IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sek/jijoes/v8y2019i2p109-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overcoming Routine: A 21st Century Skill for a 21st Century Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich Strunz

    (Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia)

  • Christian Chlupsa

    (FOM University of Economics and Management)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to show that overcoming routine holds efficiency potential in complex decision environments and to find an indication on what percentage of decision-makers will successfully overcome routine, when thinking time is not incentivized. Curiosity might favor non-routine behavior, as it is the recognition, pursuit and desire to explore uncertain and ambiguous events. Two hundred sixty-two US-American Mturks completed both a curiosity questionnaire and an experiment in the form of a cognitive puzzle game. High values in self-reported ?Joyous Exploration? were not associated with larger numbers of experimental decisions. Contrary to findings where exploration served as a predictor for performance in human-computer interaction and as a mediator for ?error learning? (Frese, 1994), participants who performed better relied less on exploratory decisions. Only about 10 % were able to overcome their routine behavior, confirming that induced routine can have a strong influence on behavior (Betsch, Haberstroh, Glöckner, Haar, & Fiedler, 2001). Those who overcame routine reported higher response times when being framed by unexpected feedback, but solved the experiment more efficiently. This is in line with research that fast, intuitive decisions increase framing effects (Guo et al., 2017) and exploration is time-costly (Athukorala, 2015). As described in research, this study further strengthens insights that performance in solving complex problems relies heavily on rule identification, rule knowledge and rule application (Wüstenberg, Greiff, & Funke, 2012).

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich Strunz & Christian Chlupsa, 2019. "Overcoming Routine: A 21st Century Skill for a 21st Century Economy," International Journal of Economic Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 109-126, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:jijoes:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:109-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-economic-sciences/publication-detail-21983
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-economic-sciences/publication-detail-21983?download=8
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Svenja C. Sommer & Christoph H. Loch, 2004. "Selectionism and Learning in Projects with Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1334-1347, October.
    2. Christian Chlupsa, 2017. "Der Einfluss unbewusster Motive auf den Entscheidungsprozess," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-658-07230-8, March.
    3. Francesco Donnarumma & Domenico Maisto & Giovanni Pezzulo, 2016. "Problem Solving as Probabilistic Inference with Subgoaling: Explaining Human Successes and Pitfalls in the Tower of Hanoi," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-30, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walrave, Bob & Talmar, Madis & Podoynitsyna, Ksenia S. & Romme, A. Georges L. & Verbong, Geert P.J., 2018. "A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 103-113.
    2. Feduzi, Alberto & Runde, Jochen, 2014. "Uncovering unknown unknowns: Towards a Baconian approach to management decision-making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 268-283.
    3. Stefano Magistretti & Daniel Trabucchi, 2025. "Agile-as-a-tool and agile-as-a-culture: a comprehensive review of agile approaches adopting contingency and configuration theories," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 223-253, January.
    4. Van Vliet, Ben, 2017. "Capability satisficing in high frequency trading," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 509-521.
    5. Toon Van de Maele & Bart Dhoedt & Tim Verbelen & Giovanni Pezzulo, 2024. "A hierarchical active inference model of spatial alternation tasks and the hippocampal-prefrontal circuit," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Mario Le Glatin & Benoit Weil, 2018. "Designing Decisions In The Unknown: Towards A Generative Decision Model For Management Science," Post-Print hal-01937103, HAL.
    7. Victoria L. Mitchell & Barrie R. Nault, 2007. "Cooperative Planning, Uncertainty, and Managerial Control in Concurrent Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 375-389, March.
    8. Gambardella, Alfonso, 2013. "The economic value of patented inventions: Thoughts and some open questions," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 626-633.
    9. Morvarid Rahmani & Karthik Ramachandran, 2021. "Delegating Innovation Projects with Deadline: Committed vs. Flexible Stopping," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6317-6332, October.
    10. De Toni, Alberto F. & Pessot, Elena, 2021. "Investigating organisational learning to master project complexity: An embedded case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 541-554.
    11. Stylianos Kavadias & Karl T. Ulrich, 2020. "Innovation and New Product Development: Reflections and Insights from the Research Published in the First 20 Years of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 84-92, January.
    12. Jeffrey G. Covin & Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jyoti P. Gupta & Donald F. Kuratko & Dean A. Shepherd, 2018. "The Interdependence of Planning and Learning among Internal Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(4), pages 537-570, July.
    13. Juha Uotila, 2018. "Punctuated equilibrium or ambidexterity: dynamics of incremental and radical organizational change over time," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(1), pages 131-148.
    14. Natalicchio, A. & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. & Garavelli, A.C., 2017. "Innovation problems and search for solutions in crowdsourcing platforms – A simulation approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 64, pages 28-42.
    15. Svenja C. Sommer & Elliot Bendoly & Stylianos Kavadias, 2020. "How Do You Search for the Best Alternative? Experimental Evidence on Search Strategies to Solve Complex Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1395-1420, March.
    16. Jörg Claussen & Tobias Kretschmer & Nils Stieglitz, 2015. "Vertical Scope, Turbulence, and the Benefits of Commitment and Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 915-929, April.
    17. Lin, Shu-Jou & Lee, Ji-Ren, 2011. "Configuring a corporate venturing portfolio to create growth value: Within-portfolio diversity and strategic linkage," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 489-503, July.
    18. Sanjiv Erat & Vish Krishnan, 2012. "Managing Delegated Search Over Design Spaces," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 606-623, March.
    19. Gil, Nuno & Tether, Bruce S., 2011. "Project risk management and design flexibility: Analysing a case and conditions of complementarity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 415-428, April.
    20. Friederike Wall, 2016. "Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 135-193, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    complex problem solving; dynamic decision making; response time; decision bias; mental model; cognitive reflection; minimal complex system; overcoming routine; non-routine task; curiosity; emotion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:jijoes:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:109-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijoes.iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.