IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/wnewec/y2018i4p39-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Экологические аспекты цифровой экономики // Environmental Issues in a Digital Economy

Author

Listed:
  • R. Perelet A.

    (Institute for System Analysis of the Federal Research Centre “Informatics and Management” of RAS)

  • Р. Перелет А.

    (Институт системного анализа ФИЦ ИУ РАН)

Abstract

Digital technologies play a crucial role in achieving the long-term balance between the techno-sphere and the natural environment that is necessary for sustainable development. The digital economy is a relatively new concept in national policymaking, often using such terms as “information economy” (the 1970s), “knowledge economy” and “electronic economy” (the 1980s), “new economy” (the 1990s) or “network economy” and “Internet economy” (the 2000s). While there is no single definition of the digital economy, there is general agreement on some fundamental principles. The basic idea of a digital economy is that products, services, lifelong learning and innovation are made possible by the computerised transfer and processing of modern technology in the context of market globalisation and sustainable development. Sustainable development is largely related to the preservation of the biosphere and natural capital together with the techno-sphere and the socio-sphere. However, in real life, environmental aspects are often overlooked. In recent years, there have been changes in the formation of the economies of countries, especially in strengthening their environmental component. Reducing the cost of sensor technology and the spread of networks allow you to connect each component entering the production process. The data collected through such connections provide an opportunity to know the place of origin of the product, the method of production and the amount of energy spent on its production. Information received on their basis gives to companies, cities and whole countries the opportunity to restore, create, and to relocate these resources more effectively. It is proposed to take into account the impact of the digital economy on the environment. The EU response is increasingly seen as a strong combination of the knowledge economy and the green new deal. Цифровые технологии играют решающую роль в достижении долгосрочного баланса между техносферой и природной средой, которая необходима для устойчивого развития. Цифровая экономика является относительно новой концепцией в разработке национальной политики, использующей часто такие термины, как «информационная экономика» (1970-е гг.), «экономика знаний» и «электронная экономика» (1980-е гг.), «новая экономика» (1990-е гг.) или «сетевая экономика» и «интернет-экономика» (2000-е гг). Хотя нет единого определения цифровой экономики, существует общее согласие в отношении некоторых основополагающих принципов. Основная идея цифровой экономики заключается в том, что производство продуктов, услуг, обучение на протяжении всей жизни и инновации становятся возможными благодаря компьютеризированной передаче и обработке современной технологии в контексте глобализации рынка и устойчивого развития. Устойчивое развитие является во многом связанным с сохранением биосферы и природного капитала совместно с техносферой и социосферой. Однако в реальной жизни на экологические аспекты часто не обращают должного внимания. В последние годы произошли изменения в формировании экономики стран, особенно в укреплении экологической составляющей. Снижение стоимости сенсорных технологий и распространение сетей позволяют подключить каждый компонент, поступающий в производственный процесс. Данные, которые собираются через такие подключения, дают возможность узнать место происхождения продукта, способ производства и количество энергии, затраченной на его производство. Получаемая на их основе информация дает предприятиям, городам и целым странам возможность более эффективно восстанавливать, создавать и перебазировать эти ресурсы. Предлагается учитывать вопросы воздействия цифровой экономики на окружающую среду. Реакция Евросоюза все чаще рассматривается как сочетание экономики знаний и «зеленого нового курса».

