IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v165y2009i1p97-12110.1007-s10479-007-0306-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moment based approaches to value the risk of contingent claim portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Gaetano Iaquinta
  • Fabio Lamantia
  • Ivar Massabò
  • Sergio Ortobelli

Abstract

In this paper we describe and apply the estimating function methodology to value the risk of asset derivative portfolios. We first implement the Li’s model based on the first four moments and then we show the limits of this model in forecasting the maximum loss of contingent claims. In addition, we show that four moments are not enough to describe the behavior of the lower percentiles of derivatives. Finally, we propose a model that considers the first six moments and we compare the performances of these models proposing a backtest analysis on several historical and truncated asset derivative portfolios. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Suggested Citation

  • Gaetano Iaquinta & Fabio Lamantia & Ivar Massabò & Sergio Ortobelli, 2009. "Moment based approaches to value the risk of contingent claim portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 97-121, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:165:y:2009:i:1:p:97-121:10.1007/s10479-007-0306-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-007-0306-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-007-0306-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-007-0306-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoffersen, Peter F, 1998. "Evaluating Interval Forecasts," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 39(4), pages 841-862, November.
    2. Paul H. Kupiec, 1995. "Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 95-24, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    3. Li, David X & Turtle, H J, 2000. "Semiparametric ARCH Models: An Estimating Function Approach," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 18(2), pages 174-186, April.
    4. Crowder, Martin, 1986. "On Consistency and Inconsistency of Estimating Equations," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 305-330, December.
    5. Benoit Mandelbrot, 1963. "New Methods in Statistical Economics," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 71(5), pages 421-421.
    6. Benoit Mandelbrot, 2015. "The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Anastasios G Malliaris & William T Ziemba (ed.), THE WORLD SCIENTIFIC HANDBOOK OF FUTURES MARKETS, chapter 3, pages 39-78, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Vinel & Pavlo A. Krokhmal, 2017. "Certainty equivalent measures of risk," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 75-95, February.
    2. Stoyan Stoyanov & Svetlozar Rachev & Frank Fabozzi, 2013. "Sensitivity of portfolio VaR and CVaR to portfolio return characteristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 205(1), pages 169-187, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anand, Abhinav & Li, Tiantian & Kurosaki, Tetsuo & Kim, Young Shin, 2016. "Foster–Hart optimal portfolios," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 117-130.
    2. Ortobelli, Sergio & Rachev, Svetlozar T. & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2010. "Risk management and dynamic portfolio selection with stable Paretian distributions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 195-211, March.
    3. Abhinav Anand & Tiantian Li & Tetsuo Kurosaki & Young Shin Kim, 2017. "The equity risk posed by the too-big-to-fail banks: a Foster–Hart estimation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 21-41, June.
    4. Marco Rocco, 2011. "Extreme value theory for finance: a survey," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 99, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    5. Gonzalo Cortazar & Alejandro Bernales & Diether Beuermann, 2005. "Methodology and Implementation of Value-at-Risk Measures in Emerging Fixed-Income Markets with Infrequent Trading," Finance 0512030, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Carol Alexander & Emese Lazar & Silvia Stanescu, 2011. "Analytic Approximations to GARCH Aggregated Returns Distributions with Applications to VaR and ETL," ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance icma-dp2011-08, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    7. Stavroyiannis, S. & Makris, I. & Nikolaidis, V. & Zarangas, L., 2012. "Econometric modeling and value-at-risk using the Pearson type-IV distribution," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 10-17.
    8. Sabrina Khanniche, 2009. "Evaluation of Hedge Fund Returns Value at Risk Using GARCH Models," EconomiX Working Papers 2009-46, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    9. LeBaron, Blake, 2003. "Non-Linear Time Series Models in Empirical Finance,: Philip Hans Franses and Dick van Dijk, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, 296 pp., Paperback, ISBN 0-521-77965-0, $33, [UK pound]22.95, [," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 751-752.
    10. Franses,Philip Hans & Dijk,Dick van, 2000. "Non-Linear Time Series Models in Empirical Finance," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521779654, September.
    11. López-Martín, Carmen & Arguedas-Sanz, Raquel & Muela, Sonia Benito, 2022. "A cryptocurrency empirical study focused on evaluating their distribution functions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 387-407.
    12. Stéphane Goutte & David Guerreiro & Bilel Sanhaji & Sophie Saglio & Julien Chevallier, 2019. "International Financial Markets," Post-Print halshs-02183053, HAL.
    13. Chiu, Yen-Chen & Chuang, I-Yuan, 2016. "The performance of the switching forecast model of value-at-risk in the Asian stock markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 43-51.
    14. Iseringhausen, Martin, 2020. "The time-varying asymmetry of exchange rate returns: A stochastic volatility – stochastic skewness model," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 275-292.
    15. Kwangmin Jung & Donggyu Kim & Seunghyeon Yu, 2022. "Next generation models for portfolio risk management: An approach using financial big data," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(3), pages 765-787, September.
    16. Felipe de Oliveira & Sinézio Fernandes Maia, 2017. "Volatility Forecasting before the Subprime Crisis," EcoMod2017 10376, EcoMod.
    17. Jung-Bin Su, 2014. "How to mitigate the impact of inappropriate distributional settings when the parametric value-at-risk approach is used," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 305-325, February.
    18. Erik Kole & Thijs Markwat & Anne Opschoor & Dick van Dijk, 2017. "Forecasting Value-at-Risk under Temporal and Portfolio Aggregation," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 649-677.
    19. Chebbi, Ali & Hedhli, Amel, 2022. "Revisiting the accuracy of standard VaR methods for risk assessment: Using the Copula–EVT multidimensional approach for stock markets in the MENA region," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 430-445.
    20. repec:agr:journl:v:4(621):y:2019:i:4(621):p:201-218 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Chiu, Yen-Chen & Chuang, I-Yuan & Lai, Jing-Yi, 2010. "The performance of composite forecast models of value-at-risk in the energy market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 423-431, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:165:y:2009:i:1:p:97-121:10.1007/s10479-007-0306-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.