IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6488-d1445468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization Model and Solution Algorithm for Space Station Cargo Supply Planning under Complex Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Zhijuan Kang

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Ming Gao

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
    Reliability Assurance Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
    Operation and Management Support Center of China Manned Space Program, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Wei Dang

    (Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
    Reliability Assurance Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Jiajie Wang

    (Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China)

Abstract

To enhance the efficient utilization of space resources, it is critical to integrate information from various systems of the space station and formulate scientific and effective methods for planning cargo supplies. Considering the large-scale, multi-objective, complex nonlinear, non-convex, non-differentiable, and mixed-integer characteristics, this study decomposes the space station cargo supply planning problem into a bi-level optimization problem involving cargo manifest and loading layout iterations. A new CILPSO algorithm is proposed to solve this by integrating particle coding, reliability priority, and random generation mechanisms of population initialization, global and local versions of particle updating, and a local search strategy. The experimental results show that the CILPSO algorithm outperforms other algorithms regarding search performance and convergence efficiency. The proposed approach can effectively reduce the cargo supply cost of the space station and improve the output of space science and application achievements. It provides a decision-making basis for the responsible department to develop cargo supply schemes, for the cargo supply systems to submit cargo demands, and for the cargo spaceship system to design loading schemes. This study advances the logistics sustainability of the space station.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhijuan Kang & Ming Gao & Wei Dang & Jiajie Wang, 2024. "Optimization Model and Solution Algorithm for Space Station Cargo Supply Planning under Complex Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6488-:d:1445468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6488/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6488/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iris, Çağatay & Christensen, Jonas & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan, 2018. "Flexible ship loading problem with transfer vehicle assignment and scheduling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 113-134.
    2. Michel Povlovitsch Seixas & André Bergsten Mendes & Marcos Ribeiro Pereira Barretto & Claudio Barbieri da Cunha & Marco Antonio Brinati & Roberto Edward Cruz & Yue Wu & Philip A Wilson, 2016. "A heuristic approach to stowing general cargo into platform supply vessels," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(1), pages 148-158, January.
    3. Brandt, Felix & Nickel, Stefan, 2019. "The air cargo load planning problem - a consolidated problem definition and literature review on related problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 399-410.
    4. Yue-he Zhu & Ya-zhong Luo, 2016. "Multi-objective optimisation and decision-making of space station logistics strategies," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(13), pages 3132-3148, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jone R. Hansen & Kjetil Fagerholt & Magnus Stålhane & Jørgen G. Rakke, 2020. "An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for the planar storage location assignment problem: application to stowage planning for Roll-on Roll-off ships," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 885-912, December.
    2. Mao, Anjia & Yu, Tiantian & Ding, Zhaohao & Fang, Sidun & Guo, Jinran & Sheng, Qianqian, 2022. "Optimal scheduling for seaport integrated energy system considering flexible berth allocation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    3. Domenico Gattuso & Domenica Savia Pellicanò, 2023. "HUs Fleet Management in an Automated Container Port: Assessment by a Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Sebastian Twaróg & Krzysztof Szwarc & Martyna Wronka-Pośpiech & Małgorzata Dobrowolska & Anna Urbanek, 2021. "Multiple probabilistic traveling salesman problem in the coordination of drug transportation—In the context of sustainability goals and Industry 4.0," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Gao, Yinping & Zhen, Lu, 2024. "A decision framework for decomposed stowage planning for containers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    6. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    7. Cheng Hong & Yufang Guo & Yuhong Wang & Tingting Li, 2023. "The Integrated Scheduling Optimization for Container Handling by Using Driverless Electric Truck in Automated Container Terminal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Erdem Agbas & Ali Osman Kusakci, 2021. "A simulation approach for aircraft cargo loading considering weight and balance constraints," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 3(1), pages 21-31, January.
    9. Kong, Lingrui & Ji, Mingjun & Gao, Zhendi, 2021. "Joint optimization of container slot planning and truck scheduling for tandem quay cranes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 149-166.
    10. Rune Larsen & Dario Pacino, 2021. "A heuristic and a benchmark for the stowage planning problem," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 94-122, March.
    11. Alice Vasconcelos Nobre & Caio Cézar Rodrigues Oliveira & Denilson Ricardo de Lucena Nunes & André Cristiano Silva Melo & Gil Eduardo Guimarães & Rosley Anholon & Vitor William Batista Martins, 2022. "Analysis of Decision Parameters for Route Plans and Their Importance for Sustainability: An Exploratory Study Using the TOPSIS Technique," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-12, May.
    12. Weilin Tang & Xinghan Chen & Maoxiang Lang & Shiqi Li & Yuying Liu & Wenyu Li, 2024. "Optimization of Truck–Cargo Online Matching for the Less-Than-Truck-Load Logistics Hub under Real-Time Demand," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-31, March.
    13. Ercan Kurtulus & Ismail Bilge Cetin, 2019. "Assessing the Environmental Benefits of Dry Port Usage: A Case of Inland Container Transport in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Shufan Zhu & Kefan Xie & Ping Gui, 2021. "Dynamic Adjustment Mechanism and Differential Game Model Construction of Mask Emergency Supply Chain Cooperation Based on COVID-19 Outbreak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    15. Byung Kwon Lee & Joyce M. W. Low, 2022. "A constraint programming approach to capacity planning in container vessels," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 415-438, June.
    16. Evangelos Gkanatsas & Harold Krikke, 2020. "Towards a Pro-Silience Framework: A Literature Review on Quantitative Modelling of Resilient 3PL Supply Chain Network Designs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    17. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2019. "Planning an Intermodal Terminal for the Sustainable Transport Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Iris, Çağatay & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "A review of energy efficiency in ports: Operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 170-182.
    19. Xiangling Zhao & Yun Dong & Lei Zuo, 2023. "A Combinatorial Optimization Approach for Air Cargo Palletization and Aircraft Loading," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Simon Emde & Hamid Abedinnia & Anne Lange & Christoph H. Glock, 2020. "Scheduling personnel for the build-up of unit load devices at an air cargo terminal with limited space," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(2), pages 397-426, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6488-:d:1445468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.