IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/chinre/v15y2022i5d10.1007_s12187-022-09942-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Client Agency in Child Protection Work in Estonia: Clients’ Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Tuuli-Brit Vaga

    (University of Tartu)

  • Dagmar Kutsar

    (University of Tartu)

Abstract

This article explores how child protection clients perceive their opportunities to exercise agency in their encounters with child protection services. Child clients include respondents who were children at the time of responding or had previous contact with child protection services, i.e. those under the age of 18 (n = 217); adult clients include parents, guardians, and relatives (collectively referred to as “family members”) who had personal experience with child protection workers (n = 505). The analysis applies a three dimensionional framework of understanding agency (autonomy, construction and action) inspired by Kuczynski and colleagues. The analysis showed that child protection clients, i.e. both children and adults, have insufficient opportunities to exercise their agency in their interactions with child protection services. One of the factors hindering the exercise of agency is the power imbalance perceived by clients due to the lack of transparency in child protection work and the imposition of their own opinions by child protection practitioners. On the other hand, agency is enhanced if the client feels that they are an equal partner in their interactions with the child protection worker. It was also found that an opportunity to exercise agency made children and their family members feel that child protection work had been effective: a large proportion of both children and adults who had been able to exercise agency reported that their situation improved as a result of child protection work. The article concludes with recommendations for enhancing child protection clients’ agency in their interactions with child protection practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuuli-Brit Vaga & Dagmar Kutsar, 2022. "Client Agency in Child Protection Work in Estonia: Clients’ Perspectives," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(5), pages 1793-1820, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:15:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s12187-022-09942-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12187-022-09942-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-022-09942-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12187-022-09942-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tilbury, Clare & Ramsay, Sylvia, 2018. "A systematic scoping review of parental satisfaction with child protection services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 141-146.
    2. Baker, Amy J.L., 2007. "Client feedback in child welfare programs: Current trends and future directions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1189-1200, September.
    3. Mundy, Crystal L. & Neufeld, Amanda N. & Wells, Susan J., 2016. "A culturally relevant measure of client satisfaction in child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 177-189.
    4. Ayala-Nunes, Lara & Jiménez, Lucía & Hidalgo, Victoria & Jesus, Saul, 2014. "Family feedback in Child Welfare Services: A systematic review of measures," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 299-306.
    5. Solava Ibrahim, 2017. "How to Build Collective Capabilities: The 3C-Model for Grassroots-Led Development," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 197-222, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tilbury, Clare & Ramsay, Sylvia, 2018. "A systematic scoping review of parental satisfaction with child protection services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 141-146.
    2. Bjørknes, Ragnhild & Ortiz-Barreda, Gaby, 2021. "Are the voices of parents heard? A scoping review of satisfaction in parenting programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Mundy, Crystal L. & Neufeld, Amanda N. & Wells, Susan J., 2016. "A culturally relevant measure of client satisfaction in child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 177-189.
    4. Saar-Heiman, Yuval, 2023. "Power with and power over: Social workers’ reflections on their use of power when talking with parents about child welfare concerns," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Balsells, Maria Àngels & Pastor, Crescencia & Mateos, Ainoa & Vaquero, Eduard & Urrea, Aida, 2015. "Exploring the needs of parents for achieving reunification: The views of foster children, birth family and social workers in Spain," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 159-166.
    6. Schneiderman, Janet U. & Smith, Caitlin & Palinkas, Lawrence A., 2012. "The caregiver as gatekeeper for accessing health care for children in foster care: A qualitative study of kinship and unrelated caregivers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2123-2130.
    7. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    8. Stepleton, Kate & Bosk, Emily Adlin & Duron, Jacquelynn F. & Greenfield, Brett & Ocasio, Kerrie & MacKenzie, Michael J., 2018. "Exploring associations between maternal adverse childhood experiences and child behavior," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 80-87.
    9. Tatiana Casado & Joan Albert Riera & Josefa Cardona, 2020. "Social Work with Families in Special Distress: Collaborative Practices," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Estefan, Lianne Fuino & Coulter, Martha L. & VandeWeerd, Carla L. & Armstrong, Mary & Gorski, Peter, 2012. "Receiving mandated therapeutic services: Experiences of parents involved in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2353-2360.
    11. Jacob Clark & Euan MacLennan, 2023. "Measuring Experience of Inpatient Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-10, May.
    12. Jiménez, Lucía & Canavan, John & Baena, Sofía & Herrera, David & Lloyd, Andy & Schima, Johanna & Jean Grasmeijer, Anna, 2024. "Mapping key actors in family support. A European perspective," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Sarah Baird & Laura Camfield & Anita Ghimire & Bassam Abu Hamad & Nicola Jones & Kate Pincock & Tassew Woldehanna, 2021. "Intersectionality as a Framework for Understanding Adolescent Vulnerabilities in Low and Middle Income Countries: Expanding Our Commitment to Leave No One Behind," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(5), pages 1143-1162, October.
    14. Shankaran Nambiar, 2021. "Capabilities and Communities: A Perspective from Institutional Economics," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(6), pages 1973-1996, December.
    15. Enrica Chiappero-Martinetti & Christopher Houghton Budd & Rafael Ziegler, 2017. "Social Innovation and the Capability Approach—Introduction to the Special Issue," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 141-147, April.
    16. Ayala-Nunes, Lara & Jiménez, Lucía & Hidalgo, Victoria & Jesus, Saul, 2014. "Family feedback in Child Welfare Services: A systematic review of measures," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 299-306.
    17. Cudjoe, Ebenezer & Uggerhøj, Lars & Abdullah, Alhassan, 2020. "“We are consultants, not collaborators”: Young people’s experiences with child protection meetings in Ghana," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Ahn, Haksoon & Keyser, Daniel & Hayward-Everson, R. Anna, 2016. "A multi-level analysis of individual and agency effects on implementation of family-centered practice in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 11-18.
    19. Migheli, Matteo & D’ambrosio, Anna, 2022. "Regional Resilience through the Lenses of the Capability Approach," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 202209, University of Turin.
    20. Hall, Christopher & Slembrouck, Stef, 2011. "Interviewing parents of children in care: Perspectives, discourses and accountability," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 457-465, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:15:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s12187-022-09942-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.