IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v305y2021i1d10.1007_s10479-021-04083-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enforcing fair cooperation in production-inventory settings with heterogeneous agents

Author

Listed:
  • Luis A. Guardiola

    (Universidad de Alicante)

  • Ana Meca

    (Universidad Miguel Hernández)

  • Justo Puerto

    (Universidad de Sevilla)

Abstract

Production-Inventory settings with heterogeneous agents appear frequently in the study of supply chain management. For instance, there are Production-Inventory situations in which certain agents are essential as they can reduce the costs of other agents (followers) when they cooperate with each other. The study of such a cooperation can be modelled by means of a cooperative game and studied finding fair cost allocations. These class of cooperative games was introduced in Guardiola et al. (in Games Econ Behav 65:205–219, 2009) where it was also proposed the Owen point. This cost allocation is an appealing solution concept that for Production-Inventory games (PI-games) is always stable, in the sense of the core. The Owen point allows all the players in the game to operate at minimum cost but it does not take into account the cost reduction induced by essential players over their followers. Thus, it may be seen as an altruistic allocation for essential players what can be criticized. The aim of this paper is two-fold: to introduce new core allocations for PI-games improving the weaknesses of the Owen point and to study the structure and complexity of set of stable cost allocations (the core) of PI-games.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis A. Guardiola & Ana Meca & Justo Puerto, 2021. "Enforcing fair cooperation in production-inventory settings with heterogeneous agents," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 59-80, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:305:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04083-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04083-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04083-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-04083-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kar, Anirban & Mitra, Manipushpak & Mutuswami, Suresh, 2009. "On the coincidence of the prenucleolus and the Shapley value," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 16-25, January.
    2. Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers & Ruud Hendrickx, 2001. "Operations research games: A survey," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 9(2), pages 139-199, December.
    3. Sprumont, Yves, 1990. "Population monotonic allocation schemes for cooperative games with transferable utility," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 378-394, December.
    4. SCHMEIDLER, David, 1969. "The nucleolus of a characteristic function game," LIDAM Reprints CORE 44, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. Guardiola, Luis A. & Meca, Ana & Puerto, Justo, 2009. "Production-inventory games: A new class of totally balanced combinatorial optimization games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 205-219, January.
    6. Fiestras-Janeiro, M.G. & García-Jurado, I. & Meca, A. & Mosquera, M.A., 2011. "Cooperative game theory and inventory management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 459-466, May.
    7. Shapley, Lloyd S. & Shubik, Martin, 1969. "On market games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 9-25, June.
    8. Shanfeng Zhu & Xiaotie Deng & Maocheng Cai & Qizhi Fang, 2002. "On computational complexity of membership test in flow games and linear production games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 31(1), pages 39-45.
    9. Guardiola, Luis A. & Meca, Ana & Puerto, Justo, 2008. "Production-inventory games and PMAS-games: Characterizations of the Owen point," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 96-108, July.
    10. Hamers, Herbert & Klijn, Flip & Solymosi, Tamas & Tijs, Stef & Pere Villar, Joan, 2002. "Assignment Games Satisfy the CoMa-Property," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 231-239, February.
    11. Perea, Federico & Puerto, Justo & Fernández, Francisco R., 2012. "Avoiding unfairness of Owen allocations in linear production processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 125-131.
    12. M. Guajardo & M. Rönnqvist, 2015. "Cost allocation in inventory pools of spare parts with service-differentiated demand classes," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 220-237, January.
    13. Xiaotie Deng & Toshihide Ibaraki & Hiroshi Nagamochi, 1999. "Algorithmic Aspects of the Core of Combinatorial Optimization Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 751-766, August.
    14. Sotomayor, Marilda, 2003. "Some further remark on the core structure of the assignment game," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 261-265, December.
    15. Lloyd S. Shapley, 1967. "On balanced sets and cores," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 453-460.
    16. Kuipers, Jeroen, 1993. "On the Core of Information Graph Games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 21(4), pages 339-350.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ichiro Nishizaki & Tomohiro Hayashida & Shinya Sekizaki & Kenta Tanaka, 2023. "Averaged dual solution for linear production games and its characterization," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 523-555, June.
    2. G. Bergantiños & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2024. "Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(3), pages 1395-1417, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Guardiola & Ana Meca & Justo Puerto, 2020. "Quid Pro Quo allocations in Production-Inventory games," Papers 2002.00953, arXiv.org.
    2. Luis A. Guardiola & Ana Meca & Justo Puerto, 2022. "The effect of consolidated periods in heterogeneous lot-sizing games," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(2), pages 380-404, July.
    3. Drechsel, J. & Kimms, A., 2010. "Computing core allocations in cooperative games with an application to cooperative procurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 310-321, November.
    4. Lotty E. Westerink‐Duijzer & Loe P. J. Schlicher & Marieke Musegaas, 2020. "Core Allocations for Cooperation Problems in Vaccination," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1720-1737, July.
    5. Westerink-Duijzer, L.E. & Schlicher, L.P.J. & Musegaas, M., 2019. "Fair allocations for cooperation problems in vaccination," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2019-06, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    6. Frank Karsten & Marco Slikker & Geert‐Jan van Houtum, 2012. "Inventory pooling games for expensive, low‐demand spare parts," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(5), pages 311-324, August.
    7. Trudeau, Christian & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2020. "Clique games: A family of games with coincidence between the nucleolus and the Shapley value," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 8-14.
    8. Hamers, H.J.M. & Miquel, S. & Norde, H.W., 2011. "Monotonic Stable Solutions for Minimum Coloring Games," Other publications TiSEM efae8d09-83e6-4fe4-9623-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Li, Jun & Feng, Hairong & Zeng, Yinlian, 2014. "Inventory games with permissible delay in payments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 694-700.
    10. Takaaki Abe & Shuige Liu, 2019. "Monotonic core allocation paths for assignment games," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(4), pages 557-573, December.
    11. Feng, Hairong & Zeng, Yinlian & Cai, Xiaoqiang & Qian, Qian & Zhou, Yongwu, 2021. "Altruistic profit allocation rules for joint replenishment with carbon cap-and-trade policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 956-967.
    12. Hezarkhani, Behzad & Slikker, Marco & Van Woensel, Tom, 2018. "Collaborative replenishment in the presence of intermediaries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 135-146.
    13. Luis A. Guardiola & Ana Meca & Justo Puerto, 2021. "Unitary Owen Points in Cooperative Lot-Sizing Models with Backlogging," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Hamers, H.J.M. & Miquel, S. & Norde, H.W., 2011. "Monotonic Stable Solutions for Minimum Coloring Games," Discussion Paper 2011-016, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Guardiola, Luis A. & Meca, Ana & Puerto, Justo, 2009. "Production-inventory games: A new class of totally balanced combinatorial optimization games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 205-219, January.
    16. Ulaş Özen & Marco Slikker & Greys Sošić, 2022. "On the core of m$m$‐attribute games," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1770-1787, April.
    17. M Dror & B C Hartman, 2011. "Survey of cooperative inventory games and extensions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(4), pages 565-580, April.
    18. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2021. "A review of cooperative rules and their associated algorithms for minimum-cost spanning tree problems," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 12(1), pages 73-100, March.
    19. R. Branzei & E. Gutiérrez & N. Llorca & J. Sánchez-Soriano, 2021. "Does it make sense to analyse a two-sided market as a multi-choice game?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 301(1), pages 17-40, June.
    20. Yang, Jian & Li, Jianbin, 2020. "Cooperative game with nondeterministic returns," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 123-140.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:305:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04083-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.