IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v6y1992i4p557-575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Segregation in the Engineering and Science Professions: A Case of Continuity and Change

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Devine

    (University of Liverpool)

Abstract

It has been argued that gender segregation may be declining or, at least, that more complex and subtle forms of gender segregation are now discernible as women acquire the necessary educational credentials to enter previously male-dominated professional occupations. Drawing on a case study of engineering and science, it will be seen that the `gendered' nature of subject choices in the educational system accounts for the persistence of gender segregation in the technical professions. Moreover, despite the introduction of equal opportunity legislation, the small number of women acquiring technical degrees still face discrimination from hostile managers in the recruitment process, and childcare and domestic responsibilities continue to block their occupational mobility within organisations where uninterrupted linear careers are the norm. The `liberal feminist' strategy of acquiring the necessary `human capital' to undermine social closure, in other words, has not substantially reduced horizontal and vertical gender segregation in technical professions historically almost exclusively dominated by men.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Devine, 1992. "Gender Segregation in the Engineering and Science Professions: A Case of Continuity and Change," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 6(4), pages 557-575, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:6:y:1992:i:4:p:557-575
    DOI: 10.1177/095001709264002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095001709264002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095001709264002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zafiris Tzannatos, 1990. "Employment Segregation: Can We Measure It and What Does the Measure Mean?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 28(1), pages 105-111, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jill Rubery & Colette Fagan, 1995. "Gender Segregation in Societal Context," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 9(2), pages 213-240, June.
    2. D Perrons, 1994. "Measuring Equal Opportunities in European Employment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(8), pages 1195-1220, August.
    3. Gillian Whitehouse, 1992. "Legislation and Labour Market Gender Inequality: An Analysis of OECD Countries," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 6(1), pages 65-86, March.
    4. Robert M. Blackburn & Jennifer Jarman & Janet Siltanen, 1993. "The Analysis of Occupational Gender Segregation Over Time and Place: Considerations of Measurement and Some New Evidence," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 7(3), pages 335-362, September.
    5. Martin Watts, 1992. "How Should Occupational Sex Segregation be Measured?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 6(3), pages 475-487, September.
    6. Francis Green, 1991. "Sex Discrimination in Job-Related Training," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 295-304, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:6:y:1992:i:4:p:557-575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.