IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v342y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-024-05827-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A collaborative decision support framework for sustainable cargo composition in container shipping services

Author

Listed:
  • Mevlut Savas Bilican

    (National Defence University)

  • Çağatay Iris

    (University of Liverpool Management School)

  • Mumtaz Karatas

    (Wright State University)

Abstract

This paper proposes a decision support system (DSS) for optimizing cargo composition, and resulting stowage plan, in a containership of a shipping company in collaboration with en-route ports in the service. Due to considerable growth in transportation over years, an increasing number of containers are being handled by containerships, and ports consequently. Trade imbalances between regions and recent disruptions, such as LA/LB/Shanghai port congestion, blocking of Suez canal, drought in Panama canal, typhoons at ports, COVID-19 restrictions and the lack- and then over-supply of empty containers, have resulted in an accumulation of containers in exporting ports around the world. These factors have underscored the urgency of sustainability and circular economy within the shipping industry. The demand for container transportation is higher than the ship capacities in the recent times. In this regard, it is essential for shipping companies to generate a cargo composition plan for each service by selecting and transporting containers with relatively high financial returns, while offering a realistic stowage plan considering ship stability, capacity limitations and port operations. Ultimately, the selected containers should enable a ship stowage plan which keeps the ship seaworthy obeying complex stability considerations and minimizes the vessel stay at the ports, and port carbon emissions consequently, through efficient collaboration with en-route ports. This study provides a bi-level programming based DSS that selects the set of containers to be loaded at each port of service and generates a detailed stowage plan considering revenue, stowage efficiency and quay crane operational considerations. Numerical experiments indicate that the proposed DSS is capable of returning high-quality solutions within reasonable solution times for all ship sizes, cargo contents and shipping routes, supporting the principles of the circular economy in the maritime domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Mevlut Savas Bilican & Çağatay Iris & Mumtaz Karatas, 2024. "A collaborative decision support framework for sustainable cargo composition in container shipping services," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 79-111, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:342:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-05827-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-05827-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-05827-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-024-05827-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Defeng & Tang, Lixin & Baldacci, Roberto & Lim, Andrew, 2021. "An exact algorithm for the unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with vessel stability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 271-283.
    2. Moussawi-Haidar, Lama, 2014. "Optimal solution for a cargo revenue management problem with allotment and spot arrivals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 173-191.
    3. Chen, Rongying & Dong, Jing-Xin & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2016. "Pricing and competition in a shipping market with waste shipments and empty container repositioning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 32-55.
    4. Weihua Liu & Yanjie Liang & Xinran Shen, 2023. "Decentralised or collaborative? Cooperation strategy choice of the supply chain under logistics service integrator empowerment and market size fluctuation," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 343-378.
    5. Christensen, Jonas & Pacino, Dario, 2017. "A matheuristic for the Cargo Mix Problem with Block Stowage," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 151-171.
    6. Iris, Çağatay & Christensen, Jonas & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan, 2018. "Flexible ship loading problem with transfer vehicle assignment and scheduling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 113-134.
    7. Wang, Yadong & Meng, Qiang, 2021. "Optimizing freight rate of spot market containers with uncertainties in shipping demand and available ship capacity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 314-332.
    8. Kjetil Fagerholt & Lars Hvattum & Trond Johnsen & Jarl Korsvik, 2013. "Routing and scheduling in project shipping," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 207(1), pages 67-81, August.
    9. Parreño, Francisco & Pacino, Dario & Alvarez-Valdes, Ramon, 2016. "A GRASP algorithm for the container stowage slot planning problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 141-157.
    10. Ang, James S.K. & Cao, Chengxuan & Ye, Heng-Qing, 2007. "Model and algorithms for multi-period sea cargo mix problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 1381-1393, August.
    11. Lee, Chung-Yee & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 442-474.
    12. Wang, Yadong & Meng, Qiang & Du, Yuquan, 2015. "Liner container seasonal shipping revenue management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 141-161.
