IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v133y2020icp210-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing with risk sensitive competing container shipping lines: Will risk seeking do more good than harm?

Author

Listed:
  • Choi, Tsan-Ming
  • Chung, Sai-Ho
  • Zhuo, Xiaopo

Abstract

Container-shipping-lines (CSLs) operate in a highly competitive market with high demand volatility. Unlike many other industries in which risk-averse attitude is dominating, it is well known that many CSLs exhibit risk-seeking behaviors. In this paper, by using the mean-risk formulation, we analytically study the effects of risk attitude and demand volatility on the service pricing game between two CSLs. We find that the equilibrium prices increase when CSLs can accept more risk, and being slightly risk-seeking can help maximize the expected profits of both CSLs. We discover the risk-attitude convergence effect, which theoretically reveals that the “optimal risk attitudes” for the CSLs move in the same direction. Therefore, our research suggests that both CSLs should hire slightly risk-seeking managers in a competitive shipping market. In addition, we explore the impacts brought by demand volatility and find that the equilibrium prices increase (decrease) in the demand volatility when CSLs are risk-seeking (risk-averse). We uncover that when an individual CSL's risk sensitivity level is small and its rival is risk-seeking, its own expected profit under the decentralized case could be larger than that in centralized case. Finally, for robustness checking of our research findings, we investigate the scenarios with multiplicative randomness of demand, asymmetric information on risk attitude and multiple (more than two) competing CSLs, and find that our main findings still hold. Counterintuitively, in the case with multiplicatively random demand, we analytically find that CSLs may not prefer a large market potential when they are risk-averse.

