IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v136y2020ics0305750x20302564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When means of implementation meet Ecological Modernization Theory: A critical frame for thinking about the Sustainable Development Goals initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Weber, Heloise
  • Weber, Martin

Abstract

The United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agenda has been hailed as the most comprehensive and integrated framework for addressing the twin challenges of global environmental change and global development. This all-encompassing framework has provided a unique intersection for inter- and trans-disciplinary critical research and scholarship aimed at interrogating and improving public policy. Nevertheless, there are crucial premises underpinning the agenda that have rarely been interrogated or subjected to explicit scrutiny. As a consequence, much of the analytical work focusing on the SDGs, their targets, indicators, and the interrelations between these, replicates these premises with problematic implications. We demonstrate that the approach manifested in the SDGs aligns strongly with Ecological Modernization Theory (EMT). It is on the basis of EMT that an integration of ‘environmental’ and ‘developmental’ objectives (goals) is proposed and advanced. We explicate this through a close analysis especially of the four explicitly environment-focussed goals (12, 13, 14, and 15), their “Means of Implementation”, and their overall integration with Goal 17. We apprehend the problems of EMT through this analysis. As we show, there are alternatives to the EMT approach to the environment-and-development constellation. Presenting it as inevitable, and accepting its premises thus turns out to be ultimately an ideological choice. Our analysis of the environment-and-development link under the SDGs makes such choices intelligible, and their implications clearer, irrespective of ideological preferences. Taking these critical insights into account more centrally is imperative for better understanding and responding to the evolving intersections between science, technology, ecology, and social, economic and political change.

