IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i7p121-d383419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Work with Families in Special Distress: Collaborative Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Casado

    (Department of Philosophy and Social Work, Faculty of Philosophy and Literature, University of Illes Balears, 07015 Palma, Illes Balears, Spain)

  • Joan Albert Riera

    (Department of Philosophy and Social Work, Faculty of Philosophy and Literature, University of Illes Balears, 07015 Palma, Illes Balears, Spain)

  • Josefa Cardona

    (Department of Philosophy and Social Work, Faculty of Philosophy and Literature, University of Illes Balears, 07015 Palma, Illes Balears, Spain)

Abstract

Collaborative practices have emerged as an effective approach for conducting social work interventions with families in special distress. This study aimed to ascertain the perspective of the social workers located in basic community social services, in relation to the development of a collaborative approach with families in special distress. The main objective was to find out the level of importance and the level of implementation that participants (N = 121) gave to the different intervention criteria included in an Inventory of Collaborative Practices. The results indicate that criteria related to basic issues in social case work (active listening, respect, and empathy) as well as the management and bureaucracy of the specific case are the most valued and performed by social workers. The least valued and performed criteria have to do with issues that involve reflective processes in the helping relationship, both with the family and with the rest of the professionals. Implications for practice and quality enhancement are discussed, as they are key aspects in the development of collaborative interventions in social work.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Casado & Joan Albert Riera & Josefa Cardona, 2020. "Social Work with Families in Special Distress: Collaborative Practices," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:7:p:121-:d:383419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/7/121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/7/121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Visscher, L. & Evenboer, K.E. & Jansen, D.E.M.C. & Scholte, R.H.J. & Knot-Dickscheit, J. & Veerman, J.W. & Reijneveld, S.A. & van Yperen, T.A., 2018. "Identifying practice and program elements of interventions for families with multiple problems: The development of a taxonomy," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 64-70.
    2. Edgar Marthinsen & Graham Clifford & Halvor Fauske & Willy Lichtwarck, 2020. "Professional Values Challenged by Case Management—Theorizing Practice in Child Protection with Reflexive Practitioners," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Pannebakker, Noortje M. & Kocken, Paul L. & Theunissen, Meinou H.C. & van Mourik, Krista & Crone, Matty R. & Numans, Mattijs E. & Reijneveld, Sijmen A., 2018. "Services use by children and parents in multiproblem families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 222-228.
    4. Evenboer, K.E. & Reijneveld, S.A. & Jansen, D.E.M.C., 2018. "Improving care for multiproblem families: Context-specific effectiveness of interventions?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 274-285.
    5. Ayala-Nunes, Lara & Jiménez, Lucía & Hidalgo, Victoria & Jesus, Saul, 2014. "Family feedback in Child Welfare Services: A systematic review of measures," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 299-306.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergio Ochoa Jiménez & Alma Rocío García García & Beatriz Alicia Leyva Osuna & Sacnicté Valdez del Río, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Behavior of SMEs and Characteristics of the Managers of Northwest Mexico," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Visscher, L. & Jansen, D.E.M.C. & Scholte, R.H.J. & van Yperen, T.A. & Evenboer, K.E. & Reijneveld, S.A., 2022. "Elements of care that matter: Perspectives of families with multiple problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Visscher, L. & Evenboer, K.E. & Scholte, R.H.J. & van Yperen, T.A. & Knot-Dickscheit, J. & Jansen, D.E.M.C. & Reijneveld, S.A., 2020. "Elucidating care for families with multiple problems in routine practice: Self-registered practice and program elements of practitioners," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Hornyák, F. & Visscher, L. & Delsing, M.J.M.H. & Evenboer, K.E. & Scholte, R.H.J. & Reijneveld, S.A. & Jansen, D.E.M.C., 2023. "Improving interventions for families with multiple problems: Identifying elements that predict improvement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Tuuli-Brit Vaga & Dagmar Kutsar, 2022. "Client Agency in Child Protection Work in Estonia: Clients’ Perspectives," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(5), pages 1793-1820, October.
    5. Balsells, Maria Àngels & Pastor, Crescencia & Mateos, Ainoa & Vaquero, Eduard & Urrea, Aida, 2015. "Exploring the needs of parents for achieving reunification: The views of foster children, birth family and social workers in Spain," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 159-166.
    6. Noortje M Pannebakker & Paul L Kocken & Paula van Dommelen & Krista van Mourik & Ria Reis & Sijmen A Reijneveld & Mattijs E Numans, 2020. "Care use and its intensity in children with complex problems are related to varying child and family factors: A follow-up study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Tilbury, Clare & Ramsay, Sylvia, 2018. "A systematic scoping review of parental satisfaction with child protection services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 141-146.
    8. Bjørknes, Ragnhild & Ortiz-Barreda, Gaby, 2021. "Are the voices of parents heard? A scoping review of satisfaction in parenting programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. van Assen, Arjen & Knot-Dickscheit, Jana & Grietens, Hans & Post, Wendy, 2021. "Fidelity and flexibility of care activities in child-centered youth care for children growing up in families experiencing complex and multiple problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    10. Visscher, L. & Evenboer, K.E. & Jansen, D.E.M.C. & Scholte, R.H.J. & Knot-Dickscheit, J. & Veerman, J.W. & Reijneveld, S.A. & van Yperen, T.A., 2018. "Identifying practice and program elements of interventions for families with multiple problems: The development of a taxonomy," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 64-70.
    11. Ahn, Haksoon & Keyser, Daniel & Hayward-Everson, R. Anna, 2016. "A multi-level analysis of individual and agency effects on implementation of family-centered practice in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 11-18.
    12. Desautels, Julien & Touchette, Luc & Pauzé, Robert, 2020. "Intensive family intervention programs: Tailoring interventions to family clinical profiles," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    13. Mundy, Crystal L. & Neufeld, Amanda N. & Wells, Susan J., 2016. "A culturally relevant measure of client satisfaction in child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 177-189.
    14. Leonieke Boendermaker & Erwin Landman, 2022. "Video Feedback to Enhance Fidelity in Practice-Based Interventions for Young People, a Small-n Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:7:p:121-:d:383419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.