IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/advdac/v12y2018i3d10.1007_s11634-017-0295-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking an ROC partial area index for evaluating the classification performance at a high specificity range

Author

Listed:
  • Juana-María Vivo

    (University of Murcia)

  • Manuel Franco

    (University of Murcia)

  • Donatella Vicari

    (Sapienza University of Rome)

Abstract

The area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is valuable for evaluating the classification performance described by the entire ROC curve in many fields including decision making and medical diagnosis. However, this can be misleading when clinical tasks demand a restricted specificity range. The partial area under a portion of the ROC curve ( $${ pAUC}$$ p A U C ) has more practical relevance in such situations, but it is usually transformed to overcome some drawbacks and improve its interpretation. The standardized $${ pAUC}$$ p A U C ( $${ SpAUC}$$ S p A U C ) index is considered as a meaningful relative measure of predictive accuracy. Nevertheless, this $${ SpAUC}$$ S p A U C index might still show some limitations due to ROC curves crossing the diagonal line, and to the problem when comparing two tests with crossing ROC curves in the same restricted specificity range. This paper provides an alternative $${ pAUC}$$ p A U C index which overcomes these limitations. Tighter bounds for the $${ pAUC}$$ p A U C of an ROC curve are derived, and then a modified $${ pAUC}$$ p A U C index for any restricted specificity range is established. In addition, the proposed tighter partial area index ( $${ TpAUC}$$ T p A U C ) is also shown for classifier when high specificity must be clinically maintained. The variance of the $${ TpAUC}$$ T p A U C is also studied analytically and by simulation studies in a theoretical framework based on the most typical assumption of a binormal model, and estimated by using nonparametric bootstrap resampling in the empirical examples. Simulated and real datasets illustrate the practical utility of the $${ TpAUC}$$ T p A U C .

Suggested Citation

  • Juana-María Vivo & Manuel Franco & Donatella Vicari, 2018. "Rethinking an ROC partial area index for evaluating the classification performance at a high specificity range," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(3), pages 683-704, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:advdac:v:12:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11634-017-0295-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11634-017-0295-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11634-017-0295-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11634-017-0295-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margaret Sullivan Pepe & Gary Longton & Garnet L. Anderson & Michel Schummer, 2003. "Selecting Differentially Expressed Genes from Microarray Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 133-142, March.
    2. Barbara J. McNeil & James A. Hanley, 1984. "Statistical Approaches to the Analysis of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 4(2), pages 137-150, June.
    3. Donald Dorfman & Edward Alf, 1968. "Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory—A direct solution," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 33(1), pages 117-124, March.
    4. Tian, Lili, 2010. "Confidence interval estimation of partial area under curve based on combined biomarkers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 466-472, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuel Franco & Juana-María Vivo, 2021. "Evaluating the Performances of Biomarkers over a Restricted Domain of High Sensitivity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Man-Jen Hsu & Huey-Miin Hsueh, 2013. "The linear combinations of biomarkers which maximize the partial area under the ROC curves," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 647-666, April.
    2. Manuel Franco & Juana-María Vivo, 2021. "Evaluating the Performances of Biomarkers over a Restricted Domain of High Sensitivity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Osamu Komori, 2011. "A boosting method for maximization of the area under the ROC curve," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(5), pages 961-979, October.
    4. Zhongkai Liu & Howard D. Bondell, 2019. "Binormal Precision–Recall Curves for Optimal Classification of Imbalanced Data," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(1), pages 141-161, April.
    5. Xiangjin Shen & Shiliang Li & Hiroki Tsurumi, 2013. "Comparison of Parametric and Semi-Parametric Binary Response Models," Departmental Working Papers 201308, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
    6. Hossain Ahmed & Beyene Joseph, 2013. "Estimation of weighted log partial area under the ROC curve and its application to MicroRNA expression data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(6), pages 743-755, December.
    7. Xiang, Qinfang & Edwards, Jode & Gadbury, Gary L., 2006. "Interval estimation in a finite mixture model: Modeling P-values in multiple testing applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 570-586, November.
    8. Cheam, Amay S.M. & McNicholas, Paul D., 2016. "Modelling receiver operating characteristic curves using Gaussian mixtures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 192-208.
    9. Shigeyuki Matsui & Shu Zeng & Takeharu Yamanaka & John Shaughnessy, 2008. "Sample Size Calculations Based on Ranking and Selection in Microarray Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 217-226, March.
    10. James A. Hanley, 1988. "The Robustness of the "Binormal" Assumptions Used in Fitting ROC Curves," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 8(3), pages 197-203, August.
    11. Leelambar Singh & Subbarayan Saravanan & J. Jacinth Jennifer & D. Abijith, 2021. "Application of multi-influence factor (MIF) technique for the identification of suitable sites for urban settlement in Tiruchirappalli City, Tamil Nadu, India," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 797-823, October.
    12. Lloyd, Chris J. & Yong, Zhou, 1999. "Kernel estimators of the ROC curve are better than empirical," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 221-228, September.
    13. Xiangjin Shen & Iskander Karibzhanov & Hiroki Tsurumi & Shiliang Li, 2022. "Comparison of Bayesian and Sample Theory Parametric and Semiparametric Binary Response Models," Staff Working Papers 22-31, Bank of Canada.
    14. Jialiang Li & Jason P. Fine, 2010. "Weighted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and its application to gene selection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(4), pages 673-692, August.
    15. Cohen, Jacqueline & Garman, Samuel & Gorr, Wilpen, 2009. "Empirical calibration of time series monitoring methods using receiver operating characteristic curves," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 484-497, July.
    16. K. Drakopoulos & R. S. Randhawa, 2021. "Why Perfect Tests May Not Be Worth Waiting For: Information as a Commodity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6678-6693, November.
    17. Chris J. Lloyd, 2000. "Regression Models for Convex ROC Curves," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 862-867, September.
    18. Roy M. Poses & Randall D. Cebul & Robert M. Centor, 1988. "Eualuating Physicians' Probabilistic Judgments," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 8(4), pages 233-240, December.
    19. George Laking & Joanne Lord & Alastair Fischer, 2006. "The economics of diagnosis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(10), pages 1109-1120, October.
    20. Bickel David R., 2008. "Correcting the Estimated Level of Differential Expression for Gene Selection Bias: Application to a Microarray Study," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advdac:v:12:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11634-017-0295-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.