IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v271y2018i2d10.1007_s10479-018-3066-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trains do not vanish: the ROADEF/EURO challenge 2014

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Artigues

    (Universit de Toulouse, CNRS)

  • Eric Bourreau

    (Université Montpellier, LIRMM)

  • Vincent Jost

    (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS)

  • Safia Kedad-Sidhoum

    (Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06)

  • François Ramond

    (SNCF Innovation & Research)

Abstract

The ROADEF/EURO challenge is a contest jointly organized by the French Operational Research and Decision Aid society (ROADEF) and the European Operational Research society (EURO). The contest has appeared on a regular basis since 1999 and always concerns an applied optimization problem proposed by an industrial partner. The 2014 edition of the ROADEF/EURO challenge was led by the Innovation & Research department of SNCF, a global leader in passenger and freight transport services, and infrastructure manager of the French railway network. The objective of the challenge was to find the best way to store and move trains on large railway sites, between their arrivals and departures. Since trains never vanish and traffic continues to increase, in recent years some stations have been having real congestion issues. Train management in large railway sites is of high interest for SNCF, which is why it was submitted to the operations research community as the industrial problem for the 2014 edition of the ROADEF/EURO challenge. This paper introduces the special section of the Annals of Operations Research volume devoted to the ROADEF/EURO challenge 2014, as well as the methods of the finalist teams and their results.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Artigues & Eric Bourreau & Vincent Jost & Safia Kedad-Sidhoum & François Ramond, 2018. "Trains do not vanish: the ROADEF/EURO challenge 2014," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1091-1105, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:271:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-018-3066-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-3066-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-018-3066-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-018-3066-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hugo Joudrier & Florence Thiard, 2018. "A greedy approach for a rolling stock management problem using multi-interval constraint propagation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1165-1183, December.
    2. Jean-François Cordeau & Paolo Toth & Daniele Vigo, 1998. "A Survey of Optimization Models for Train Routing and Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 380-404, November.
    3. Richard Freling & Ramon M. Lentink & Leo G. Kroon & Dennis Huisman, 2005. "Shunting of Passenger Train Units in a Railway Station," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 261-272, May.
    4. Mirsad Buljubašić & Michel Vasquez & Haris Gavranović, 2018. "Two-phase heuristic for SNCF rolling stock problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1107-1129, December.
    5. Martin Josef Geiger & Sandra Huber & Sebastian Langton & Marius Leschik & Christian Lindorf & Ulrich Tüshaus, 2018. "Multi-attribute assignment of trains to departures in rolling stock management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1131-1163, December.
    6. Leo G. Kroon & Ramon M. Lentink & Alexander Schrijver, 2008. "Shunting of Passenger Train Units: An Integrated Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 436-449, November.
    7. Dennis Huisman & Leo G. Kroon & Ramon M. Lentink & Michiel J. C. M. Vromans, 2005. "Operations Research in passenger railway transportation," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 59(4), pages 467-497, November.
    8. Freling, R. & Lentink, R.M. & Kroon, L.G. & Huisman, D., 2002. "Shunting of Passenger Train Units in a Railway Station," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-74-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean André & Eric Bourreau & Roberto Wolfler Calvo, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Section: ROADEF/EURO Challenge 2016—Inventory Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 299-301, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    2. Kroon, L.G. & Lentink, R.M. & Schrijver, A., 2006. "Shunting of Passenger Train Units: an Integrated Approach," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-068-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Leo G. Kroon & Ramon M. Lentink & Alexander Schrijver, 2008. "Shunting of Passenger Train Units: An Integrated Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 436-449, November.
    4. Martin Josef Geiger & Sandra Huber & Sebastian Langton & Marius Leschik & Christian Lindorf & Ulrich Tüshaus, 2018. "Multi-attribute assignment of trains to departures in rolling stock management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1131-1163, December.
    5. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Jaehn, Florian & Pesch, Erwin, 2012. "Shunting yard operations: Theoretical aspects and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 1-14.
    6. Haahr, J.T. & Lusby, R.M. & Wagenaar, J.C., 2015. "A Comparison of Optimization Methods for Solving the Depot Matching and Parking Problem," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2015-013-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Mirsad Buljubašić & Michel Vasquez & Haris Gavranović, 2018. "Two-phase heuristic for SNCF rolling stock problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1107-1129, December.
    8. Budai-Balke, G. & Maróti, G. & Dekker, R. & Huisman, D. & Kroon, L.G., 2007. "Re-scheduling in railways: the rolling stock balancing problem," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-21, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    9. Li Lei & Raymond S K Kwan & Zhiyuan Lin & Pedro J Copado-Mendez, 2022. "Resolution of coupling order and station level constraints in train unit scheduling," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 27-61, March.
    10. Nils Boysen & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2011. "Scheduling Freight Trains in Rail-Rail Transshipment Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 199-211, May.
    11. Gianmarco Garrisi & Cristina Cervelló-Pastor, 2019. "Train-Scheduling Optimization Model for Railway Networks with Multiplatform Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Lin, Zhiyuan & Kwan, Raymond S.K., 2016. "A branch-and-price approach for solving the train unit scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 97-120.
    13. David Schindl & Nicolas Zufferey, 2015. "A learning tabu search for a truck allocation problem with linear and nonlinear cost components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(1), pages 32-45, February.
    14. Cacchiani, Valentina & Furini, Fabio & Kidd, Martin Philip, 2016. "Approaches to a real-world Train Timetabling Problem in a railway node," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 97-110.
    15. Benjamin Otto, 2019. "Aggregation techniques for frequency assignment in public transportation," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 51-87, June.
    16. Juraj Čamaj & Eva Brumerčíková & Michal Petr Hranický, 2020. "Information System and Technology Optimization as a Tool for Ensuring the Competitiveness of a Railway Undertaking—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Nielsen, Lars Kjær & Kroon, Leo & Maróti, Gábor, 2012. "A rolling horizon approach for disruption management of railway rolling stock," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 496-509.
    18. Valentina Cacchiani & Alberto Caprara & Paolo Toth, 2019. "An Effective Peak Period Heuristic for Railway Rolling Stock Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 746-762, May.
    19. Haahr, Jørgen & Lusby, Richard M., 2017. "Integrating rolling stock scheduling with train unit shunting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 452-468.
    20. Haahr, Jørgen Thorlund & Lusby, Richard M. & Wagenaar, Joris Camiel, 2017. "Optimization methods for the Train Unit Shunting Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 981-995.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:271:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-018-3066-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.