Suggested Citation

  • Weber, Heloise & Weber, Martin, 2020. "When means of implementation meet Ecological Modernization Theory: A critical frame for thinking about the Sustainable Development Goals initiative," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:136:y:2020:i:c:s0305750x20302564
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X20302564
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beckerman, Wilfred, 1992. "Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? whose environment?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 481-496, April.
    2. Stern, David I., 2004. "The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1419-1439, August.
    3. Ann Florini & Markus Pauli, 2018. "Collaborative governance for the Sustainable Development Goals," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 583-598, September.
    4. Markus Krajewski, 2003. "Public Services and Trade Liberalization: Mapping the Legal Framework," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 341-367, June.
    5. Ann Florini and Markus Pauli, 2018. "Collaborative governance for the Sustainable Development Goals," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 201842, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    6. Lang, Andrew, 2013. "World Trade Law after Neoliberalism: Reimagining the Global Economic Order," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199674398.
    7. David Popp, 2011. "International Technology Transfer, Climate Change, and the Clean Development Mechanism," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 5(1), pages 131-152, Winter.
    8. Linda Kleemann & Awudu Abdulai, 2013. "The Impact Of Trade And Economic Growth On The Environment: Revisiting The Cross‐Country Evidence," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 180-205, March.
    9. Howse Robert, 2005. "WTO Governance and the Doha Round," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 5(4), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Joachim H. Spangenberg, 2017. "Hot Air or Comprehensive Progress? A Critical Assessment of the SDGs," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(4), pages 311-321, July.
    11. Margaret L. Satterthwaite & Sukti Dhital, 2019. "Measuring Access to Justice: Transformation and Technicality in SDG 16.3," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(S1), pages 96-109, January.
    12. Biggeri, Mario & Clark, David A. & Ferrannini, Andrea & Mauro, Vincenzo, 2019. "Tracking the SDGs in an ‘integrated’ manner: A proposal for a new index to capture synergies and trade-offs between and within goals," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 628-647.
    13. Martin Weber, 2001. "Competing Political Visions: WTO Governance and Green Politics," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 1(3), pages 92-113, August.
    14. Mehdi Nemati & Wuyang Hu & Michael Reed, 2019. "Are free trade agreements good for the environment? A panel data analysis," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 435-453, February.
    15. Andy Stirling, 2010. "Keep it complex," Nature, Nature, vol. 468(7327), pages 1029-1031, December.
    16. Ingrid Boas & Frank Biermann & Norichika Kanie, 2016. "Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 449-464, June.
    17. Charles Gore & Andrew Scott & Paula Lucci, 2015. "Universality and Ambition in the Post‐2015 Development Agenda: A Comparison of Global and National Targets," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(6), pages 752-775, August.
    18. Rai, Shirin M. & Brown, Benjamin D. & Ruwanpura, Kanchana N., 2019. "SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth – A gendered analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 368-380.
    19. Thomas Wanner, 2015. "The New 'Passive Revolution' of the Green Economy and Growth Discourse: Maintaining the 'Sustainable Development' of Neoliberal Capitalism," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 21-41, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nian Wang & Yingming Zhu, 2022. "The Integration of Traditional Transportation Infrastructure and Informatization Development: How Does It Affect Carbon Emissions?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Thor Olav Iversen, 2023. "Boundary experts: Science and politics in measuring the Sustainable Development Goals," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(4), pages 600-610, September.
    4. Vivian Osei & Disraeli Asante-Darko & Matthew Quayson, 2024. "Stakeholder Pressure, Circular Economy Practices, and Sustainability Performance: The Moderating Effect of Ecological Innovation Capabilities," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 3139-3170, December.
    5. Magdalena Rzemieniak & Monika Wawer, 2021. "Employer Branding in the Context of the Company’s Sustainable Development Strategy from the Perspective of Gender Diversity of Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Biqing Li & Qiuting Liu & Yuming Li & Shiyong Zheng, 2023. "Socioeconomic Productive Capacity and Renewable Energy Development: Empirical Insights from BRICS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Shahzad, Fakhar & Zaied, Younes Ben & Shahzad, Muhammad Asim & Mahmood, Faisal, 2024. "Insights into the performance of green supply chain in the Chinese semiconductor industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    8. Mazlina Manshor & Mohd Najib Saad, 2023. "Determinants of Sustainable Development among Malaysian Small and Medium Enterprises: A New Conceptual Framework," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(1), pages 94-105.
    9. Graham Long & Jecel Censoro & Katharina Rietig, 2023. "The sustainable development goals: governing by goals, targets and indicators," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 149-156, June.
    10. Naz, Farah & Tanveer, Arifa & Karim, Sitara & Dowling, Michael, 2024. "The decoupling dilemma: Examining economic growth and carbon emissions in emerging economic blocs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B. Venkatraja, 2021. "Does China exhibit any evidence of an Environmental Kuznets Curve? An ARDL bounds testing approach," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 88-110,111-.
    2. Tamazian, Artur & Bhaskara Rao, B., 2010. "Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 137-145, January.
    3. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Radtke, Jörg & Scherhaufer, Patrick, 2022. "A social science perspective on conflicts in the energy transition: An introduction to the special issue," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Longden, Thomas, 2014. "Going Forward by Looking Backwards on the Environmental Kuznets Curve: an Analysis of CFCs, CO2 and the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 183540, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    6. Valeria Costantini & Chiara Martini, 2010. "A Modified Environmental Kuznets Curve for sustainable development assessment using panel data," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1/2), pages 84-122.
    7. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2007:i:5:p:1-11 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Liu, Lee, 2012. "Environmental poverty, a decomposed environmental Kuznets curve, and alternatives: Sustainability lessons from China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 86-92.
    9. Cowan, Wendy N. & Chang, Tsangyao & Inglesi-Lotz, Roula & Gupta, Rangan, 2014. "The nexus of electricity consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 359-368.
    10. Stern, David I., 2014. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Primer," Working Papers 249424, Australian National University, Centre for Climate Economics & Policy.
    11. Rodríguez, Miguel & Pena-Boquete, Yolanda & Pardo-Fernández, Juan Carlos, 2016. "Revisiting Environmental Kuznets Curves through the energy price lens," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 32-41.
    12. Pascalau, Razvan & Qirjo, Dhimitri, 2017. "TTIP and the Environmental Kuznets Curve," MPRA Paper 80192, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Choumert, Johanna & Combes Motel, Pascale & Dakpo, Hervé K., 2013. "Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation a threatened theory? A meta-analysis of the literature," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 19-28.
    14. K. Herve DAKPO & Pascale COMBES MOTEL & Johanna CHOUMERT, 2012. "The environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a threatened theory? A meta-analysis," Working Papers 201216, CERDI.
    15. Azam, Muhammad & Khan, Abdul Qayyum, 2016. "Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A comparative empirical study for low, lower middle, upper middle and high income countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 556-567.
    16. Maria Stella Righettini, 2021. "Framing Sustainability. Evidence from Participatory Forums to Taylor the Regional 2030 Agenda to Local Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Bölük, Gülden & Mert, Mehmet, 2014. "Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of EU (European Union) countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 439-446.
    18. Tulin Dzhengiz, 2020. "A Literature Review of Inter-Organizational Sustainability Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-52, June.
    19. Moises Neil V Seriño, 2022. "Energy security through diversification of non-hydro renewable energy sources in developing countries," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(3), pages 546-561, May.
    20. Yashar Tarverdi, 2018. "Aspects of Governance and $$\hbox {CO}_2$$ CO 2 Emissions: A Non-linear Panel Data Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(1), pages 167-194, January.
    21. Yunus Zengin & Serkan Naktiyok & Erdoğan Kaygın & Onur Kavak & Ethem Topçuoğlu, 2021. "An Investigation upon Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 within the Context of Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:136:y:2020:i:c:s0305750x20302564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.