IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v209y2013i1p255-27710.1007-s10479-012-1145-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality risk prediction at a non-sampling station machine in a multi-product, multi-stage, parallel processing manufacturing system subjected to sequence disorder and multiple stream effects

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Rotondo
  • Paul Young
  • John Geraghty

Abstract

Quality risks determined by inspection economies represent a difficult controllable variable in complex manufacturing environments. Planning a quality strategy without being able to predict its effectiveness in all the stations of a system might eventually lead to a loss of time, money and resources. The use of one station to regularly select the samples for a production segment introduces relevant complexities in the analysis of the available quality measurements when they are referred to the other stations in that segment. The multiple streams of product through the parallel machines of the stations and the cycle time randomness, responsible for variation of the item sequence order at each production step, nullify the regularity of the sampling patterns at the machines of the non-sampling stations. This work develops a fundamental model which supports the prediction of the ‘quality risk’, at a given machine in the non-sampling stations, associated with a particular sampling policy for a multi-product, multi-stage, parallel processing manufacturing system subjected to sequence disorder and multiple stream effects. The rationale on which the model is based and successful applications of the model, to scenarios structurally different from those used for its development, give confidence in the general validity of the model here proposed for the quality risk prediction at non-sampling station machines. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Rotondo & Paul Young & John Geraghty, 2013. "Quality risk prediction at a non-sampling station machine in a multi-product, multi-stage, parallel processing manufacturing system subjected to sequence disorder and multiple stream effects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 255-277, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:209:y:2013:i:1:p:255-277:10.1007/s10479-012-1145-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1145-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-012-1145-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-012-1145-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murat Kaya & Özalp Özer, 2009. "Quality risk in outsourcing: Noncontractible product quality and private quality cost information," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(7), pages 669-685, October.
    2. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Jamal, A.M.M. & Mondal, Sanjay, 2008. "Optimal batch sizing in a multi-stage production system with rework consideration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 915-929, February.
    3. Henry A. Young, 1963. "On the Optimum Location of Checking Stations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 721-731, October.
    4. Colledani, Marcello & Tolio, Tullio, 2009. "Performance evaluation of production systems monitored by statistical process control and off-line inspections," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 348-367, August.
    5. Chakraborty, Tulika & Giri, B.C. & Chaudhuri, K.S., 2008. "Production lot sizing with process deterioration and machine breakdown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 606-618, March.
    6. Michal Penn & Tal Raviv, 2007. "Optimizing the quality control station configuration," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 301-314, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zengyuan Wu & Caihong Zhou & Fei Xu & Wengao Lou, 2022. "A CS-AdaBoost-BP model for product quality inspection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 685-701, January.
    2. Zhenyu Liu & Donghao Zhang & Weiqiang Jia & Xianke Lin & Hui Liu, 2020. "An adversarial bidirectional serial–parallel LSTM-based QTD framework for product quality prediction," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1511-1529, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al-Salamah, Muhammad, 2019. "Economic production quantity in an imperfect manufacturing process with synchronous and asynchronous flexible rework rates," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    2. Anna Nagurney & Dong Li, 2015. "A supply chain network game theory model with product differentiation, outsourcing of production and distribution, and quality and price competition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 479-503, March.
    3. Prasenjit Mandal & Tarun Jain & Abhishek Chakraborty, 2021. "Quality collaboration contracts under product pricing strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(1), pages 231-264, July.
    4. Om Prakash & A.R. Roy & A. Goswami, 2014. "Stochastic manufacturing system with process deterioration and machine breakdown," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(12), pages 2539-2551, December.
    5. Karimi-Mamaghan, Maryam & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Jula, Payman & Pirayesh, Amir & Ahmadi, Hadi, 2020. "A learning-based metaheuristic for a multi-objective agile inspection planning model under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 513-537.
    6. Peymankar, Mahboobe & Dehghanian, Farzad & Ghiami, Yousef & Abolbashari, Mohammad Hassan, 2018. "The effects of contractual agreements on the economic production quantity model with machine breakdown," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 203-215.
    7. Mitali Sarkar & Li Pan & Bikash Koli Dey & Biswajit Sarkar, 2020. "Does the Autonomation Policy Really Help in a Smart Production System for Controlling Defective Production?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Xinjian Wu & Chao Yu & Suyong Zhang, 2022. "Quality level and outsourcing strategies in a three-tier low-carbon supply chain [Delegation vs. control in low-carbon supply chain procurement under competition]," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 17, pages 980-990.
    9. Yoo, Seung Ho & Cheong, Taesu, 2018. "Quality improvement incentive strategies in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 331-342.
    10. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yao, Dong-qing, 2019. "Factory encroachment and channel selection in an outsourced supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 73-83.
    11. Roubos, Alex & Jouini, Oualid, 2013. "Call centers with hyperexponential patience modeling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 307-315.
    12. Wang, Xuan & Ng, Chi To & Dong, Ciwei, 2020. "Implications of peer-to-peer product sharing when the selling firm joins the sharing market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 138-151.
    13. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Diponegoro, Ahmad, 2009. "Optimal production plans and shipment schedules in a supply-chain system with multiple suppliers and multiple buyers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(3), pages 753-773, May.
    14. Harun Öztürk, 2021. "Optimal production run time for an imperfect production inventory system with rework, random breakdowns and inspection costs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 167-204, March.
    15. Ping-Chen Chang, 2019. "Reliability estimation for a stochastic production system with finite buffer storage by a simulation approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(1), pages 119-133, June.
    16. Rung-Hung Su & Ming-Wei Weng & Yung-Fu Huang, 2020. "Innovative maintenance problem in a two-stage production-inventory system with imperfect processes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 379-401, April.
    17. Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2009. "On optimal batch sizing in a multi-stage production system with rework consideration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 1238-1244, August.
    18. K.Y. Kung & Y.D. Huang & H.M. Wee & Y. Daryanto, 2019. "Production-Inventory System for Deteriorating Items with Machine Breakdown, Inspection, and Partial Backordering," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-26, July.
    19. Chang Wook Kang & Misbah Ullah & Mitali Sarkar & Muhammad Omair & Biswajit Sarkar, 2019. "A Single-Stage Manufacturing Model with Imperfect Items, Inspections, Rework, and Planned Backorders," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Zengyuan Wu & Caihong Zhou & Fei Xu & Wengao Lou, 2022. "A CS-AdaBoost-BP model for product quality inspection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 685-701, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:209:y:2013:i:1:p:255-277:10.1007/s10479-012-1145-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.