IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/econom/y2018i4p44-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Особенности влияния санкций на отраслевое развитие экономики России // Specifics of the Impact of Sanctions on the Sectoral Development of the Russian Economy

Author

Listed:
  • S. Varvus A.

    (Financial University, Moscow)

  • С. Варвус А.

    (Финансовый университет, Москва)

Abstract

The subject of research is the consequences of the impact of sanctions on a regional economy through the agricultural sector because the imposition of sanctions and the import substitution policy in agriculture have influenced all stages of the reproduction process, being an extra stimulus to the development of the sector. The paper examines the agricultural sector in the light of the import substitution policy and the effects of the first and second orders of sanctions. The purpose of research was to analyze the economic relationships of the largest agro-industrial holdings that are built along the value-added chain and influence the development of the region. The paper concludes that despite the sanctions, the industry is on the rise. However, due to second-order factors (high loan interest, long payback periods, etc.), the dynamic development trend may exhaust itself. Therefore, the state should continue to support the agriculture that has an indirect effect on the socio-economic level of regional development. Предмет исследования — последствия воздействия санкций на экономическое положение региона через отрасль сельского хозяйства ввиду того, что наложение санкций и политика импортозамещения в сельском хозяйстве повлияли на все стадии воспроизводственного процесса, выступая дополнительным стимулом к развитию данной отрасли. В работе рассмотрена отрасль сельского хозяйства, которая испытывает на себе действие политики импортозамещения и эффектов первого и второго порядка санкций. Цель работы — анализ экономических отношений крупнейших агропромышленных холдингов, которые складываются вдоль цепочки создания добавленной стоимости и влияют на уровень развития региона. В работе сделаны выводы, что, несмотря на санкции, отрасль динамично развивается. Но из-за факторов второго порядка (высоких процентов по кредиту, больших сроков окупаемости проектов и т.д.) тенденция динамичного развития может себя исчерпать. Поэтому государство должно и дальше поддерживать сельское хозяйство, которое опосредованно влияет на социально-экономический уровень развития регионов.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Varvus A. & С. Варвус А., 2018. "Особенности влияния санкций на отраслевое развитие экономики России // Specifics of the Impact of Sanctions on the Sectoral Development of the Russian Economy," Экономика. Налоги. Право // Economics, taxes & law, ФГОБУ "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 11(4), pages 44-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2018:i:4:p:44-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economy.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/431/414.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Navin A. Bapat & Tobias Heinrich & Yoshiharu Kobayashi & T. Clifton Morgan, 2013. "Determinants of Sanctions Effectiveness: Sensitivity Analysis Using New Data," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 79-98, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Morgan, T. Clifton & Syropoulos, Constantinos & Yotov, Yoto V., 2021. "Understanding economic sanctions: Interdisciplinary perspectives on theory and evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Matthieu Crozet & Julian Hinz, 2023. "Blowback: The Effect of Sanctions on Democratic Elections," Working Papers hal-04150484, HAL.
    3. William Seitz & Alberto Zazzaro, 2020. "Sanctions and public opinion: The case of the Russia-Ukraine gas disputes," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 817-843, October.
    4. Mirkina, Irina, 2018. "FDI and sanctions: An empirical analysis of short- and long-run effects," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 198-225.
    5. Meiramkul Saiymova & Nurken Baikadamov & Yuliya Tyurina & Georgiy Kutsuri & Lola Sanginova & Marija Troyanskaya, 2021. "Russia s Petroleum Industry in the Period of Sanctions and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(5), pages 483-489.
    6. Kerim Can Kavakli & Giovanna Marcolongo & Diego Zambiasi, 2023. "Sanction Evasion Through Tax Havens," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 23212, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    7. van Bergeijk, Peter A. G. & Hossain Siddiquee, Muhammad Shahadat, 2015. "Bias and methodological change in economic sanction reconsidered," Economics Discussion Papers 2015-33, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    8. David Lektzian & Gor Mkrtchian, 2021. "The effect of sanctions on economic freedom," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2776-2794, November.
    9. Tobias Heinrich & Yoshiharu Kobayashi, 2022. "Evaluating explanations for poverty selectivity in foreign aid," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 30-47, February.
    10. Urtuzuastigui, Jerry & Koren, Ore, 2024. "Targeted sanctions, resource substitution, and violence against civilians: Localized evidence from African states," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    11. RezaeeDaryakenari, Babak, 2024. "Who Rallies Round the Flag? The Impact of the US Sanctions on Iranians’ Attitude Toward the Government," SocArXiv r7ae4, Center for Open Science.
    12. Mikhail A Alexseev & Henry E Hale, 2020. "Crimea come what may: Do economic sanctions backfire politically?," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(2), pages 344-359, March.
    13. Menevis Cilizoglu & Navin A Bapat, 2020. "Economic coercion and the problem of sanctions-proofing," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(4), pages 385-408, July.
    14. Estrada, Mario Arturo Ruiz & Koutronas, Evangelos, 2022. "The impact of the Russian Aggression against Ukraine on the Russia-EU Trade," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 599-616.
    15. Demena, B.A. & Benalcazar Jativa, G. & Reta, A.S. & Kimararungu, P.B. & van Bergeijk, P.A.G., 2021. "Does research on economic sanctions suffer from publication bias?," ISS Working Papers - General Series 674, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    16. Anna Miromanova, 2023. "The effectiveness of embargoes: Evidence from Russia," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 906-940, April.
    17. Morgan, T. Clifton & Kobayashi, Yoshiharu, 2021. "Talking to the hand: Bargaining, strategic interaction, and economic sanctions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Mohammad Hossein Ronaghi, 2021. "Open-source software migration under sanctions conditions," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1132-1145, December.
    19. Ryan Yu-Lin Liou & Amanda Murdie & Dursun Peksen, 2023. "Pressures From Home and Abroad: Economic Sanctions and Target Government Response to Domestic Campaigns," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(2-3), pages 297-325, February.
    20. Yulia S. Timofeeva, 2021. "US Sanctions Against Financial Companies: Key Features," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 39-51, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2018:i:4:p:44-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://economy.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.