Suggested Citation

  • Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho & Zhuo, Xiaopo, 2020. "Pricing with risk sensitive competing container shipping lines: Will risk seeking do more good than harm?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 210-229.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:133:y:2020:i:c:p:210-229
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2020.01.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019126151930308X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2020.01.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luciano, Elisa & Peccati, Lorenzo & Cifarelli, Donato M., 2003. "VaR as a risk measure for multiperiod static inventory models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 375-384, January.
    2. Wang, Fan & Zhuo, Xiaopo & Niu, Baozhuang & He, Jiayi, 2017. "Who canvasses for cargos? Incentive analysis and channel structure in a shipping supply chain," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 78-101.
    3. Xiaowen Fu & Anming Zhang, 2010. "Effects of Airport Concession Revenue Sharing on Airline Competition and Social Welfare," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 44(2), pages 119-138, May.
    4. Chen, Gang & Rytter, Niels G.M. & Jiang, Liping & Nielsen, Peter & Jensen, Lars, 2017. "Pre-announcements of price increase intentions in liner shipping spot markets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 109-125.
    5. Chen, Rongying & Dong, Jing-Xin & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2016. "Pricing and competition in a shipping market with waste shipments and empty container repositioning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 32-55.
    6. Peng, Zixuan & Shan, Wenxuan & Guan, Feng & Yu, Bin, 2016. "Stable vessel-cargo matching in dry bulk shipping market with price game mechanism," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 76-94.
    7. Li, Bo & Hou, Peng-Wen & Chen, Ping & Li, Qing-Hua, 2016. "Pricing strategy and coordination in a dual channel supply chain with a risk-averse retailer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 154-168.
    8. Hangjun Yang & Anming Zhang & Xiaowen Fu, 2015. "Determinants of Airport-Airline Vertical Arrangements: Analytical Results and Empirical Evidence," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 49(3), pages 438-453, July.
    9. Bradley Guthrie & Pratik J. Parikh & Nan Kong, 2017. "Evaluating warehouse strategies for two-product class distribution planning," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(21), pages 6470-6484, November.
    10. Zhou, Wei-Hua & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2009. "Pricing and competition in a transportation market with empty equipment repositioning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 677-691, July.
    11. Timothy W. McGuire & Richard Staelin, 1983. "An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical Integration," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 161-191.
    12. Lee, Chung-Yee & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 442-474.
    13. Wang, Yadong & Meng, Qiang & Du, Yuquan, 2015. "Liner container seasonal shipping revenue management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 141-161.
    14. Liu, Weihua & Wang, Yijia, 2015. "Quality control game model in logistics service supply chain based on different combinations of risk attitude," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 181-191.
    15. Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Hua & Meng, Qiang, 2015. "Itinerary provision and pricing in container liner shipping revenue management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 135-146.
    16. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Li, Duan & Yan, Houmin & Chiu, Chun-Hung, 2008. "Channel coordination in supply chains with agents having mean-variance objectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 565-576, August.
    17. Goh, Shao Hung & Chan, Yuxian, 2016. "Operational shadow pricing in back haul container shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 3-15.
    18. Tianhu Deng & Ying‐Ju Chen & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2015. "Optimal pricing and scheduling control of product shipping," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(3), pages 215-227, April.
    19. Gangshu (George) Cai & Yue Dai & Sean X. Zhou, 2012. "Exclusive Channels and Revenue Sharing in a Complementary Goods Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 172-187, January.
    20. Tapiero, Charles S., 2005. "Value at risk and inventory control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(3), pages 769-775, June.
    21. H. Leibenstein, 1950. "Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 64(2), pages 183-207.
    22. Chun-Hung Chiu & Tsan-Ming Choi, 2016. "Supply chain risk analysis with mean-variance models: a technical review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(2), pages 489-507, May.
    23. Wang, Hua & Meng, Qiang & Zhang, Xiaoning, 2014. "Game-theoretical models for competition analysis in a new emerging liner container shipping market," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 201-227.
    24. Liming Liu & Mahmut Parlar & Stuart X. Zhu, 2007. "Pricing and Lead Time Decisions in Decentralized Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 713-725, May.
    25. Liu, Mengqi & Cao, Erbao & Salifou, Coulibaly Kigbajah, 2016. "Pricing strategies of a dual-channel supply chain with risk aversion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 108-120.
    26. Tsan-Ming Choi & Chun-Hung Chiu, 2012. "Risk Analysis in Stochastic Supply Chains," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-3869-4, April.
    27. Wang, Fan & Yang, Xiao & Zhuo, Xiaopo & Xiong, Minghua, 2019. "Joint logistics and financial services by a 3PL firm: Effects of risk preference and demand volatility," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 312-328.
    28. Zhang, Anming & Fu, Xiaowen & Yang, Hangjun (Gavin), 2010. "Revenue sharing with multiple airlines and airports," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 944-959, September.
    29. Vipul Agrawal & Sridhar Seshadri, 2000. "Impact of Uncertainty and Risk Aversion on Price and Order Quantity in the Newsvendor Problem," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 410-423, July.
    30. Cui, Qinquan & Chiu, Chun-Hung & Dai, Xin & Li, Zhongfei, 2016. "Store brand introduction in a two-echelon logistics system with a risk-averse retailer," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 69-89.
    31. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Wen, Xin & Sun, Xuting & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2019. "The mean-variance approach for global supply chain risk analysis with air logistics in the blockchain technology era," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 178-191.
    32. Motokazu Ishizaka & Koichiro Tezuka & Masahiro Ishii, 2018. "Evaluation of risk attitude in the shipping freight market under uncertainty," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(8), pages 1042-1056, November.
    33. Zheng, Wei & Li, Bo & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Effects of risk-aversion on competing shipping lines’ pricing strategies with uncertain demands," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 337-356.
    34. Chun‐Hung Chiu & Tsan‐Ming Choi & Xin Dai & Bin Shen & Jin‐Hui Zheng, 2018. "Optimal Advertising Budget Allocation in Luxury Fashion Markets with Social Influences: A Mean‐Variance Analysis," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(8), pages 1611-1629, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Guangxia & Gong, Yeming & Hong, Xianpei, 2022. "Free rider effect of quality information disclosure in remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Li, Yanan & Li, Xiang & Zhang, Sicheng, 2021. "Optimal pricing of customized bus services and ride-sharing based on a competitive game model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Fa Zhang & Yimiao Gu, 2022. "Approach to an Equivalent Freight-Based Sustainable Joint-Quotation Strategy for Shipping Blockchain Alliance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Wang, Bi & Chin, Kwai Sang & Su, Qin, 2022. "Prevention and adaptation to diversified risks in the seaport–dry port system under asymmetric risk behaviors: Invest earlier or wait?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 11-36.
