IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v338y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-024-05855-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-objective competency-based decision support system for the assignment of internal auditors to multiple projects

Author

Listed:
  • Xiong Wang

    (BRU-IUL, University Institute of Lisbon
    University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

  • Fernando A. F. Ferreira

    (BRU-IUL, University Institute of Lisbon
    University of Memphis)

  • Pengyu Yan

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

Abstract

Internal audit is an independent function that provides objective assurance and advisory services to business partners in the form of projects. As the skilled human resources, internal auditors play a significant role in ensuring audit quality and thus should be managed properly. However, there are only very few studies on auditor-project assignment problems at the operational level. Also, many studies on general team formation problems neglect the real-life implications of simplifying mathematical models to enable practitioners to understand and implement. To bridge these gaps, this study presents a new integrated two-phase approach to assign internal auditors to multiple projects. In the designed decision support model, a harmonious level index is firstly proposed, measuring the suitability between auditor capability and project characteristics using a simplified fuzzy filter ranking method. Then, Min–Max multi-choice goal programming (MMCGP) model provides the assignment solution that balances internal auditors’ multi-dimensional fit to the projects and their preferences, and thus optimizes the productivity of internal audit projects and staff’s job satisfaction. A real case study is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed model and its solution. The comparison results further show that the proposed model outperforms the manual operations and the exiting approaches in the literature. This research extends the existing literature on auditor assignment problem by developing a flexible decision support tool and a practical classification of auditor competency. The MMCGP approach also provides an ideal staff assignment solution by setting multiple aspiration levels for each goal and balancing the unwanted deviations among goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiong Wang & Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Pengyu Yan, 2024. "A multi-objective competency-based decision support system for the assignment of internal auditors to multiple projects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 303-334, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:338:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-05855-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-05855-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-05855-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-024-05855-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Xiong & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2022. "Multi-objective competency-based approach to project scheduling and staff assignment: Case study of an internal audit project," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Amr Kotb & Alan Sangster & David Henderson, 2014. "E-business internal audit: the elephant is still in the room!," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(1), pages 43-63, May.
    3. Mary Brady Greenawalt, 1997. "The internal auditor and the critical thinking process: a closer look," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 80-86, March.
    4. Mélanie Roussy & Alexandre Perron, 2018. "New Perspectives in Internal Audit Research: A Structured Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 345-385, September.
    5. Gene Smith, 2005. "Communication skills are critical for internal auditors," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(5), pages 513-519, June.
    6. Nathanaël Betti & Gerrit Sarens & Ingrid Poncin, 2021. "Effects of digitalisation of organisations on internal audit activities and practices," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(6), pages 872-888, August.
    7. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-09-2014-0100 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Ethem Çanakoğlu & İbrahim Muter, 2021. "Identical parallel machine scheduling with discrete additional resource and an application in audit scheduling," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(17), pages 5321-5336, September.
    9. Sutana Narkchai & Faudziah Hanim Binti Fadzil, 2017. "The Communication Skill on the Performance of Internal Auditors in Thailand Public Limited Company," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(4), pages 1-5.
    10. Amr Kotb & Alan Sangster & David Henderson, 2014. "E-business internal audit: the elephant is still in the room!," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(1), pages 43-63, May.
    11. Fatih Cavdur & Asli Sebatli & Merve Kose-Kucuk & Cagla Rodoplu, 2019. "A two-phase binary-goal programming-based approach for optimal project-team formation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(4), pages 689-706, April.
    12. Inshik Seol & Joseph Sarkis & Zhihong (Rita) Wang, 2017. "A cross-cultural comparative study of internal auditor skills: UK vs Korea," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 341-355, September.
    13. De Bruecker, Philippe & Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & Demeulemeester, Erik, 2015. "Workforce planning incorporating skills: State of the art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 1-16.
    14. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid, 2018. "Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 462-471.
    15. Fengchun Tang & Carolyn Strand Norman & Valaria P. Vendrzyk, 2017. "Exploring perceptions of data analytics in the internal audit function," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(11), pages 1125-1136, November.
    16. Amr Kotb & Alan Sangster & David Henderson, 2014. "E-business internal audit: the elephant is still in the room!," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 15(1), pages 43-63.
    17. Flavell, RB, 1976. "A new goal programming formulation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 4(6), pages 731-732.
