IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2019i6p63-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Финансовое управление инновационной активностью // Financial Management of Innovative Activity

Author

Listed:
  • V. Shestak P.

    (National Research Nuclear University MEPhI)

  • E. Moreva I.

    (Financial University)

  • I. Tyutyunnik G.

    (Financial University)

  • В. Шестак П.

    (Национальный исследовательский ядерный университет «МИФИ»)

  • Е. Морева Л.

    (Финансовый университет)

  • И. Тютюнник Г.

    (Финансовый университет)

Abstract

Increasing investment activity is a key problem for Russia. Despite many state’s efforts, investment activity is low. The aim of the article is to propose an innovation management method based on a systems approach. The main objective of the research is to find an effective approach to optimizing state efforts to enhance financial management of innovative activity. The research methodology is based on the analysis of the enterprise closed innovation system. Economic and mathematical methods are used to represent the management function as an operator equation of the first kind. This allows to create a control algorithm to maximize the effectiveness. The methods of computational diagnostics and tomographic economics are used for the element-by-element analysis of the subsystems of the innovation system. The information base for the study was publications concerning the theory of management and business management. The possibility of applying computational diagnostic methods to optimize the financial management of innovation activity was proved by separating the controlling and controlled subsystems of the enterprise innovation system and observing all laws of production. A form of control functional was obtained on the sets of observable characteristics of the controlling and controlled subsystems while optimizing the results of innovative activity due to the feedback channel. The results of the study may be of practical interest for innovative projects in order to transfer the enterprise to innovative development, in particular, in relation to the restructuring of organizational structures and institutional support in the digital economy format. Проблема повышения инвестиционной активности в России стоит очень остро. Несмотря на многочисленные усилия государства, инвестиционная активность находится на низком уровне. Цель статьи — предложить методику управления инновационной активностью, основанную на системном подходе. Основная задача исследования — поиск эффективного подхода к оптимизации государственных усилий для активизации финансового управления инновационной активностью. Методология исследования построена на анализе замкнутой инновационной системы предприятия. Используются экономико-математические методы для представления функции управления в виде операторного уравнения первого рода. Это позволяет создать алгоритм управления для достижения максимальной эффективности. Использованы методы вычислительной диагностики и томографической экономики для поэлементного анализа подсистем инновационной системы. Информационной базой исследования стали публикации, касающиеся теории и менеджмента управления. Доказана возможность применения методов вычислительной диагностики для оптимизации финансового управления инновационной деятельностью путем разделения управляющих и управляемых подсистем инновационной системы предприятия и соблюдения всех законов организации производства. Получена форма функционала управления на множествах наблюдаемых характеристик управляющей и управляемой подсистем при оптимизации результатов инновационной активности за счет канала обратной связи. Результаты исследования могут представлять практический интерес при формировании инновационных проектов в целях перехода предприятия к инновационному развитию, в частности в отношении реструктуризации организационных структур и институционального обеспечения в формате цифровой экономики.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Shestak P. & E. Moreva I. & I. Tyutyunnik G. & В. Шестак П. & Е. Морева Л. & И. Тютюнник Г., 2019. "Финансовое управление инновационной активностью // Financial Management of Innovative Activity," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 23(6), pages 63-75.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2019:i:6:p:63-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/928/617.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/928/627.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juma, Calestous, 2016. "Innovation and Its Enemies: Why People Resist New Technologies," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190467036.
    2. Aleksandr Kuklin & Gennadiy Bystray & Sergey Okhotnikov & Elena Chistova, 2015. "Economic Tomography: Opportunity to Foresee and Respond to Socio-Economic Crises," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 40-53.
    3. Kusterer, David J. & Schmitz, Patrick W., 2017. "The management of innovation: Experimental evidence," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 706-725.
    4. Eugenia L. Moreva, 2018. "Venture Capital in Russia and the Global Evolution of Venture Capital," Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, Lifescience Global, vol. 7, pages 843-850.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philipp Aerni, 2021. "The Ethics of Farm Animal Biotechnology from an Anthropological Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Junzhao Ma & Dewi Tojib & Yelena Tsarenko, 2022. "Sex Robots: Are We Ready for Them? An Exploration of the Psychological Mechanisms Underlying People’s Receptiveness of Sex Robots," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 1091-1107, July.
    3. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269, September.
    4. Darcy W. E. Allen & Jason Potts & Julian Waters-Lynch & Max Parasol, 2024. "Costly Signalling in DAOs," Papers 2406.18457, arXiv.org.
    5. Ian Miles, 2020. "A Disrupted Future?," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 6-27.
    6. Henry Etzkowitz & Alex Mack & Thomas Schaffer & Jim Scopa & Lei Guo & Tatiana Pospelova, 2020. "Innovation by design: SPARK and the Overcoming of Stanford University's Translational “Valley of Death” in Bio‐Medicine," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 1113-1125, September.
    7. Kusterer, David J. & Schmitz, Patrick W., 2020. "Public goods, property rights, and investment incentives: An experimental investigation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 514-532.
    8. Theo Papaioannou, 2021. "The Idea of Justice in Innovation: Applying Non-Ideal Political Theory to Address Questions of Sustainable Public Policy in Emerging Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Schmitz, Patrick W., 2017. "Incomplete contracts, shared ownership, and investment incentives," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 153-165.
    10. Olga Romanova & Vladimir Strovskiy, 2016. "Development of the Methodology for the Economic Evaluation of Managerial Decisions as a Factor of Economic Security Increase," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 937-950.
    11. Jack Stilgoe & Tom Cohen, 2021. "Rejecting acceptance: learning from public dialogue on self-driving vehicles [Crowdsourcing Moral Machines]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(6), pages 849-859.
    12. Adu-Baffour, Ferdinand & Daum, Thomas & Birner, Regina, 2019. "Can small farms benefit from big companies’ initiatives to promote mechanization in Africa? A case study from Zambia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 133-145.
    13. O'Brien, Patrick, 2018. "Cosmographies for the discovery, development and diffusion of useful and reliable knowledge in pre-industrial Europe and Late imperial China: a survey and speculation," Economic History Working Papers 90534, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    14. Vitaliy Lazhentsev, 2018. "Socio-Economic Space and Territorial Development of the North and the Arctic of Russia," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 353-365.
    15. LOBOV, Daniil & RYBIN, Mikhail, 2021. "Openness To External Innovation In Major Oil And Gas Companies," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 21(1), pages 47-66.
    16. Mikayla Novak, 2024. "Sociologically influenced coevolutionary dynamics," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 473-493, October.
    17. Nadezhda Necheuhinа & Olga Mustafina & Lyudmila Kuklina, 2018. "Competitiveness of Various Segments of the Regional Consumer Market," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 836-850.
    18. Gagnon, Mark A. & Broad, Garrett & Grandison, Kelia & Chiles, Robert M., 2022. "AgriTech investor and informant perspectives about cellular agriculture," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 26(01), September.
    19. Wu, Min & Lin, Angie Shi Qi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2024. "The effects of motivated consumer innovativeness on consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Schmitz, Patrick W. & Kusterer, David J., 2018. "Government versus Private Ownership of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 13204, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2019:i:6:p:63-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.