IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v212y2014i1p79-9110.1007-s10479-013-1315-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survival of systems with protection subject to two types of external attacks

Author

Listed:
  • Ji Cha
  • Maxim Finkelstein
  • Francois Marais

Abstract

We consider a large system that, due to its importance and (or) large economic value, should be protected from possible harmful attacks. The attacker executes two types of attacks modeled by the corresponding shock processes: those that target the repairable defense system and those that target the non-repairable ‘main’ system itself. The quality of the performance of the defense system, i.e., the ability to neutralize the attacks on the main system depends on its state defined by the accumulated damage. In order to obtain the survival probabilities for the main system, we develop a new class of state-dependent extreme shock models, where the accumulated damage caused by the shock process of one type affects the probability of failure from shocks of the other type. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Ji Cha & Maxim Finkelstein & Francois Marais, 2014. "Survival of systems with protection subject to two types of external attacks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 79-91, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:212:y:2014:i:1:p:79-91:10.1007/s10479-013-1315-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-013-1315-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-013-1315-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-013-1315-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Finkelstein, Maxim & Marais, Francois, 2010. "On terminating Poisson processes in some shock models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 874-879.
    2. Gut, Allan & Hüsler, Jürg, 2005. "Realistic variation of shock models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 187-204, September.
    3. Chen, Jinyuan & Li, Zehui, 2008. "An extended extreme shock maintenance model for a deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(8), pages 1123-1129.
    4. Austin J. Lemoine & Michael L. Wenocur, 1986. "Technical Note—A Note on Shot-Noise and Reliability Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 320-323, April.
    5. Montoro-Cazorla, Delia & Pérez-Ocón, Rafael & del Carmen Segovia, Maria, 2009. "Replacement policy in a system under shocks following a Markovian arrival process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 497-502.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2016. "On some properties of shock processes in a ‘natural’ scale," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 104-110.
    2. Finkelstein, Maxim & Marais, Francois, 2010. "On terminating Poisson processes in some shock models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 874-879.
    3. Rodríguez, Joanna & Lillo, Rosa E. & Ramírez-Cobo, Pepa, 2015. "Failure modeling of an electrical N-component framework by the non-stationary Markovian arrival process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 126-133.
    4. Gregory Levitin & Maxim Finkelstein, 2017. "A new stress–strength model for systems subject to stochastic shocks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(2), pages 172-179, April.
    5. Maxim Finkelstein & Gregory Levitin, 2018. "Optimal mission duration for systems subject to shocks and internal failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(1), pages 82-91, February.
    6. Delia Montoro-Cazorla & Rafael Pérez-Ocón, 2022. "Analysis of k-Out-of-N-Systems with Different Units under Simultaneous Failures: A Matrix-Analytic Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Zhao, Xufeng & Qian, Cunhua & Nakagawa, Toshio, 2013. "Optimal policies for cumulative damage models with maintenance last and first," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 50-59.
    8. Maxim Finkelstein & Gregory Levitin, 2020. "On missions’ quality of performance for systems with partially or completely observable degradation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(5), pages 676-685, October.
    9. Eryilmaz, Serkan, 2015. "Assessment of a multi-state system under a shock model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 1-8.
    10. Maxim Finkelstein & Gregory Levitin, 2018. "Optimal Mission Duration for Partially Repairable Systems Operating in a Random Environment," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 505-516, June.
    11. Xufeng Zhao & Toshio Nakagawa, 2016. "Over-time and over-level replacement policies with random working cycles," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(1), pages 103-116, September.
    12. Montoro-Cazorla, Delia & Pérez-Ocón, Rafael, 2014. "A redundant n-system under shocks and repairs following Markovian arrival processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 69-75.
    13. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2020. "Mission abort policy optimization for series systems with overlapping primary and rescue subsystems operating in a random environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    15. Dheeraj Goyal & Nil Kamal Hazra & Maxim Finkelstein, 2022. "On Properties of the Phase-type Mixed Poisson Process and its Applications to Reliability Shock Modeling," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2933-2960, December.
    16. Montoro-Cazorla, Delia & Pérez-Ocón, Rafael, 2018. "Constructing a Markov process for modelling a reliability system under multiple failures and replacements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 34-47.
    17. Lina Bian & Bo Peng & Yong Ye, 2023. "Reliability Analysis and Optimal Replacement Policy for Systems with Generalized Pólya Censored δ Shock Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2020. "On optimal life extension for degrading systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 487-495, June.
    19. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2018. "Optimal mission abort policy for systems in a random environment with variable shock rate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 11-17.
    20. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2018. "Mission abort policy balancing the uncompleted mission penalty and system loss risk," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 194-201.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:212:y:2014:i:1:p:79-91:10.1007/s10479-013-1315-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.