    13. Byung Kwon Lee & Joyce M. W. Low, 2022. "A constraint programming approach to capacity planning in container vessels," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 415-438, June.
    14. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan & Larsen, Allan, 2015. "Integrated Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Assignment Problem: Set partitioning models and computational results," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 75-97.
    15. Berit Dangaard Brouer & Christian Vad Karsten & David Pisinger, 2018. "Optimization in liner shipping," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(1), pages 205-236, December.
    16. Hui Zhao & Qiang Meng & Yadong Wang, 2022. "Robust container slot allocation with uncertain demand for liner shipping services," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 551-579, September.
    17. Sebastian Zurheide & Kathrin Fischer, 2012. "A revenue management slot allocation model for liner shipping networks," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 14(3), pages 334-361, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhijuan Kang & Ming Gao & Wei Dang & Jiajie Wang, 2024. "Optimization Model and Solution Algorithm for Space Station Cargo Supply Planning under Complex Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Qinghe & Li, Wei & Meng, Qiang, 2024. "Single-leg shipping revenue management for expedited services with ambiguous elasticity in transit-time-sensitive demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Meng, Qiang & Zhao, Hui & Wang, Yadong, 2019. "Revenue management for container liner shipping services: Critical review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 280-292.
    3. Liang, Jinpeng & Li, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Tan, Zhijia, 2023. "Service-oriented container slot allocation policy under stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Liang, Jinpeng & Ma, Zhongyuan & Wang, Shuang & Liu, Haitao & Tan, Zhijia, 2024. "Dynamic container slot allocation with empty container repositioning under stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Moussawi-Haidar, Lama & Nasr, Walid & Jalloul, Maya, 2021. "Standardized cargo network revenue management with dual channels under stochastic and time-dependent demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 275-291.
    6. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho & Zhuo, Xiaopo, 2020. "Pricing with risk sensitive competing container shipping lines: Will risk seeking do more good than harm?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 210-229.
    7. Wang, Yadong & Wang, Shuaian, 2021. "Deploying, scheduling, and sequencing heterogeneous vessels in a liner container shipping route," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Byung Kwon Lee & Joyce M. W. Low, 2022. "A constraint programming approach to capacity planning in container vessels," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 415-438, June.
    9. Najafi, Mehdi & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2021. "Pricing and quality setting strategy in maritime transportation: Considering empty repositioning and demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    10. Hui Zhao & Qiang Meng & Yadong Wang, 2022. "Robust container slot allocation with uncertain demand for liner shipping services," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 551-579, September.
    11. Iris, Çağatay & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "Recoverable robustness in weekly berth and quay crane planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 365-389.
    12. Zhong, Huiling & Zhang, Fa & Gu, Yimiao, 2021. "A Stackelberg game based two-stage framework to make decisions of freight rate for container shipping lines in the emerging blockchain-based market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Yang, Ruina & Yu, Mingzhu & Lee, Chung-Yee & Du, Yuquan, 2021. "Contracting in ocean transportation with empty container repositioning under asymmetric information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    14. Turkay Yildiz, 2019. "Design and Analysis of a Lightweight Composite Shipping Container Made of Carbon Fiber Laminates," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, July.
    15. van Twiller, Jaike & Sivertsen, Agnieszka & Pacino, Dario & Jensen, Rune Møller, 2024. "Literature survey on the container stowage planning problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(3), pages 841-857.
    16. Wang, Tingsong & Meng, Qiang & Wang, Shuaian & Qu, Xiaobo, 2021. "A two-stage stochastic nonlinear integer-programming model for slot allocation of a liner container shipping service," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 143-160.
    17. Zhen, Lu & Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Kai, 2022. "Integrated berth and yard space allocation under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-27.
    18. Gao, Yinping & Zhen, Lu, 2024. "A decision framework for decomposed stowage planning for containers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Jeong, Yoonjea & Kim, Gwang, 2023. "Reliable design of container shipping network with foldable container facility disruption," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    20. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:342:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-05827-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.