IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/astaws/v14y2020i3d10.1007_s11943-020-00278-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Prognose von Studienerfolg und Studienabbruch auf Basis von Umfrage- und administrativen Prüfungsdaten

Author

Listed:
  • Sören Pannier

    (Freie Universität Berlin)

  • Ulrich Rendtel

    (Freie Universität Berlin)

  • Hartmut Gerks

    (Humboldt Universität zu Berlin)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Die Messung von Studienerfolg bzw. Studienabbruch erfolgt häufig retrospektiv anhand von Exmatrikulierten-Befragungen. Diese Erhebungen sind jedoch mit hohen Nonresponse-Raten verknüpft. Auch die retrospektive Selbsteinschätzung unterliegt Erinnerungsfehlern. Alternativ findet man auch prospektive Ansätze im Rahmen von Panelerhebungen, die jedoch von Stichprobenausfällen zwischen den Befragungswellen betroffen sind. Dieser Artikel präsentiert einen neuen prospektiven Ansatz auf Basis von administrativen Prüfungsdaten und Umfragedaten. Hintergrundinformationen über die Studierenden werden zu Beginn des zweiten Fachsemesters im Rahmen einer Hörsaalbefragung erhoben. Die notwendige Einwilligung der Studierenden zur Verknüpfung mit den Prüfungsdaten wird fast immer erreicht, so dass der Einfluss von Hintergrundmerkmalen, Nebentätigkeit während des Studiums sowie der Studienmotivation auf den Studienabschluss ohne Stichprobenausfälle analysiert werden kann. Dieser Ansatz wurde erstmalig am Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaft der FU Berlin realisiert. Der Aufsatz beschreibt die Durchführung dieses Konzepts sowie Analyseergebnisse für den Studienverlauf und Studienabbrüche. Im Ergebnis erhalten wir, dass sich ein Studienabbruch schon in der Studieneingangsphase anhand der erworbenen Leistungspunkte und der Selbsteinschätzung der Studierenden sehr genau vorhersagen lässt. Hingegen liefern die Schulnote und die sozialen Hintergrundmerkmale keine zusätzliche Information für einen Studienabbruch.

Suggested Citation

  • Sören Pannier & Ulrich Rendtel & Hartmut Gerks, 2020. "Die Prognose von Studienerfolg und Studienabbruch auf Basis von Umfrage- und administrativen Prüfungsdaten," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 14(3), pages 225-266, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:astaws:v:14:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11943-020-00278-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11943-020-00278-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11943-020-00278-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11943-020-00278-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver Himmler & Robert Jäckle & Philipp Weinschenk, 2019. "Soft Commitments, Reminders, and Academic Performance," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 114-142, April.
    2. Rendtel, Ulrich & Basic, Edin, 2007. "Assessing the bias due to non-coverage of residential movers in the German microcensus panel: an evaluation using data from the socio-economic panel," Discussion Papers 2007/6, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    3. Edin Basic & Ulrich Rendtel, 2007. "Assessing the bias due to non-coverage of residential movers in the German Microcensus Panel: an evaluation using data from the Socio-Economic Panel," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 91(3), pages 311-334, October.
    4. Kamila Danilowicz-Gösele & Katharina Lerche & Johannes Meya & Robert Schwager, 2017. "Determinants of students' success at university," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 513-532, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walter Krämer, 2019. "Interview mit Ulrich Rendtel," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 13(2), pages 179-187, September.
    2. Rendtel, Ulrich & Alho, Juha M., 2022. "On the fade-away of an initial bias in longitudinal surveys," Discussion Papers 2022/4, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    3. Nicholas A. Wright & Puneet Arora & Jesse Wright, 2024. "I Promise to Work Hard: The Impact of a Non-Binding Commitment Pledge on Academic Performance," Working Papers 2411, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
    4. Aina, Carmen & Baici, Eliana & Casalone, Giorgia & Pastore, Francesco, 2018. "The Economics of University Dropouts and Delayed Graduation: A Survey," IZA Discussion Papers 11421, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Lars Behlen & Oliver Himmler & Robert Jäckle, 2023. "Defaults and effortful tasks," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(5), pages 1022-1059, November.
    6. Koch, Alexander K. & Nafziger, Julia, 2020. "Motivational goal bracketing: An experiment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Nafziger, Julia & Kaiser, Jonas P. & Koch, Alexander K, 2021. "Self-Set Goals Are Effective Self-Regulation Tools -- Despite Goal Revision," CEPR Discussion Papers 15716, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Isphording, Ingo E. & Raabe, Tobias, 2019. "Early Identification of College Dropouts Using Machine-Learning: Conceptual Considerations and an Empirical Example," IZA Research Reports 89, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Shoji, Masahiro & Cato, Susumu & Ito, Asei & Iida, Takashi & Ishida, Kenji & Katsumata, Hiroto & McElwain, Kenneth Mori, 2022. "Mobile health technology as a solution to self-control problems: The behavioral impact of COVID-19 contact tracing apps in Japan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    10. Hardt, David & Nagler, Markus & Rincke, Johannes, 2022. "Can peer mentoring improve online teaching effectiveness? An RCT during the COVID-19 pandemic," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    11. Aina, Carmen & Baici, Eliana & Casalone, Giorgia & Pastore, Francesco, 2022. "The determinants of university dropout: A review of the socio-economic literature," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Brade, Raphael & Himmler, Oliver & Jäckle, Robert, 2018. "Normatively Framed Relative Performance Feedback – Field Experiment and Replication," MPRA Paper 88830, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Wolter, Stefan C. & Zumbühl, Maria, 2017. "The Native-Migrant Gap in the Progression into and through Upper-Secondary Education," IZA Discussion Papers 11217, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Raphael Brade & Oliver Himmler & Robert Jaeckle & Philipp Weinschenk, 2024. "Helping Students to Succeed – The Long-Term Effects of Soft Commitments and Reminders," CESifo Working Paper Series 11001, CESifo.
    15. Berlingieri, Francesco & Diegmann, André & Sprietsma, Maresa, 2023. "Preferred field of study and academic performance," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Gershoni, Naomi & Stryjan, Miri, 2023. "Do Deadlines Affect Project Completion? Experimental Evidence from Israeli Vocational Colleges," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 359-375.
    17. Pettersson, Nicklas & Karlsson, Niklas & Andrén, Daniela, 2023. "Does eligibility requirements matter for academic achievements? A quasi-experimental retrospective study of students studying intermediate statistics," Working Papers 2023:1, Örebro University, School of Business.
    18. Katare, Bhagyashree, 2021. "Do low-cost economic incentives motivate healthy behavior?," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    19. Biscaia, Ricardo & Sá, Carla & Teixeira, Pedro N., 2021. "The (In)effectiveness of regulatory policies in higher education—The case of access policy in Portugal," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 176-185.
    20. Amanda J. Felkey & Eva Dziadula & Eric P. Chiang, 2023. "Does Social Accountability Motivate Commitment Behavior Among College Students?," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 29(4), pages 293-301, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:astaws:v:14:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11943-020-00278-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.