IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2019i1p133-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Модели оценки рисков деятельности компаний, реализующих проекты с НИОКР // Risk Assessment Models of the Companies Implementing R&D Projects

Author

Listed:
  • V. Minasyan В.

    (Higher School of Finance and Management Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • В. Минасян Б.

    (Высшая школа финансов и менеджмента РАНХиГС при Президенте РФ)

Abstract

Companies implementing R&D projects face their unique features. There is the need for large capital investments, long-term implementation, high growth potential, low probability of success, and diffculties in fnancing among them. Implementation of such projects is associated with high risks. This leads to underfunding as uncertain results deter investors. The problem of assessing the risks arising from the implementation of such projects has not yet been suffciently studied at the level of mathematical analysis models. The objective of the article is to develop a model allowing to explore the risks arising from implementing R&D projects. The author has developed a risk assessment model using the VaR measure modifed for this application. The formulas have been obtained to calculate this measure. They have been adjusted to simple analytical expressions assuming the balanced distribution of cash flow from the project, or triangular distribution. The model considers the most important causes of risks in R&D projects. It can be used in a real-case scenario if a preliminary risk assessment of a project is done before its implementation and a decision is made on risk-based implementation. Moreover, this methodology can be used to standardize the decision-making process for the R&D projects implementation considering the “risk appetite” using the VaR risk measure. Компании, реализующие проекты с НИОКР (R&D), сталкиваются с их уникальными особенностями. Среди них: необходимость больших капитальных вложений, длительный срок реализации, высокий потенциал роста, низкая вероятность успеха, трудности с финансированием. Реализация подобных проектов связана с большими рисками. Это приводит к их недофинансированию, так как неопределенность результатов отпугивает инвесторов. Проблема оценки рисков, возникающих при реализации таких проектов, на уровне математических моделей анализа пока недостаточно исследована. Цель статьи — разработка модели, позволяющей исследовать риски, возникающие при реализации компаниями проектов с НИОКР (R&D). Автором разработана модель для оценки подобных рисков при помощи модифицированной для данного применения меры VaR. Получены формулы для расчета данной меры. Они доведены до простых аналитических выражений в предположениях равномерного распределения денежного потока от проекта, или треугольного распределения. Построенная модель учитывает важнейшие причины возникновения рисков в проектах с R&D. Ее можно использовать на практике при предварительной оценке риска проекта еще до его реализации и принятия решения о реализации с учетом риска. Кроме того, данную методику можно использовать и для стандартизации процесса принятия решения о реализации проектов с R&D c учетом «аппетита к риску» с применением меры риска VaR.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Minasyan В. & В. Минасян Б., 2019. "Модели оценки рисков деятельности компаний, реализующих проекты с НИОКР // Risk Assessment Models of the Companies Implementing R&D Projects," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 23(1), pages 133-146.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2019:i:1:p:133-146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/824/548.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hall, Bronwyn H. & Lerner, Josh, 2010. "The Financing of R&D and Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 609-639, Elsevier.
    2. Richard T. Thakor & Andrew W. Lo, 2017. "Optimal Financing for R&D-Intensive Firms," NBER Working Papers 23831, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hickfang, Michael & Holder, Ulrike, 2018. "The impact of stock options on risk-taking: Founder-CEOs and innovation," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 12/2018, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    2. Jingyi Zhong & Weide Chun & Wu Deng & Hui Gao, 2023. "Can Mergers and Acquisitions Promote Technological Innovation in the New Energy Industry? An Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Lithium Battery Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-25, August.
    3. Atal, Vidya & Bar, Talia & Gordon, Sidartha, 2016. "Project selection: Commitment and competition," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 30-48.
    4. Cowling, Marc & Ughetto, Elisa & Lee, Neil, 2018. "The innovation debt penalty: Cost of debt, loan default, and the effects of a public loan guarantee on high-tech firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 166-176.
    5. Honjo, Yuji & Ikeuchi, Kenta & Nakamura, Hiroki, 2024. "Does risk aversion affect individuals’ interests and actions in angel investing? Empirical evidence from Japan," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Hirokazu Mizobata & Hiroshi Teruyama, 2020. "Factor Adjustments and Liquidity Management: Evidence from Japan's Two Lost Decades and Financial Crises," KIER Working Papers 1043, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    7. Herz, Holger & Schunk, Daniel & Zehnder, Christian, 2014. "How do judgmental overconfidence and overoptimism shape innovative activity?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-23.
    8. Ufuk Akcigit & Douglas Hanley & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2022. "Optimal Taxation and R&D Policies," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(2), pages 645-684, March.
    9. Qureshi, Irfan & Park, Donghyun & Crespi, Gustavo Atilio & Benavente, Jose Miguel, 2021. "Trends and determinants of innovation in Asia and the Pacific vs. Latin America and the Caribbean," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1287-1309.
    10. Tan, Xiujie & Yan, Yaxue & Dong, Yuyang, 2022. "Peer effect in green credit induced green innovation: An empirical study from China's Green Credit Guidelines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Jürgen Janger & Michael Böheim & Martin Falk & Rahel Falk & Werner Hölzl & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Michael Peneder & Andreas Reinstaller & Fabian Unterlass & Gunther Tichy, 2010. "Research and Innovation Policy after the Crisis," Austrian Economic Quarterly, WIFO, vol. 15(4), pages 321-335, December.
    12. Verhoeven, Dennis & Bakker, Jurriën & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2016. "Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 707-723.
    13. Yang Li & Yuanzhu Wang & Rajah Rasiah, 2023. "Research on the Influence of Tax Incentives and Financing Constraints on NEEQ Enterprises’ Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.
    14. de Haas, Ralph & Popov, A., 2018. "Financial Development and Industrial Pollution," Other publications TiSEM a0a4fb82-734a-442a-9ea1-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Çağatay Bircan & Ralph De Haas, 2020. "The Limits of Lending? Banks and Technology Adoption across Russia," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(2), pages 536-609.
    16. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2022. "Top R&D investors, structural change and the R&D growth performance of young and old firms," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, March.
    17. Didier, Tatiana & Levine, Ross & Llovet Montanes, Ruth & Schmukler, Sergio L., 2021. "Capital market financing and firm growth," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    18. Jean Acheson & Rory Malone, 2020. "Respect Your Elders: Evidence from Ireland’s R&D Tax Credit Reform," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 51(1), pages 105-131.
    19. Kadri Männasoo & Heili Hein, 2017. "Are R&D companies credit-constrained? Credit frictions during and post-crisis," TUT Economic Research Series 29, Department of Finance and Economics, Tallinn University of Technology.
    20. Chiara Pederzoli & Grid Thoma & Costanza Torricelli, 2013. "Modelling Credit Risk for Innovative SMEs: the Role of Innovation Measures," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 44(1), pages 111-129, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2019:i:1:p:133-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.