IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/amsrev/v14y2024i1d10.1007_s13162-024-00276-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market research ethics: New practices but no new ideas

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Cluley

    (University of Birmingham)

  • William Green

    (University of Birmingham)

Abstract

The ethical issues involved with marketing research are receiving increased public scrutiny, prompting calls for marketing scholars and research practitioners to revisit the issue. To support researchers and practitioners, this paper provides a systematic scoping review of research on the ethics of market research developed across a range of literatures (N = 134). It demonstrates that, over 70 years, marketing scholars have explored the ethics of market research from normative, descriptive, theoretical and technical approaches. But, while marketing scholars were once at the forefront of theorising the ethics of marketing research, the field is increasingly fragmented and specialized. The result is that, following a series of theoretical innovations in the 1980s, progress has all but ended. We ask why marketing scholars have turned away from the ethics of marketing research given the importance of the topic in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Cluley & William Green, 2024. "Market research ethics: New practices but no new ideas," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 14(1), pages 68-82, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13162-024-00276-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s13162-024-00276-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13162-024-00276-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13162-024-00276-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terry R. Adler & Thomas G. Pittz & Hank B. Strevel & Dina Denney & Susan D. Steiner & Elizabeth S. Adler, 2022. "Team Over-Empowerment in Market Research: A Virtue-Based Ethics Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 159-173, February.
    2. Székely, Francisco & Knirsch, Marianna, 2005. "Responsible Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility:: Metrics for Sustainable Performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 628-647, December.
    3. Praveen Aggarwal & Rajiv Vaidyanathan & Stephen Castleberry, 2012. "Managerial and Public Attitudes Toward Ethics in Marketing Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(4), pages 463-481, September.
    4. Domenico, Giandomenico Di & Sit, Jason & Ishizaka, Alessio & Nunan, Daniel, 2021. "Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 329-341.
    5. Teck Ming Tan & Jari Salo, 2023. "Ethical Marketing in the Blockchain-Based Sharing Economy: Theoretical Integration and Guiding Insights," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 1113-1140, April.
    6. Heiko Wieland & Angeline Nariswari & Melissa Archpru Akaka, 2021. "On managerial relevance: reconciling the academic-practitioner divide through market theorizing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 252-271, December.
    7. Mathieu Alemany Oliver & Jean-Sébastien Vayre, 2015. "Big data and the future of knowledge production in marketing research: Ethics, digital traces, and abductive reasoning," Post-Print hal-03289835, HAL.
    8. O. C. Ferrell & Victoria L. Crittenden & Linda Ferrell & William F. Crittenden, 2013. "Theoretical development in ethical marketing decision making," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 3(2), pages 51-60, June.
    9. Shelby D. Hunt, 2013. "The inductive realist model of theory generation: explaining the development of a theory of marketing ethics," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 3(2), pages 61-73, June.
    10. Wenbin Sun & Rahul Govind, 2022. "A New Understanding of Marketing and “Doing Good”: Marketing’s Power in the TMT and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 89-109, February.
    11. Skinner, Steven J. & Dubinsky, Alan J. & Ferrell, O. C., 1988. "Organizational dimensions of marketing-research ethics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 209-223, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gajendra Liyanaarachchi & Giampaolo Viglia & Fidan Kurtaliqi, 2024. "Addressing challenges of digital transformation with modified blockchain," Post-Print hal-04440365, HAL.
    2. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    3. Zeinab Shahbazi & Yung-Cheol Byun, 2022. "NLP-Based Digital Forensic Analysis for Online Social Network Based on System Security," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Xia, Huosong & Wang, Yuan & Zhang, Justin Zuopeng & Zheng, Leven J. & Kamal, Muhammad Mustafa & Arya, Varsha, 2023. "COVID-19 fake news detection: A hybrid CNN-BiLSTM-AM model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Muhammad Zahid & Haseeb Ur Rahman & Musa Khan & Wajahat Ali & Fazaila Shad, 2020. "Addressing endogeneity by proposing novel instrumental variables in the nexus of sustainability reporting and firm financial performance: A step‐by‐step procedure for non‐experts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3086-3103, December.
    6. Hazal Koray Alay & Abdulkadir Keskin & Meri Taksi Deveciyan & Gülaçtı Şen & Didem Kayalıdereden & Şayan Berber, 2024. "The Impact of Green Business Ethics and Green Financing on Sustainable Business Performance of Industries in Türkiye: The Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Shelby Hunt, 2015. "Explicating the inductive realist model of theory generation," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(1), pages 20-27, June.
    8. Yanica P. Dimitrova, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation – the Meaningful Connection," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 89-108.
    9. Shelby D. Hunt, 2017. "Strategic marketing, sustainability, the triple bottom line, and resource-advantage (R-A) theory: Securing the foundations of strategic marketing theory and research," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 52-66, June.
    10. Angel Sevil & Alfonso Cruz & Tomas Reyes & Roberto Vassolo, 2022. "When Being Large Is Not an Advantage: How Innovation Impacts the Sustainability of Firm Performance in Natural Resource Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Tze San Ong & Boon Heng Teh & Ah Suat Lee, 2019. "Contingent Factors and Sustainable Performance Measurement (SPM) Practices of Malaysian Electronics and Electrical Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-33, February.
    12. Abdullah Marish Ali & Fuad A. Ghaleb & Mohammed Sultan Mohammed & Fawaz Jaber Alsolami & Asif Irshad Khan, 2023. "Web-Informed-Augmented Fake News Detection Model Using Stacked Layers of Convolutional Neural Network and Deep Autoencoder," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Jan Trzaskowski, 2022. "Data-driven value extraction and human well-being under EU law," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 447-458, June.
    14. Camélia Radu & Nadia Smaili, 2021. "Corporate performance patterns of Canadian listed firms: Balancing financial and corporate social responsibility outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3344-3359, November.
    15. Ming‐Lang Tseng & Ming K. Lim & Kuo‐Jui Wu, 2018. "Corporate sustainability performance improvement using an interrelationship hierarchical model approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1334-1346, December.
    16. Mert Bilgin, 2009. "The PEARL Model: Gaining Competitive Advantage Through Sustainable Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 545-554, April.
    17. Ahmad Ibrahim Aljumah, 2023. "Investigating the Impact of Blockchain Technology on Social Sustainability and the Mediating Role of Ethics and CSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Dorel Mihai Paraschiv & Estera Laura Nemoianu & Claudia Adriana Langă & Tünde Szabó, 2012. "Eco-innovation, Responsible Leadership and Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(32), pages 404-419, June.
    19. Ekaterina Blinova & Tatyana Ponomarenko & Valentin Knysh, 2022. "Analyzing the Concept of Corporate Sustainability in the Context of Sustainable Business Development in the Mining Sector with Elements of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, July.
    20. Zhong, Ziqi & Zhao, Elena Yifei, 2024. "Collaborative driving mode of sustainable marketing and supply chain management supported by metaverse technology," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121160, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13162-024-00276-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.