IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/resrep/v2i31y2019p14-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spoleczna odpowiedzialnosc biznesu – czy to sie oplaca? Analiza stop zwrotu indeksow zrownowazonego rozwoju wzgledem tradycyjnych indeksow gieldowych (Corporate Social Responsibility – Is It Worth It? Analysis of Rates of Return of Sustainable Development Indexes in Relation to Traditional Stock Indexes)

Author

Listed:
  • Rafal Miedziak

    (Wydzial Zarzadzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego)

  • Filip Wojcik

    (Wydzial Zarzadzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego)

Abstract

Increasing social pressure imposed on economic entities by various interest groups should encourage enterprises to act in the field of ethics, ecology and social respect, so as not to build a negative image of the enterprise in the eyes of society. However, according to classical financial management theory, enterprises must maximize the value of the enterprise and the assets of the shareholders. This may create a conflict of interest among different stakeholder/ shareholder groups. The emergence of sustainable indexes allowed us to check whether initiatives emphasizing social responsibility do not limit the growth rate of ownership. As part of this article, it was decided to check whether investing capital in „socially responsible” or „traditional” companies is more effective for investors. To this end, a comparison was made in terms of annual rates of return on traditional and sustainable indexes in different countries. An analysis of variance of return rates was also carried out using the ANOVA method in order to answer the question whether there are noticeable differences in the achieved rates of return. The authors, at the same time, point out that assessing investments only in terms of the expected rate of return may, for many potential investors, be an insufficient criterion for investment selection/assessment; issues such as the company’s environmental policy or the company’s fundamental analysis may also be relevant for them.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafal Miedziak & Filip Wojcik, 2019. "Spoleczna odpowiedzialnosc biznesu – czy to sie oplaca? Analiza stop zwrotu indeksow zrownowazonego rozwoju wzgledem tradycyjnych indeksow gieldowych (Corporate Social Responsibility – Is It Worth It?," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(31), pages 14-24.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgm:resrep:v:2:i:31:y:2019:p:14-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sim.wz.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/artykuly/rafal_miedziak_filip_wojcik.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara Wisse & Rob Eijbergen & Eric F. Rietzschel & Susanne Scheibe, 2018. "Catering to the Needs of an Aging Workforce: The Role of Employee Age in the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Satisfaction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 875-888, February.
    2. Jong-Seo Choi & Young-Min Kwak & Chongwoo Choe, 2010. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 35(3), pages 291-311, December.
    3. Kumar Ramesh & Raiswa Saha & Susoban Goswami & Sekar & Richa Dahiya, 2019. "Consumer's response to CSR activities: Mediating role of brand image and brand attitude," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 377-387, March.
    4. Alexandro Kleine & Michael Hauff, 2009. "Sustainability-Driven Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of the Integrative Sustainability Triangle," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 517-533, April.
    5. Weizhang Sun & Chunguang Zhao & Charles H. Cho, 2019. "Institutional transitions and the role of financial performance in CSR reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 367-376, March.
    6. Caroline Flammer, 2015. "Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(10), pages 1469-1485, October.
    7. Font, Xavier & Garay, Lluis & Jones, Steve, 2016. "A Social Cognitive Theory of sustainability empathy," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 65-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weizhang Sun & Xuan Li & Yanli Geng & Jinfeng Yang & Yifei Zhang, 2020. "Board interlocks and the diffusion of CSR reporting practices: The role of market development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1333-1343, May.
    2. Jong Min Kim & Ying Liu, 2024. "Sustainable Strategies: Navigating Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility for Enlightened Self-Interest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Weizhang Sun & Chunguang Zhao & Charles H. Cho, 2019. "Institutional transitions and the role of financial performance in CSR reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 367-376, March.
    4. Kontesa, Maria & Brahmana, Rayenda Khresna & Mail, Gesti Memarista, 2020. "Does Market Competition Motivate Corporate Social Responsibility? Insight from Malaysia," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 54(1), pages 167-179.
    5. Xuan Li & Chi Zhang & Wenliang Gao & Yanli Geng & Weizhang Sun, 2024. "Foreign ownership, passive‐learning knowledge spillovers, and corporate social responsibility reporting in China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 133-152, January.
    6. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    7. Johan Graafland, 2020. "Competition in technology and innovation, motivation crowding, and environmental policy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 137-145, January.
    8. Park, Moon Deok & Han, Seung Hun, 2023. "Pay dispersion and CSR," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    9. Alexandra ZBUCHEA & Florina PÎNZARU, 2017. "Tailoring CSR Strategy to Company Size?," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(3), pages 415-437, September.
    10. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    11. Victor Hiller & Natacha Raffin, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and workers’ motivation at the industry equilibrium," Post-Print hal-02366298, HAL.
    12. Patrycja Hąbek & Radosław Wolniak, 2016. "Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 399-420, January.
    13. Lai Van Vo & Huong Thi Thu Le & Youngbin Kim, 2023. "Board interlocks, career prospects and corporate social responsibility," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4565-4595, December.
    14. Catherine Le Roux & Marius Pretorius, 2016. "Conceptualizing the Limiting Issues Inhibiting Sustainability Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Tarcia Camily Cavalcante Quezado & Nuno Fortes & William Quezado Figueiredo Cavalcante, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics on Brand Fidelity: The Importance of Brand Love and Brand Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    17. Bose, Sudipta & Saha, Amitav & Khan, Habib Zaman & Islam, Shajul, 2017. "Non-financial disclosure and market-based firm performance: The initiation of financial inclusion," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 263-281.
    18. Yu Jin Chang & Jae Wook Yoo, 2023. "How Does the Degree of Competition in an Industry Affect a Company’s Environmental Management and Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-11, May.
    19. Mario Morales-Parragué & Luis Araya-Castillo & Fidel Molina-Luque & Hugo Moraga-Flores, 2022. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    20. Zhou, Taiyun & Liu, Mingxuan & Zhang, Xiyu & Qi, Zheng & Qin, Ni, 2024. "Does institutional ownership affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 84-98.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    stock markets; corporate social responsibility; sustainable development indexes; stock market indexes; sustainable development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:resrep:v:2:i:31:y:2019:p:14-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.