IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/circec/v4y2024i4d10.1007_s43615-024-00373-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Pressure, Circular Economy Practices, and Sustainability Performance: The Moderating Effect of Ecological Innovation Capabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Vivian Osei

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
    GIMPA Business School
    University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

  • Disraeli Asante-Darko

    (GIMPA Business School
    Ashesi University)

  • Matthew Quayson

    (Ho Technical University)

Abstract

The literature linking circular economy (CE) and the triple bottom line (TBL) approach to sustainable development presents contradictory findings and lacks empirical support, other than implicit claims alluded to in current anecdotes, unsubstantiated with adequate scientific theories. Besides, whether adopting CE practices at the micro-level can support corporate sustainability remains unclear, owing to limitations in ecological innovation capabilities to support CE. Drawing on stakeholder theory and ecological modernization theory (EMT), we construct a theoretical framework that investigates whether stakeholder pressures for implementing CE practices can augment the TBL values of sustainability performance, moderated by firms’ ecological innovation capabilities for the CE paradigm. Using data from firms operating in Ghana’s mining industry, the conceptual model was evaluated using partial least square structural equation modeling. The results confirm the relevance of the pressures originating from organizational, market, and regulatory stakeholders to implement CE practices as a strong sustainability paradigm for enhancing the TBL dimensions. Also, companies that yield to stakeholder pressures to build innovative capabilities can effectively implement CE practices and improve their sustainability performance. Notably, high levels of ecological innovation capabilities complement CE practices to strengthen economic, social, and environmental sustainability. Subsequently, we supplement the growing theoretical discourse on CE’s contribution to sustainability with empirical information from the mining industry within an emerging country via the EMT and stakeholder theory to support CE advancement within firms’ operations and the broader sustainable development framework. Also, the critical implications for practice and policy are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivian Osei & Disraeli Asante-Darko & Matthew Quayson, 2024. "Stakeholder Pressure, Circular Economy Practices, and Sustainability Performance: The Moderating Effect of Ecological Innovation Capabilities," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 3139-3170, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:4:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-024-00373-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s43615-024-00373-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43615-024-00373-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43615-024-00373-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:4:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-024-00373-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.