Suggested Citation

  • R. Perelet A. & Р. Перелет А., 2018. "Экологические аспекты цифровой экономики // Environmental Issues in a Digital Economy," Мир новой экономики // The world of new economy, Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Governtment оf The Russian Federation, vol. 12(4), pages 39-45.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:wnewec:y:2018:i:4:p:39-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/207/199.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen Nadia CIOCOIU, 2011. "Integrating Digital Economy And Green Economy: Opportunities For Sustainable Development," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(1), pages 33-43, February.
    2. Rinaldo Evangelista & Paolo Guerrieri & Valentina Meliciani, 2014. "The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(8), pages 802-824, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biagi, Federico & Falk, Martin, 2017. "The impact of ICT and e-commerce on employment in Europe," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-18.
    2. Ran, Qiying & Yang, Xiaodong & Yan, Hongchuan & Xu, Yang & Cao, Jianhong, 2023. "Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: Does the digital economy matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Beier, Grischa & Matthess, Marcel & Shuttleworth, Luke & Guan, Ting & de Oliveira Pereira Grudzien, David Iubel & Xue, Bing & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Chen, Ling, 2022. "Implications of Industry 4.0 on industrial employment: A comparative survey from Brazilian, Chinese, and German practitioners," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Chien‐Chiang Lee & Ying Yuan & Huwei Wen, 2022. "Can digital economy alleviate CO2 emissions in the transport sector? Evidence from provincial panel data in China," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(3), pages 289-310, August.
    5. Armenia ANDRONICEANU & Mehari FISSEHA, 2011. "The Critical Challenges For Migration Policy In The European Union?," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 27-35, June.
    6. Javier Cifuentes-Faura & Ursula Faura-Martínez & Matilde Lafuente-Lechuga, 2020. "Assessment of Sustainable Development in Secondary School Economics Students According to Gender," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Rinaldo Evangelista, 2018. "Technology and Economic Development: The Schumpeterian Legacy," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 136-153, March.
    8. Xiangyu Tian & Yuanxi Zhang & Guohua Qu, 2022. "The Impact of Digital Economy on the Efficiency of Green Financial Investment in China’s Provinces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Armenia ANDRONICEANU, 2011. "Transparency Of The Romanian Local Public Administration," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2011(17), pages 33-46, December.
    10. Huang, Yuhong, 2024. "Digital transformation of enterprises: Job creation or job destruction?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    11. Wang, Weilong & Yang, Xiaodong & Cao, Jianhong & Bu, Wenchao & Dagestani, Abd Alwahed & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday & Dilanchiev, Azer & Ren, Siyu, 2022. "Energy internet, digital economy, and green economic growth: Evidence from China," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 1(2).
    12. Thonipara, Anita & Sternberg, Rolf G. & Proeger, Till & Haefner, Lukas, 2020. "Assessing the Digital Divide and its Regional Determinants: Evidence from a Web-Scraping Analysis," ifh Working Papers 25/2020, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh), revised 2020.
    13. Martin Falk & Eva Hagsten, 2018. "Employment impacts of market novelty sales: evidence for nine European Countries," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(2), pages 119-137, June.
    14. Kai-Michael Griese & Gerrit Hirschfeld & Simon Baringhorst, 2019. "Unternehmen zwischen Digitalisierung und Nachhaltigkeit – eine empirische Untersuchung," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 11-21, March.
    15. Zhang, Wei & Liu, Xuemeng & Wang, Die & Zhou, Jianping, 2022. "Digital economy and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China's city level," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    16. Armenia ANDRONICEANU, 2012. "Electronic Services, A Real Support For Citizens And Business Community," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(3), pages 37-45, September.
    17. Adriana Grigorescu & Elena Pelinescu & Amalia Elena Ion & Monica Florica Dutcas, 2021. "Human Capital in Digital Economy: An Empirical Analysis of Central and Eastern European Countries from the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Ponomareva, E., 2021. "Digitalization as a driver of economic growth: Does only infrastructure matters?," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 51-68.
    19. Vujica Lazovic & Biljana Rondovic & Danijela Lazovic & Tamara Djurickovic, 2021. "Is Economic Theory, Presented in Basic Academic Textbooks, Applicable to the Digital Economy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    20. Sumona Mukhuty & Arvind Upadhyay & Holly Rothwell, 2022. "Strategic sustainable development of Industry 4.0 through the lens of social responsibility: The role of human resource practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2068-2081, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:wnewec:y:2018:i:4:p:39-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://worldneweconomy.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.