    5. Jing Chen & Tsan-Ming Choi & Yu Amy Xia & Xiaohang Yue, 2020. "Preface: advances of real-case based operations research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 1-4, August.
    6. Mitręga, Maciej & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "How small-and-medium transportation companies handle asymmetric customer relationships under COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-method study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Sun, Xuting & Chung, Sai-Ho & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Ma, Hoi Lam, 2020. "Combating lead-time uncertainty in global supply chain's shipment-assignment: Is it wise to be risk-averse?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 406-434.
    8. Zhong, Huiling & Zhang, Fa & Gu, Yimiao, 2021. "A Stackelberg game based two-stage framework to make decisions of freight rate for container shipping lines in the emerging blockchain-based market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Niu, Baozhuang & Xu, Haotao & Xie, Fengfeng, 2021. "Free shipping in cross-border supply chains considering tax disparity and carrier’s pricing decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Dixit, Aasheesh & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Kumar, Patanjal & Jakhar, Suresh K., 2024. "Roles of reciprocity and fairness concerns in airline-airport systems with environmental considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 1011-1023.
    11. Pierre Cariou & Patrice Guillotreau, 2022. "Capacity management by global shipping alliances: findings from a game experiment," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(1), pages 41-66, March.
    12. Zhang, Li-Hao & Liu, Chunxiao & Zhang, Cheng & Wang, Shanshan, 2023. "Upstream encroachment and downstream outsourcing in competing shipping supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    13. Zheng, Wei & Li, Bo & Song, Dongping, 2022. "The optimal green strategies for competitive ocean carriers under potential regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 840-856.
    14. Rufeng Wang & Xiongwei Zhou & Bo Li, 2022. "Pricing strategy of dual-channel supply chain with a risk-averse retailer considering consumers’ channel preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(1), pages 305-324, February.
    15. Jianteng Xu & Qingguo Bai & Qian Luo, 2023. "Energy conservation strategy and coordination of a closed-loop supply chain with risk-averse members under carbon tax regulation," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1-39, September.
    16. Wang, Jian & Zhu, Wenbo, 2023. "Analyzing the development of competition and cooperation among ocean carriers considering the impact of carbon tax policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    17. Liu, Lu & Feng, Lipan & Jiang, Tao & Zhang, Qian, 2021. "The impact of supply chain competition on the introduction of clean development mechanisms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Wei & Li, Bo & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Effects of risk-aversion on competing shipping lines’ pricing strategies with uncertain demands," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 337-356.
    2. Wang, Fan & Yang, Xiao & Zhuo, Xiaopo & Xiong, Minghua, 2019. "Joint logistics and financial services by a 3PL firm: Effects of risk preference and demand volatility," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 312-328.
    3. Wang, Kelly Yujie & Wen, Yuan & Yip, Tsz Leung & Fan, Zuojun, 2021. "Carrier-shipper risk management and coordination in the presence of spot freight market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Li, Xiang & Qi, Xiangtong & Li, Yongjian, 2021. "On sales effort and pricing decisions under alternative risk criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 603-614.
    5. Liu, Jiaguo & Wang, Junjin, 2019. "Carrier alliance incentive analysis and coordination in a maritime transport chain based on service competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 333-355.
    6. Sun, Qinghe & Li, Wei & Meng, Qiang, 2024. "Single-leg shipping revenue management for expedited services with ambiguous elasticity in transit-time-sensitive demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    7. Wang, Yadong & Meng, Qiang, 2021. "Optimizing freight rate of spot market containers with uncertainties in shipping demand and available ship capacity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 314-332.
    8. Meng, Qiang & Zhao, Hui & Wang, Yadong, 2019. "Revenue management for container liner shipping services: Critical review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 280-292.
    9. Niu, Baozhuang & Dai, Zhipeng & Zhuo, Xiaopo, 2019. "Co-opetition effect of promised-delivery-time sensitive demand on air cargo carriers’ big data investment and demand signal sharing decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 29-44.
    10. Juzhi Zhang & Suresh P. Sethi & Tsan‐Ming Choi & T. C. E. Cheng, 2020. "Supply Chains Involving a Mean‐Variance‐Skewness‐Kurtosis Newsvendor: Analysis and Coordination," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(6), pages 1397-1430, June.
    11. Zheng, Wei & Li, Bo & Song, Dongping, 2022. "The optimal green strategies for competitive ocean carriers under potential regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 840-856.
    12. Wei, Wanying & Liu, Weihua & Tang, Ou & Dong, Chuanwen & Liang, Yanjie, 2023. "CSR investment for a two-sided platform: Network externality and risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 694-712.
    13. Wang, Di & Liu, Weihua & Shen, Xinran & Wei, Wanying, 2019. "Service order allocation under uncertain demand: Risk aversion, peer competition, and relationship strength," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 293-311.
    14. Wang, Fan & Zhuo, Xiaopo & Niu, Baozhuang & He, Jiayi, 2017. "Who canvasses for cargos? Incentive analysis and channel structure in a shipping supply chain," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 78-101.
    15. Song, Zhuzhu & Tang, Wansheng & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2019. "Encroachment and canvassing strategy in a sea-cargo service chain with empty container repositioning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 175-186.
    16. Wang, Junjin & Liu, Jiaguo, 2019. "Vertical contract selection under chain-to-chain service competition in shipping supply chain," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 184-196.
    17. Lai, Xiaofan & Tao, Yi & Wang, Fan & Zou, Zongbao, 2019. "Sustainability investment in maritime supply chain with risk behavior and information sharing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 16-29.
    18. Sun, Xuting & Chung, Sai-Ho & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Ma, Hoi Lam, 2020. "Combating lead-time uncertainty in global supply chain's shipment-assignment: Is it wise to be risk-averse?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 406-434.
    19. Zhang, Li-Hao & Zhang, Yang-Guang & Wang, Shan-Shan, 2022. "Ocean shipping company’s encroachment with outsourcing competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Chun-Hung Chiu & Tsan-Ming Choi, 2016. "Supply chain risk analysis with mean-variance models: a technical review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(2), pages 489-507, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:133:y:2020:i:c:p:210-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.