IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v220y2012i1p125-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Avoiding unfairness of Owen allocations in linear production processes

Author

Listed:
  • Perea, Federico
  • Puerto, Justo
  • Fernández, Francisco R.

Abstract

This paper deals with cooperation situations in linear production problems in which a set of goods are to be produced from a set of resources so that a certain benefit function is maximized, assuming that resources not used in the production plan have no value by themselves. The Owen set is a well-known solution rule for the class of linear production processes. Despite their stability properties, Owen allocations might give null payoff to players that are necessary for optimal production plans. This paper shows that, in general, the aforementioned drawback cannot be avoided allowing only allocations within the core of the cooperative game associated to the original linear production process, and therefore a new solution set named EOwen is introduced. For any player whose resources are needed in at least one optimal production plan, the EOwen set contains at least one allocation that assigns a strictly positive payoff to such player.

Suggested Citation

  • Perea, Federico & Puerto, Justo & Fernández, Francisco R., 2012. "Avoiding unfairness of Owen allocations in linear production processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 125-131.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:220:y:2012:i:1:p:125-131
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221712000331
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Curiel, I. & Derks, J. & Tijs, S.H., 1989. "On balanced games and games with committee control," Other publications TiSEM 43993ad7-6225-435d-bfa4-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Molina, Elisenda & Tejada, Juan, 2004. "Linear production games with committee control: Limiting behaviour of the core," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(3), pages 609-625, May.
    3. Stefano Moretti & Fioravante Patrone, 2008. "Rejoinder on: Transversality of the Shapley value," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 60-61, July.
    4. Stefano Moretti & Fioravante Patrone, 2008. "Transversality of the Shapley value," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 1-41, July.
    5. Barış Çiftçi & Stef Tijs, 2009. "A vertex oriented approach to the equal remaining obligations rule for minimum cost spanning tree situations," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(2), pages 440-453, December.
    6. van Gellekom, J. R. G. & Potters, J. A. M. & Reijnierse, J. H. & Engel, M. C. & Tijs, S. H., 2000. "Characterization of the Owen Set of Linear Production Processes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 139-156, July.
    7. Tijs, S.H. & van Gellekom, J.R.G. & Potters, J.A.M. & Reijnierse, J.H. & Engel, M.C., 2000. "Characterization of the Owen set of linear production processes," Other publications TiSEM bdf0c618-e9f1-496a-b977-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Perea, F. & Puerto, J. & Fernández, F.R., 2009. "Modeling cooperation on a class of distribution problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 726-733, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ichiro Nishizaki & Tomohiro Hayashida & Shinya Sekizaki & Kenta Tanaka, 2023. "Averaged dual solution for linear production games and its characterization," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 523-555, June.
    2. Luis Guardiola & Ana Meca & Justo Puerto, 2020. "Quid Pro Quo allocations in Production-Inventory games," Papers 2002.00953, arXiv.org.
    3. Luis A. Guardiola & Ana Meca & Justo Puerto, 2021. "Unitary Owen Points in Cooperative Lot-Sizing Models with Backlogging," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Luis A. Guardiola & Ana Meca & Justo Puerto, 2022. "The effect of consolidated periods in heterogeneous lot-sizing games," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(2), pages 380-404, July.
    5. Uhan, Nelson A., 2015. "Stochastic linear programming games with concave preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 637-646.
    6. Luis A. Guardiola & Ana Meca & Justo Puerto, 2021. "Enforcing fair cooperation in production-inventory settings with heterogeneous agents," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 59-80, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Beek, Andries & Malmberg, Benjamin & Borm, Peter & Quant, Marieke & Schouten, Jop, 2021. "Cooperation and Competition in Linear Production and Sequencing Processes," Discussion Paper 2021-011, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Luis A. Guardiola & Ana Meca & Justo Puerto, 2022. "The effect of consolidated periods in heterogeneous lot-sizing games," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(2), pages 380-404, July.
    3. Algaba, Encarnación & Béal, Sylvain & Fragnelli, Vito & Llorca, Natividad & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquin, 2019. "Relationship between labeled network games and other cooperative games arising from attributes situations," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    4. Elisabeth Gutierrez & Natividad Llorca & Manuel Mosquera & Joaquin Sanchez-Soriano, 2019. "On horizontal cooperation in linear production processes with a supplier that controls a limited resource," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 90(2), pages 169-196, October.
    5. Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers & Ruud Hendrickx, 2001. "Operations research games: A survey," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 9(2), pages 139-199, December.
    6. Bjørndal, Endre & Jörnsten, Kurt, 2009. "Lower and upper bounds for linear production games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 476-486, July.
    7. Tijs, S.H. & Timmer, J.B. & Llorca, N. & Sánchez-Soriano, J., 2000. "The Owen Set and the Core of Semi-Infinite Linear Production Situations," Discussion Paper 2000-49, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    8. Vito Fragnelli & Gianfranco Gambarelli, 2014. "Further open problems in cooperative games," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 24(4), pages 51-62.
    9. Borrero, D.V. & Hinojosa, M.A. & Mármol, A.M., 2016. "DEA production games and Owen allocations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 921-930.
    10. Lozano, S., 2013. "DEA production games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 405-413.
    11. Stefan Wintein & Peter Borm & Ruud Hendrickx & Marieke Quant, 2006. "Multiple Fund Investment Situations and Related Games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 63(3), pages 413-426, July.
    12. Kouladoum, Jean-Claude, 2019. "Décision du mariage des ménages tchadiens et Caractéristiques socio-économiques [Marriage decision of Chadian households and socio-economic characteristics]," MPRA Paper 91590, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Ichiro Nishizaki & Tomohiro Hayashida & Yuki Shintomi, 2016. "A core-allocation for a network restricted linear production game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 389-410, March.
    14. Kidd, Martin P. & Borm, Peter, 2021. "On Determining Leading Coalitions in Supply Chains: Methodology and Application," Discussion Paper 2021-009, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Roberto Roson & Franz Hubert, 2015. "Bargaining Power and Value Sharing in Distribution Networks: A Cooperative Game Theory Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 71-87, March.
    16. Sanchez-Soriano, Joaquin & Llorca, Natividad & Tijs, Stef & Timmer, Judith, 2002. "On the core of semi-infinite transportation games with divisible goods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(3), pages 463-475, November.
    17. van den Brink, René & González-Arangüena, Enrique & Manuel, Conrado & del Pozo, Mónica, 2014. "Order monotonic solutions for generalized characteristic functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(3), pages 786-796.
    18. Aguilera, Néstor E. & Di Marco, Silvia C. & Escalante, Mariana S., 2010. "The Shapley value for arbitrary families of coalitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 125-138, July.
    19. Meertens, M.A., 2005. "On balancedness of superadditive games and price equilibria in exchange economies," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 43-49, January.
    20. Giulia Bernardi & Roberto Lucchetti, 2015. "Generating Semivalues via Unanimity Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 1051-1062, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:220:y:2012:i:1:p:125-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.