IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v45y2014icp196-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy Goal Programming model for solving aggregate production-planning problems under uncertainty: A case study in a Brazilian sugar mill

Author

Listed:
  • da Silva, Aneirson Francisco
  • Marins, Fernando Augusto Silva

Abstract

This paper proposes a Fuzzy Goal Programming model (FGP) for a real aggregate production-planning problem. To do so, an application was made in a Brazilian Sugar and Ethanol Milling Company. The FGP Model depicts the comprehensive production process of sugar, ethanol, molasses and derivatives, and considers the uncertainties involved in ethanol and sugar production. Decision-makings, related to the agricultural and logistics phases, were considered on a weekly-basis planning horizon to include the whole harvesting season and the periods between harvests. The research has provided interesting results about decisions in the agricultural stages of cutting, loading and transportation to sugarcane suppliers and, especially, in milling decisions, whose choice of production process includes storage and logistics distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • da Silva, Aneirson Francisco & Marins, Fernando Augusto Silva, 2014. "A Fuzzy Goal Programming model for solving aggregate production-planning problems under uncertainty: A case study in a Brazilian sugar mill," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 196-204.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:45:y:2014:i:c:p:196-204
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988314001625
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flavell, RB, 1976. "A new goal programming formulation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 4(6), pages 731-732.
    2. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    3. Yaghoobi, M.A. & Tamiz, M., 2007. "A method for solving fuzzy goal programming problems based on MINMAX approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1580-1590, March.
    4. Rafael Paiva & Reinaldo Morabito, 2009. "An optimization model for the aggregate production planning of a Brazilian sugar and ethanol milling company," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 117-130, July.
    5. Chang, Ching-Ter, 2007. "Multi-choice goal programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 389-396, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu, L. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Fan, Y.R. & Nie, S., 2018. "A copula-based flexible-stochastic programming method for planning regional energy system under multiple uncertainties: A case study of the urban agglomeration of Beijing and Tianjin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 60-74.
    2. Cinzia Colapinto & Raja Jayaraman & Simone Marsiglio, 2017. "Multi-criteria decision analysis with goal programming in engineering, management and social sciences: a state-of-the art review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 7-40, April.
    3. Junqueira, Rogerio de Ávila Ribeiro & Morabito, Reinaldo, 2019. "Modeling and solving a sugarcane harvest front scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 150-160.
    4. Dmitry I. Ignatov & Sergey I. Nikolenko & Taimuraz Abaev & Jonas Poelmans, 2014. "Improving Quality Of Service For Radio Station Hosting: An Online Recommender System Based On Information Fusion," HSE Working papers WP BRP 31/MAN/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    5. Thadeu Gasparetto & Carlos Fernandez-Jardon & Angel Barajas, 2014. "Brand Teams And Distribution Of Wealth In Brazilian State Championships," HSE Working papers WP BRP 30/MAN/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    6. Donya Rahmani & Arash Zandi & Sara Behdad & Arezou Entezaminia, 2021. "A light robust model for aggregate production planning with consideration of environmental impacts of machines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 273-297, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Bettahar, Samir & Benbouziane, Mohamed, 2018. "Optimizing renewable energy portfolios under uncertainty: A multi-segment fuzzy goal programming approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 540-552.
    2. Hocine, Amin & Zhuang, Zheng-Yun & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Li, Der-Chiang, 2020. "Weighted-additive fuzzy multi-choice goal programming (WA-FMCGP) for supporting renewable energy site selection decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 642-654.
    3. Xiong Wang & Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Pengyu Yan, 2024. "A multi-objective competency-based decision support system for the assignment of internal auditors to multiple projects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 303-334, July.
    4. Nurullah Umarusman, 2018. "Fuzzy Goal Programming Problem Based on Minmax Approach for Optimal System Design," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 6(1), pages 177-192, June.
    5. Mike Spiliotis & Dionissis Latinopoulos & Lampros Vasiliades & Kyriakos Rafailidis & Eleni Koutsokera & Ifigenia Kagalou, 2022. "Flexible Goal Programming for Supporting Lake Karla’s (Greece) Sustainable Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine, 2020. "XOR analytic hierarchy process and its application in the renewable energy sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Gezen, Mesliha & Karaaslan, Abdulkerim, 2022. "Energy planning based on Vision-2023 of Turkey with a goal programming under fuzzy multi-objectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    8. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar & Cañal-Fernández, Verónica, 2016. "A model based on Copula Theory for sustainable and social responsible investments," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 55-76.
    9. Hu, Chao-Fang & Teng, Chang-Jun & Li, Shao-Yuan, 2007. "A fuzzy goal programming approach to multi-objective optimization problem with priorities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1319-1333, February.
    10. Zheng-Yun Zhuang & Chi-Kit Ho & Paul Juinn Bing Tan & Jia-Ming Ying & Jin-Hua Chen, 2020. "The Optimal Setting of A/B Exam Papers without Item Pools: A Hybrid Approach of IRT and BGP," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    11. Yaghoobi, M.A. & Tamiz, M., 2007. "A method for solving fuzzy goal programming problems based on MINMAX approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1580-1590, March.
    12. Shalabh Singh & Sonia Singh, 2022. "Shipment in a multi-choice environment: a case study of shipping carriers in US," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(4), pages 1195-1219, December.
    13. Yu-Jwo Tao & Yi-Shyuan Lin & Hsuan-Shih Lee & Guo-Ya Gan & Chang-Shu Tu, 2022. "Using a Product Life Cycle Cost Model to Solve Supplier Selection Problems in a Sustainable, Resilient Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Şeyda Gür & Tamer Eren, 2018. "Scheduling and Planning in Service Systems with Goal Programming: Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Jones, D.F. & Treloar, R. & Ouelhadj, D. & Glampedakis, A. & Bartmeyer, P., 2024. "Incorporation of poverty principles into goal programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    16. Vuciterna, Rina & Thomsen, Michael & Popp, Jennie & Musliu, Arben, 2017. "Efficiency and Competitiveness of Kosovo Raspberry Producers," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252770, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    17. Gourav Gupta & Shivani & Deepika Rani, 2024. "Neutrosophic goal programming approach for multi-objective fixed-charge transportation problem with neutrosophic parameters," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(3), pages 1274-1300, September.
    18. Berna Tektas Sivrikaya & Ferhan Cebi & Hasan Hüseyin Turan & Nihat Kasap & Dursun Delen, 2017. "A fuzzy long-term investment planning model for a GenCo in a hybrid electricity market considering climate change impacts," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 975-991, October.
    19. Collan, Mikael, 2008. "New Method for Real Option Valuation Using Fuzzy Numbers," Working Papers 466, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    20. Kim, Jong Soon & Whang, Kyu-Seung, 1998. "A tolerance approach to the fuzzy goal programming problems with unbalanced triangular membership function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 614-624, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Aggregate production planning; Goal Programming; Fuzzy Goal Programming; Sugar and ethanol mills;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • C65 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:45:y:2014:i:c:p:196-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.