IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v199y2018icp209-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and development of a simulation-based decision support tool to improve the production process at an engineered wood products mill

Author

Listed:
  • Opacic, Luke
  • Sowlati, Taraneh
  • Mobini, Mahdi

Abstract

The demand for engineered wood products has been increasing due to their advantages over solid wood in many applications and the need for efficient and sustainable use of natural resources. In order to meet the growing demand of products, managers seek continuous improvement in the production process, which involves complex and interrelated decisions. Simulation-based decision support tools are proven beneficial when dealing with complex managerial decisions, especially in manufacturing systems. In this research, real industrial data are used and a decision support tool is developed to assist the managers of an engineered wood products mill in Canada to analyze the production process, and evaluate alternative configurations and workers assignment to increase the throughput. This paper presents the first attempt in the forest industry simulation literature that incorporates the interactions between the operators and multiple machines. An important outcome of this research was to prevent substantial monetary implications of replacing a piece of equipment. While managers believed that replacing a piece of equipment (sizer) with a more modern one would eliminate the production bottleneck and increase the throughput, the results of the simulation model showed that it would only shift the bottleneck in the mill without any meaningful benefits. The evaluation of worker-machine interactions within the entire mill provided another important finding. It indicated that the addition of a worker and the automation of the conveyor could increase the throughput by almost 21%.

Suggested Citation

  • Opacic, Luke & Sowlati, Taraneh & Mobini, Mahdi, 2018. "Design and development of a simulation-based decision support tool to improve the production process at an engineered wood products mill," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 209-219.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:199:y:2018:i:c:p:209-219
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527318301270
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robinson, Stewart & Radnor, Zoe J. & Burgess, Nicola & Worthington, Claire, 2012. "SimLean: Utilising simulation in the implementation of lean in healthcare," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 188-197.
    2. De Bruecker, Philippe & Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & Demeulemeester, Erik, 2015. "Workforce planning incorporating skills: State of the art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 1-16.
    3. Petrit (Pete) Dode & Michael Greig & Saeed Zolfaghari & W. Patrick Neumann, 2016. "Integrating human factors into discrete event simulation: a proactive approach to simultaneously design for system performance and employees’ well being," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 3105-3117, May.
    4. Pool, Arnout & Wijngaard, Jacob & van der Zee, Durk-Jouke, 2011. "Lean planning in the semi-process industry, a case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 194-203, May.
    5. Jahangirian, Mohsen & Eldabi, Tillal & Naseer, Aisha & Stergioulas, Lampros K. & Young, Terry, 2010. "Simulation in manufacturing and business: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vítor Silva & Luís Pinto Ferreira & Francisco J. G. Silva & Benny Tjahjono & Paulo Ávila, 2021. "Simulation-Based Decision Support System to Improve Material Flow of a Textile Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robinson, Stewart & Kotiadis, Kathy, 2016. "Can involving clients in simulation studies help them solve their future problems? A transfer of learning experimentAuthor-Name: Monks, Thomas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 919-930.
    2. Patricia Heuser & Peter Letmathe & Matthias Schinner, 2022. "Workforce planning in production with flexible or budgeted employee training and volatile demand," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(7), pages 1093-1124, September.
    3. Harper, Alison & Mustafee, Navonil & Yearworth, Mike, 2021. "Facets of trust in simulation studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 197-213.
    4. Heuser, Patricia & Tauer, Björn, 2023. "Single-machine scheduling with product category-based learning and forgetting effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Thomas Vempiliyath & Maitri Thakur & Vincent Hargaden, 2021. "Development of a Hybrid Simulation Framework for the Production Planning Process in the Atlantic Salmon Supply Chain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Symitsi, Efthymia & Stamolampros, Panagiotis & Daskalakis, George & Korfiatis, Nikolaos, 2021. "The informational value of employee online reviews," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 605-619.
    7. Lotfi Hidri & Achraf Gazdar & Mohammed M. Mabkhot, 2020. "Optimized Procedure to Schedule Physicians in an Intensive Care Unit: A Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Maxim A. Maron, 2018. "Diagnostics of Projects," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 18-30.
    9. Navonil Mustafee & Korina Katsaliaki & Paul Fishwick, 2014. "Exploring the modelling and simulation knowledge base through journal co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2145-2159, March.
    10. Doumic, Marie & Perthame, Benoît & Ribes, Edouard & Salort, Delphine & Toubiana, Nathan, 2017. "Toward an integrated workforce planning framework using structured equations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 217-230.
    11. Pawel Pawlewski, 2021. "Customized Lean 3D Simulation Environment for Intralogistics," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 658-669.
    12. Deepa Mishra & Sameer Kumar & Elkafi Hassini, 2019. "Current trends in disaster management simulation modelling research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1387-1411, December.
    13. Christian Wankmüller & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Coordination, cooperation and collaboration in relief supply chain management," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 239-276, March.
    14. Sgarbossa, Fabio & Russo, Ivan, 2017. "A proactive model in sustainable food supply chain: Insight from a case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 596-606.
    15. Korytkowski, Przemyslaw & Malachowski, Bartlomiej, 2019. "Competence-based estimation of activity duration in IT projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 708-720.
    16. Erhard, Melanie & Schoenfelder, Jan & Fügener, Andreas & Brunner, Jens O., 2018. "State of the art in physician scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 1-18.
    17. Zhang, Zizhen & Qin, Hu & Wang, Kai & He, Huang & Liu, Tian, 2017. "Manpower allocation and vehicle routing problem in non-emergency ambulance transfer service," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 45-59.
    18. Diego Tlapa & Ignacio Franco-Alucano & Jorge Limon-Romero & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Guilherme Tortorella, 2022. "Lean, Six Sigma, and Simulation: Evidence from Healthcare Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    19. Delorme, Xavier & Dolgui, Alexandre & Kovalev, Sergey & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2019. "Minimizing the number of workers in a paced mixed-model assembly line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 188-194.
    20. Snauwaert, Jakob & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2023. "A classification and new benchmark instances for the multi-skilled resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 1-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:199:y:2018:i:c:p:209-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.