IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v194y2009i1p39-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exact [epsilon]-constraint method for bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems: Application to the Traveling Salesman Problem with Profits

Author

Listed:
  • Bérubé, Jean-François
  • Gendreau, Michel
  • Potvin, Jean-Yves

Abstract

This paper describes an exact [epsilon]-constraint method for bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems with integer objective values. This method tackles multi-objective optimization problems by solving a series of single objective subproblems, where all but one objectives are transformed into constraints. We show in this paper that the Pareto front of bi-objective problems can be efficiently generated with the [epsilon]-constraint method. Furthermore, we describe heuristics based on information gathered from previous subproblems that significantly speed up the method. This approach is used to find the exact Pareto front of the Traveling Salesman Problem with Profits, a variant of the Traveling Salesman Problem in which a profit or prize value is associated with each vertex. The goal here is to visit a subset of vertices while addressing two conflicting objectives: maximize the collected prize and minimize the travel costs. We report the first exact results for this problem on instances derived from classical Vehicle Routing and Traveling Salesman Problem instances with up to 150 vertices. Results on approximations of the Pareto front obtained from a variant of our exact algorithm are also reported.

Suggested Citation

  • Bérubé, Jean-François & Gendreau, Michel & Potvin, Jean-Yves, 2009. "An exact [epsilon]-constraint method for bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems: Application to the Traveling Salesman Problem with Profits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 39-50, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:194:y:2009:i:1:p:39-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(07)01210-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laumanns, Marco & Thiele, Lothar & Zitzler, Eckart, 2006. "An efficient, adaptive parameter variation scheme for metaheuristics based on the epsilon-constraint method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 932-942, March.
    2. Serpil Say{i}n & Panos Kouvelis, 2005. "The Multiobjective Discrete Optimization Problem: A Weighted Min-Max Two-Stage Optimization Approach and a Bicriteria Algorithm," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(10), pages 1572-1581, October.
    3. JosÉ Figueira & Salvatore Greco & Matthias Ehrogott, 2005. "Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-23081-8, December.
    4. Riera-Ledesma, Jorge & Salazar-Gonzalez, Juan Jose, 2005. "The biobjective travelling purchaser problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(3), pages 599-613, February.
    5. Ted Ralphs & Matthew Saltzman & Margaret Wiecek, 2006. "An improved algorithm for solving biobjective integer programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 43-70, October.
    6. Dominique Feillet & Pierre Dejax & Michel Gendreau, 2005. "Traveling Salesman Problems with Profits," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 188-205, May.
    7. Namorado Climaco, Joao Carlos & Queiros Vieira Martins, Ernesto, 1982. "A bicriterion shortest path algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 399-404, December.
    8. Eugene L. Lawler, 1972. "A Procedure for Computing the K Best Solutions to Discrete Optimization Problems and Its Application to the Shortest Path Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(7), pages 401-405, March.
    9. Panos Kouvelis & Serpil Sayın, 2006. "Algorithm robust for the bicriteria discrete optimization problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 71-85, October.
    10. Matteo Fischetti & Juan José Salazar González & Paolo Toth, 1998. "Solving the Orienteering Problem through Branch-and-Cut," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 133-148, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Bergman & Merve Bodur & Carlos Cardonha & Andre A. Cire, 2022. "Network Models for Multiobjective Discrete Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 990-1005, March.
    2. Kerstin Dächert & Kathrin Klamroth, 2015. "A linear bound on the number of scalarizations needed to solve discrete tricriteria optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 643-676, April.
    3. Angelo Aliano Filho & Antonio Carlos Moretti & Margarida Vaz Pato & Washington Alves Oliveira, 2021. "An exact scalarization method with multiple reference points for bi-objective integer linear optimization problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 35-69, January.
    4. Miranda, Pablo A. & Blazquez, Carola A. & Obreque, Carlos & Maturana-Ross, Javier & Gutierrez-Jarpa, Gabriel, 2018. "The bi-objective insular traveling salesman problem with maritime and ground transportation costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1014-1036.
    5. Kobeaga, Gorka & Rojas-Delgado, Jairo & Merino, María & Lozano, Jose A., 2024. "A revisited branch-and-cut algorithm for large-scale orienteering problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 44-68.
    6. Alexander Engau, 2017. "Proper Efficiency and Tradeoffs in Multiple Criteria and Stochastic Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 119-134, January.
    7. Hadi Charkhgard & Martin Savelsbergh & Masoud Talebian, 2018. "Nondominated Nash points: application of biobjective mixed integer programming," 4OR, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 151-171, June.
    8. Pablo A. Miranda-Gonzalez & Javier Maturana-Ross & Carola A. Blazquez & Guillermo Cabrera-Guerrero, 2021. "Exact Formulation and Analysis for the Bi-Objective Insular Traveling Salesman Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-33, October.
    9. Ioanna Makarouni & John Psarras & Eleftherios Siskos, 2015. "Interactive bicriterion decision support for a large scale industrial scheduling system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 227(1), pages 45-61, April.
    10. Jyrki Wallenius & James S. Dyer & Peter C. Fishburn & Ralph E. Steuer & Stanley Zionts & Kalyanmoy Deb, 2008. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(7), pages 1336-1349, July.
    11. Kirlik, Gokhan & Sayın, Serpil, 2014. "A new algorithm for generating all nondominated solutions of multiobjective discrete optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 479-488.
    12. Klamroth, Kathrin & Köbis, Elisabeth & Schöbel, Anita & Tammer, Christiane, 2017. "A unified approach to uncertain optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 403-420.
    13. Manerba, Daniele & Mansini, Renata & Riera-Ledesma, Jorge, 2017. "The Traveling Purchaser Problem and its variants," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 1-18.
    14. C. Gutiérrez & L. Huerga & E. Köbis & C. Tammer, 2021. "A scalarization scheme for binary relations with applications to set-valued and robust optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 233-256, January.
    15. Gunawan, Aldy & Lau, Hoong Chuin & Vansteenwegen, Pieter, 2016. "Orienteering Problem: A survey of recent variants, solution approaches and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 315-332.
    16. Stacey Faulkenberg & Margaret Wiecek, 2012. "Generating equidistant representations in biobjective programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1173-1210, April.
    17. Hartillo-Hermoso, María Isabel & Jiménez-Tafur, Haydee & Ucha-Enríquez, José María, 2020. "An exact algebraic ϵ-constraint method for bi-objective linear integer programming based on test sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 453-463.
    18. Jesús Sáez-Aguado & Paula Camelia Trandafir, 2018. "Variants of the $$ \varepsilon $$ ε -constraint method for biobjective integer programming problems: application to p-median-cover problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 87(2), pages 251-283, April.
    19. Mavrotas, George & Florios, Kostas, 2013. "An improved version of the augmented epsilon-constraint method (AUGMECON2) for finding the exact Pareto set in Multi-Objective Integer Programming problems," MPRA Paper 105034, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Belhoul, Lyes, 2014. "Résolution de problèmes d'optimisation combinatoire mono et multi-objectifs par énumération ordonnée," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/14672 edited by Vanderpooten, Daniel.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:194:y:2009:i:1:p:39-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.