IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v12y2021i6d10.1007_s13198-021-01329-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open-source software migration under sanctions conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Hossein Ronaghi

    (Shiraz University)

Abstract

Open-source software (OSS) has been widely used in the process of software development for the purpose of shortening the process development and reducing its costs. The growing process of OSS has put out new ways for development, distribution and correspondence of software in organizations. Countries under international sanctions are facing extreme limitations over financial transactions and technology transmissions with different countries; therefore, individuals and companies working in such territories are involved with legal limitations and limits of copyright as to using and having access to software. This research seeks to evaluate the acceptance of OSS in a country under sanction, that’s to say Iran. In this research the developed value-based acceptance model has been used. The statistical population of the study was individuals active in software and information technology industry in Iran. The sampling method was convenience sampling. The results indicated that the sanction has a significant effect on the perceived value of OSS (β = 0.72, p = 0.000) and eventually its usage. Besides, usefulness (β = 0.69, p = 0.001), perceived enjoyment (β = 0.54, p = 0.000) and facilitating conditions (β = 0.58, p = 0.002) are considered as factors effective in applying OSS. As a result, one of the solutions of technology development in sanctioned organizations is to use OSS.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Hossein Ronaghi, 2021. "Open-source software migration under sanctions conditions," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1132-1145, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:12:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01329-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-021-01329-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-021-01329-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-021-01329-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Navin A. Bapat & Tobias Heinrich & Yoshiharu Kobayashi & T. Clifton Morgan, 2013. "Determinants of Sanctions Effectiveness: Sensitivity Analysis Using New Data," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 79-98, January.
    2. Ronaghi, Mohammad Hossein & Forouharfar, Amir, 2020. "A contextualized study of the usage of the Internet of things (IoTs) in smart farming in a typical Middle Eastern country within the context of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Qu, Wen Guang & Yang, Zhiyong & Wang, Zhongming, 2011. "Multi-level framework of open source software adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(9), pages 997-1003, September.
    4. Muwanguzi, Samuel & Musambira, George, 2019. "The adoption of open source software in Uganda: Analyzing stakeholders and their underlying interests," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    5. Rajdeep Grewal & Gary L. Lilien & Girish Mallapragada, 2006. "Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1043-1056, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuk, George & Schaarschmidt, Mario & Homscheid, Dirk, 2024. "All of the same breed? A networking perspective of private-collective innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Xuan Yang & Xiao Li & Daning Hu & Harry Jiannan Wang, 2021. "Differential impacts of social influence on initial and sustained participation in open source software projects," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(9), pages 1133-1147, September.
    3. Dequiedt, Vianney & Zenou, Yves, 2017. "Local and consistent centrality measures in parameterized networks," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 28-36.
    4. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Morgan, T. Clifton & Syropoulos, Constantinos & Yotov, Yoto V., 2021. "Understanding economic sanctions: Interdisciplinary perspectives on theory and evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Gandal Neil & Naftaliev Peter & Stettner Uriel, 2017. "Following the Code: Spillovers and Knowledge Transfer," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 243-267, September.
    6. Julio Henrique Costa Nobrega & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Vasco Sanchez-Rodrigues & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Walter Leal Filho & Milena Pavan Serafim & Rosley Anholon, 2021. "Logistics 4.0 in Brazil: Critical Analysis and Relationships with SDG 9 Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Matthieu Crozet & Julian Hinz, 2023. "Blowback: The Effect of Sanctions on Democratic Elections," Working Papers hal-04150484, HAL.
    8. Olga Lavrinenko & Svetlana Ignatjeva & Alina Betlej & Alina Danileviča & Vladimir Menshikov & Oleg Rybalkin, 2022. "Mobile internet in the EU: problems and perspectives," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(3), pages 369-383, March.
    9. Wen Wen & Chris Forman & Stuart J. H. Graham, 2013. "Research Note ---The Impact of Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement on Open Source Software Project Success," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1131-1146, December.
    10. Girish Mallapragada & Nandini Lahiri & Atul Nerkar, 2016. "Peer Review and Research Impact," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 3(1), pages 29-41, March.
    11. Meiramkul Saiymova & Nurken Baikadamov & Yuliya Tyurina & Georgiy Kutsuri & Lola Sanginova & Marija Troyanskaya, 2021. "Russia s Petroleum Industry in the Period of Sanctions and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(5), pages 483-489.
    12. Sodam Baek & Kibae Kim & Jorn Altmann, 2014. "Role of Platform Providers in Service Networks: The Case of Salesforce.com AppExchange," TEMEP Discussion Papers 2014112, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised May 2014.
    13. Liu, Sen & Chan, Felix T.S. & Yang, Junai & Niu, Ben, 2018. "Understanding the effect of cloud computing on organizational agility: An empirical examination," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 98-111.
    14. Kexiao Xie & Yuerui Zhu & Yongqiang Ma & Youcheng Chen & Shuiji Chen & Zhidan Chen, 2022. "Willingness of Tea Farmers to Adopt Ecological Agriculture Techniques Based on the UTAUT Extended Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Yuqing Ren & Jilin Chen & John Riedl, 2016. "The Impact and Evolution of Group Diversity in Online Open Collaboration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1668-1686, June.
    16. Hallin, Christina & Holm, Ulf & Sharma, Dharma Deo, 2011. "Embeddedness of innovation receivers in the multinational corporation: Effects on business performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 362-373, June.
    17. Han-Lin Li & Yao-Huei Huang & Shu-Cherng Fang, 2017. "Linear Reformulation of Polynomial Discrete Programming for Fast Computation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 108-122, February.
    18. Shiu, Jing-Ming & Dallas, Mark P. & Huang, Hui-Hsuan, 2023. "A friend of a friend? Informal authority, social capital, and networks in telecommunications standard-setting organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. David Lektzian & Gor Mkrtchian, 2021. "The effect of sanctions on economic freedom," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2776-2794, November.
    20. Tobias Heinrich & Yoshiharu Kobayashi, 2022. "Evaluating explanations for poverty selectivity in foreign aid," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 30-47, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Open-source software (OSS); Sanction; Perceived value; Adoption intention; Perceived risk;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O36 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Open Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:12:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01329-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.