fisher & Krishna N. Reddy, 2021. "Vulnerabilities of irrigated and rainfed corn to climate change in a humid climate in the Lower Mississippi Delta," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:164:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10584-021-02999-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-021-02999-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-021-02999-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-021-02999-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, L. & Hoogenboom, G. & Ahuja, L.R. & Ascough II, J.C. & Saseendran, S.A., 2006. "Evaluation of the RZWQM-CERES-Maize hybrid model for maize production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 274-295, March.
    2. Witsanu Attavanich & Bruce McCarl, 2014. "How is CO 2 affecting yields and technological progress? A statistical analysis," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(4), pages 747-762, June.
    3. Saseendran, S.A. & Trout, T.J. & Ahuja, L.R. & Ma, L. & McMaster, G.S. & Nielsen, D.C. & Andales, A.A. & Chávez, J.L. & Ham, J., 2015. "Quantifying crop water stress factors from soil water measurements in a limited irrigation experiment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 191-205.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khorchani, M. & Awada, T. & Schmer, M. & Jin, V. & Birru, G. & Dangal, S.R.S. & Suyker, A. & Freidenreich, A., 2024. "Long-term croplands water productivity in response to management and climate in the Western US Corn Belt," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anapalli, Saseendran S. & Fisher, Daniel K. & Reddy, Krishna N. & Rajan, Nithya & Pinnamaneni, Srinivasa Rao, 2019. "Modeling evapotranspiration for irrigation water management in a humid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Chin‐Hsien Yu & Bruce A. McCarl & Jian‐Da Zhu, 2022. "Market response to typhoons: The role of information and expectations," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(2), pages 496-521, October.
    3. Jithitikulchai, Theepakorn, 2023. "The effect of climate change and agricultural diversification on the total value of agricultural output of farm households in Sub-Saharan Africa," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 18(2), October.
    4. Shahadha, Saadi Sattar & Wendroth, Ole & Zhu, Junfeng & Walton, Jason, 2019. "Can measured soil hydraulic properties simulate field water dynamics and crop production?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Christopher N. Boyer & Eunchun Park & Seong D. Yun, 2023. "Corn and soybean prevented planting acres response to weather," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 970-983, June.
    6. Cheng, Muxi & McCarl, Bruce A. & Fei, Chengcheng, 2022. "Impact of Climate Change on the U.S. Livestock Sector," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322255, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Thompson, Wyatt & Lu, Yaqiong & Gerlt, Scott & Yang, Xianyu & Campbell, J. Elliott & Kueppers, Lara M. & Snyder, Mark A., 2018. "Automatic Responses of Crop Stocks and Policies Buffer Climate Change Effects on Crop Markets and Price Volatility," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 98-105.
    8. Chen, Xiaoping & Qi, Zhiming & Gui, Dongwei & Gu, Zhe & Ma, Liwang & Zeng, Fanjiang & Li, Lanhai, 2019. "Simulating impacts of climate change on cotton yield and water requirement using RZWQM2," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 231-241.
    9. Saseendran, S.A. & Nielsen, D.C. & Ahuja, L.R. & Ma, L. & Lyon, D.J., 2013. "Simulated yield and profitability of five potential crops for intensifying the dryland wheat-fallow production system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 175-192.
    10. Allyson Williams & Neil White & Shahbaz Mushtaq & Geoff Cockfield & Brendan Power & Louis Kouadio, 2015. "Quantifying the response of cotton production in eastern Australia to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 183-196, March.
    11. Zhang, Hongliang & Mu, Jianhong E. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2018. "Adaptation to climate change via adjustment in land leasing: Evidence from dryland wheat farms in the U.S. Pacific Northwest," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 424-432.
    12. Anapalli, Saseendran S. & Ahuja, Lajpat R. & Gowda, Prasanna H. & Ma, Liwang & Marek, Gary & Evett, Steven R. & Howell, Terry A., 2016. "Simulation of crop evapotranspiration and crop coefficients with data in weighing lysimeters," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 274-283.
    13. Dokoohaki, Hamze & Gheysari, Mahdi & Mousavi, Sayed-Farhad & Zand-Parsa, Shahrokh & Miguez, Fernando E. & Archontoulis, Sotirios V. & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2016. "Coupling and testing a new soil water module in DSSAT CERES-Maize model for maize production under semi-arid condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 90-99.
    14. Ko, Jonghan & Piccinni, Giovanni & Steglich, Evelyn, 2009. "Using EPIC model to manage irrigated cotton and maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1323-1331, September.
    15. Kan, Iddo & Reznik, Ami & Kaminski, Jonathan & Kimhi, Ayal, 2023. "The impacts of climate change on cropland allocation, crop production, output prices and social welfare in Israel: A structural econometric framework," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Benjapon Prommawin & Nattanun Svavasu & Spol Tanpraphan & Voravee Saengavut & Theepakorn Jithitikulchai & Witsanu Attavanich & Bruce A. McCarl, 2024. "Impacts of climate change and agricultural diversification on agricultural production value of Thai farm households," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(7), pages 1-26, July.
    17. Zhang, Jing & Zhang, Huihui & Sima, Matthew W. & Trout, Thomas J. & Malone, Rob W. & Wang, Li, 2021. "Simulated deficit irrigation and climate change effects on sunflower production in Eastern Colorado with CSM-CROPGRO-Sunflower in RZWQM2," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    18. Attavanich, Witsanu, 2018. "How Is Climate Change Affecting Thailand’s Agriculture? A Literature Review with Policy Update," MPRA Paper 90255, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 12 Nov 2018.
    19. Anar, Mohammad J. & Lin, Zhulu & Hoogenboom, Gerrit & Shelia, Vakhtang & Batchelor, William D. & Teboh, Jasper M. & Ostlie, Michael & Schatz, Blaine G. & Khan, Mohamed, 2019. "Modeling growth, development and yield of Sugarbeet using DSSAT," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 58-70.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:164:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10584-021-02999-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.