    18. Gamermann, Ronaldo W. & Ferreira, Luciano & Borenstein, Denis, 2023. "Long-term audit staff scheduling and planning: A case study of Brazilian civil aviation authority," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    19. Ethem Çanakoğlu & İbrahim Muter & Onur Adanur, 2018. "Audit Scheduling in Banking Sector," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Andreas Fink & Armin Fügenschuh & Martin Josef Geiger (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2016, pages 499-505, Springer.
    20. Konstantinos Petridis & Georgios Drogalas & Eleni Zografidou, 2021. "Internal auditor selection using a TOPSIS/non-linear programming model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 513-539, January.
    21. Yaghoobi, M.A. & Tamiz, M., 2007. "A method for solving fuzzy goal programming problems based on MINMAX approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1580-1590, March.
    22. Tung-Hsien Wu & Shi-Ming Huang & Shaio Yan Huang & David C. Yen, 2017. "The effect of competencies, team problem-solving ability, and computer audit activity on internal audit performance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1133-1148, October.
    23. Rindu Rika Gamayuni, 2018. "The effect of internal auditor competence and objectivity, and management support on effectiveness of internal audit function and financial reporting quality implications at local government," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3), pages 248-261.
    24. Sana Bouajaja & Najoua Dridi, 2017. "A survey on human resource allocation problem and its applications," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 339-369, July.
    25. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-10-2012-0072 is not listed on IDEAS
    26. O Ganjavi & B Aouni & Z Wang, 2002. "Technical note on balanced solutions in goal programming, compromise programming and reference point method," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(8), pages 927-929, August.
    27. Chang, Ching-Ter, 2007. "Multi-choice goal programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 389-396, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xiong & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2022. "Multi-objective competency-based approach to project scheduling and staff assignment: Case study of an internal audit project," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. da Silva, Aneirson Francisco & Marins, Fernando Augusto Silva, 2014. "A Fuzzy Goal Programming model for solving aggregate production-planning problems under uncertainty: A case study in a Brazilian sugar mill," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 196-204.
    3. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Bettahar, Samir & Benbouziane, Mohamed, 2018. "Optimizing renewable energy portfolios under uncertainty: A multi-segment fuzzy goal programming approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 540-552.
    4. Şeyda Gür & Tamer Eren, 2018. "Scheduling and Planning in Service Systems with Goal Programming: Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Stéphane Lhuillery & Marion Tellechea & Stéphanie Thiery, 2021. "Open innovation in managerial innovation: the case of internal audit," Working Papers of BETA 2021-19, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    6. Hocine, Amin & Zhuang, Zheng-Yun & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Li, Der-Chiang, 2020. "Weighted-additive fuzzy multi-choice goal programming (WA-FMCGP) for supporting renewable energy site selection decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 642-654.
    7. Konstantinos Petridis & Georgios Drogalas & Eleni Zografidou, 2021. "Internal auditor selection using a TOPSIS/non-linear programming model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 513-539, January.
    8. Zheng-Yun Zhuang & Chi-Kit Ho & Paul Juinn Bing Tan & Jia-Ming Ying & Jin-Hua Chen, 2020. "The Optimal Setting of A/B Exam Papers without Item Pools: A Hybrid Approach of IRT and BGP," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    9. Nurullah Umarusman, 2018. "Fuzzy Goal Programming Problem Based on Minmax Approach for Optimal System Design," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 6(1), pages 177-192, June.
    10. Romero, Carlos, 2004. "A general structure of achievement function for a goal programming model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(3), pages 675-686, March.
    11. Jones, D.F. & Treloar, R. & Ouelhadj, D. & Glampedakis, A. & Bartmeyer, P., 2024. "Incorporation of poverty principles into goal programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    12. Thiéry, Stéphanie & Lhuillery, Stephane & Tellechea, Marion, 2023. "How can governance, human capital, and communication practices enhance internal audit quality?," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    13. Gamermann, Ronaldo W. & Ferreira, Luciano & Borenstein, Denis, 2023. "Long-term audit staff scheduling and planning: A case study of Brazilian civil aviation authority," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    14. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    15. Hamalainen, Raimo P. & Mantysaari, Juha, 2002. "Dynamic multi-objective heating optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Ghazale Kordi & Parsa Hasanzadeh-Moghimi & Mohammad Mahdi Paydar & Ebrahim Asadi-Gangraj, 2023. "A multi-objective location-routing model for dental waste considering environmental factors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 755-792, September.
    17. Alireza Pooya & Morteza Pakdaman, 2021. "A new continuous time optimal control model for manpower planning with promotion from inside the system," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 349-364, March.
    18. Opacic, Luke & Sowlati, Taraneh & Mobini, Mahdi, 2018. "Design and development of a simulation-based decision support tool to improve the production process at an engineered wood products mill," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 209-219.
    19. Symitsi, Efthymia & Stamolampros, Panagiotis & Daskalakis, George & Korfiatis, Nikolaos, 2021. "The informational value of employee online reviews," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 605-619.
    20. Steven DeSimone & Giuseppe D’Onza & Gerrit Sarens, 2019. "Correlates of Internal Audit Function Maturity," Working Papers 1905, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:338:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-05855-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.