IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v182y2011i1p213-23310.1007-s10479-010-0722-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximate performance analysis of CONWIP disciplines in unreliable non homogeneous transfer lines

Author

Listed:
  • Fatima Mhada
  • Roland Malhamé

Abstract

For a given choice of the maximum allowable total storage parameter, the performance of constant work-in-process (CONWIP) disciplines in unreliable transfer lines subjected to a constant rate of demand for parts, is characterized via a tractable approximate mathematical model. For a (n−1) machines CONWIP loop, the model consists of n multi-state machine single buffer building blocks, separately solvable once a total of (n−1) 2 unknown constants shared by the building blocks are initialized. The multi-state machine is common to all building blocks, and its n discrete states approximate the joint operating state of the machines within the CONWIP loop; each of the first (n−1) blocks maps into a single internal buffer dynamics, while the nth building block characterizes total work-in-process (wip) dynamics. The blocks correspond to linear n component state equations with boundary conditions. The unknown (shared) constants in the block dynamics are initialized and calculated by means of successive iterations. The performance estimates of interest—mean total wip, and probability of parts availability at the end buffer in the loop—are obtained from the model and validated against the results of Monte Carlo simulations. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Fatima Mhada & Roland Malhamé, 2011. "Approximate performance analysis of CONWIP disciplines in unreliable non homogeneous transfer lines," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 213-233, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:182:y:2011:i:1:p:213-233:10.1007/s10479-010-0722-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-010-0722-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-010-0722-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-010-0722-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Javad Sadr & Roland Malhamé, 2004. "Unreliable Transfer Lines: Decomposition/Aggregation and Optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 167-190, January.
    2. Stanley B. Gershwin, 1987. "An Efficient Decomposition Method for the Approximate Evaluation of Tandem Queues with Finite Storage Space and Blocking," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 291-305, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alain Patchong & Thierry Lemoine & Gilles Kern, 2003. "Improving Car Body Production at PSA Peugeot Citroën," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 36-49, February.
    2. Eva K. Lee & Siddhartha Maheshwary & Jacquelyn Mason & William Glisson, 2006. "Large-Scale Dispensing for Emergency Response to Bioterrorism and Infectious-Disease Outbreak," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 591-607, December.
    3. Konstantinos S. Boulas & Georgios D. Dounias & Chrissoleon T. Papadopoulos, 2023. "A hybrid evolutionary algorithm approach for estimating the throughput of short reliable approximately balanced production lines," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 823-852, February.
    4. Ünsal Özdoğru & Tayfur Altiok, 2015. "Continuous material flow systems: analysis of marine ports handling bulk materials," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 231(1), pages 79-104, August.
    5. Papadopoulos, H. T. & Heavey, C., 1996. "Queueing theory in manufacturing systems analysis and design: A classification of models for production and transfer lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Andrea Matta & Francesca Simone, 2016. "Analysis of two-machine lines with finite buffer, operation-dependent and time-dependent failure modes," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(6), pages 1850-1862, March.
    7. Saied Samiedaluie & Vedat Verter, 2019. "The impact of specialization of hospitals on patient access to care; a queuing analysis with an application to a neurological hospital," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 709-726, December.
    8. Colledani, Marcello & Tolio, Tullio, 2009. "Performance evaluation of production systems monitored by statistical process control and off-line inspections," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 348-367, August.
    9. Belmansour, Ahmed-Tidjani & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2010. "An aggregation method for performance evaluation of a tandem homogenous production line with machines having multiple failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1193-1201.
    10. Ziwei Lin & Nicla Frigerio & Andrea Matta & Shichang Du, 2021. "Multi-fidelity surrogate-based optimization for decomposed buffer allocation problems," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 223-253, March.
    11. Bengisu Urlu & Nesim K. Erkip, 2020. "Safety stock placement for serial systems under supply process uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 395-424, June.
    12. Osorio, Carolina & Wang, Carter, 2017. "On the analytical approximation of joint aggregate queue-length distributions for traffic networks: A stationary finite capacity Markovian network approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 305-339.
    13. Upset Robert & P.Van Til Robert & Sengupta Sankar, 1998. "Development of a model for a two-station serial transfer line subject to machine and buffer failure," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 231-246, January.
    14. Mehmet Ulaş Koyuncuoğlu & Leyla Demir, 2021. "A comparison of combat genetic and big bang–big crunch algorithms for solving the buffer allocation problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1529-1546, August.
    15. Elisa Gebennini & Andrea Grassi & Cesare Fantuzzi & Stanley Gershwin & Irvin Schick, 2013. "Discrete time model for two-machine one-buffer transfer lines with restart policy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 41-65, October.
    16. Meller, Russell D. & Kim, David S., 1996. "The impact of preventive maintenance on system cost and buffer size," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 577-591, December.
    17. Suliman, S. M. A., 2000. "A mathematical model for a buffered two-stage manufacturing cell with an unreliable transfer device," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 69-81, January.
    18. Jeffrey M. Alden & Lawrence D. Burns & Theodore Costy & Richard D. Hutton & Craig A. Jackson & David S. Kim & Kevin A. Kohls & Jonathan H. Owen & Mark A. Turnquist & David J. Vander Veen, 2006. "General Motors Increases Its Production Throughput," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 6-25, February.
    19. Noa Zychlinski & Avishai Mandelbaum & Petar Momčilović & Izack Cohen, 2020. "Bed Blocking in Hospitals Due to Scarce Capacity in Geriatric Institutions—Cost Minimization via Fluid Models," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 396-411, March.
    20. Kolb, Oliver & Göttlich, Simone, 2015. "A continuous buffer allocation model using stochastic processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 865-874.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:182:y:2011:i:1:p:213-233:10.1007/s10479-010-0722-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.