IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v58y2021i11p2188-2206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualising and measuring the location of work: Work location as a probability space

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Shearmur

Abstract

There is currently considerable interest in workers performing tasks from a variety of workplaces, such as co-working spaces, transport-networks and cafés. However, it remains difficult to ascertain the extent to which this workplace mobility is altering urban economic geography, since most analyses of the location of economic activity in cities are based upon census-type data that assume a unique place of work for each worker. In this paper I propose a framework that extends the concept of place of work: work is probabilistically assigned to different types of workplace according to the proportion of work time spent in each. The limitations of census data are discussed and illustrated, after which the framework is operationalised in an exploratory survey. Census data suggest a modest increase in workplace mobility, with most work still taking place either at home or in a fixed workplace. The paper’s principal contribution is to explain these data’s limitations and show how work location can be operationalised as a probability space.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Shearmur, 2021. "Conceptualising and measuring the location of work: Work location as a probability space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2188-2206, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:11:p:2188-2206
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098020912124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098020912124
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098020912124?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald Hislop, 2013. "Driving, Communicating and Working: Understanding the Work-related Communication Behaviours of Business Travellers on Work-related Car Journeys," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 220-237, May.
    2. McCann, Philip, 2013. "Modern Urban and Regional Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199582006.
    3. Eve Chiapello & Luc Boltanski, 1999. "Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme," Post-Print hal-00680085, HAL.
    4. Felstead, Alan, 2012. "Rapid change or slow evolution? Changing places of work and their consequences in the UK," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 31-38.
    5. Gerald Friedman, 2014. "Workers without employers: shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 171-188, April.
    6. Chloé Duvivier & Mario Polèse & Philippe Apparicio, 2018. "The location of information technology-led new economy jobs in cities: office parks or cool neighbourhoods?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(6), pages 756-767, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthias Sweet & Darren M Scott, 2024. "What might working from home mean for the geography of work and commuting in the Greater Golden Horseshoe, Canada?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 567-588, February.
    2. Darja Reuschke & Carol Ekinsmyth, 2021. "New spatialities of work in the city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2177-2187, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crawford, Fiona, 2020. "Segmenting travellers based on day-to-day variability in work-related travel behaviour," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Francesca Coin & Marco Marrone, 2018. "Ambivalence. Luci e ombre del lavoro digitale," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 25-35.
    3. Bernard Billaudot, 2009. "L'ambivalence de la RSE. L'illusion de la coordination par le contrat," Post-Print halshs-00515194, HAL.
    4. Dorine Cornet & Jean Bonnet & Sébastien Bourdin, 2023. "Digital entrepreneurship indicator (DEI): an analysis of the case of the greater Paris metropolitan area," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(3), pages 697-724, December.
    5. Robert Boyer, 2007. "Growth strategies and poverty reduction: the institutional complementarity hypothesis," Working Papers halshs-00587703, HAL.
    6. Gilles Paché, 2020. "Inside Delivery Platforms: The Covid-19 Pandemic And After," Post-Print hal-03041080, HAL.
    7. Santana, Monica & Cobo, Manuel J., 2020. "What is the future of work? A science mapping analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 846-862.
    8. Fabien Jakob, 2022. "Collective action towards a greener order of worth: protecting a common cultural and natural heritage," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 32(1), pages 625-642, June.
    9. Thomas Amossé & Gaëtan Flocco & Josette Lefèvre & Jean-Marie Pernot & Héloïse Petit & Frédéric Rey & Michèle Tallard & Carole Tuchszirer & Catherine Vincent, 2012. "Les organisations patronales. Continuités et mutations des formes de représentation du patronat," Working Papers hal-00684075, HAL.
    10. Jean-Pierre Bréchet & Hélène Journé-Michel & Nathalie Schieb-Bienfait, 2008. "Figures de la conception et de l’innovation dans l’artisanat," Post-Print hal-01417042, HAL.
    11. Alfredo Monte & Sara Moccia & Luca Pennacchio, 2022. "Regional entrepreneurship and innovation: historical roots and the impact on the growth of regions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 451-473, January.
    12. Vitale, Tommaso Prof, 2024. "La contractualisation des services sociaux," SocArXiv m8fkp, Center for Open Science.
    13. Geissinger, Andrea & Laurell, Christofer & Sandström, Christian, 2020. "Digital Disruption beyond Uber and Airbnb—Tracking the long tail of the sharing economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Mitze, Timo & Strotebeck, Falk, 2017. "Modeling interregional research collaborations in German biotechnology using industry directory data: A quantitative social network analysis," MPRA Paper 83392, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Tuomas Ylä-Anttila & Eeva Luhtakallio, 2016. "Justifications Analysis: Understanding Moral Evaluations in Public Debates," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(4), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Isabela dos Santos Paes & Jean-Luc Moriceau & Géraldine Guérillot & Julien Billion, 2014. "Entrepreneur et salarié : parcours et identités dans le portage salarial," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-02394355, HAL.
    17. Carles Méndez-Ortega & Josep-Maria Arauzo-Carod, 2020. "Do software and video game firms share location patterns across cities? Evidence from Barcelona, Lyon and Hamburg," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 64(3), pages 641-666, June.
    18. Sibylle Bui & Ionara Costa & Olivier De Schutter & Tom Dedeurwaerdere & Marek Hudon & Marlene Feyereisen, 2019. "Systemic ethics and inclusive governance: two key prerequisites for sustainability transitions of agri-food systems," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 277-288, June.
    19. Helge Peukert, 2002. "Schumpeter'S "Lost" Seventh Chapter: A Critical Overview," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1-2), pages 79-89.
    20. Céline Bessière & Christophe Giraud & Nicolas Renahy, 2008. "Introduction - Famille, travail, école et agriculture," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 88(3), pages 5-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:11:p:2188-2206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.