IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v53y2016i10p2023-2040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The re-emergence of self-managed co-housing in Europe: A critical review of co-housing research

Author

Listed:
  • Lidewij Tummers

Abstract

This article reviews a decade of co-housing studies and publications, to identify major themes and research gaps. Generally, co-housing is seen as a promising model for urban development, and most empirical case studies report active and diverse communities, creating and maintaining affordable living environments. However, numbers are small and there is as yet no quantitative evidence to substantiate the claims. Nevertheless, important lessons can be drawn from co-housing as an integrated practice to meet today’s societal and environmental challenges. Rather than its utopian ambitions, the frictions with current institutional frameworks point the way to transform these into more adequate agents of development.

Suggested Citation

  • Lidewij Tummers, 2016. "The re-emergence of self-managed co-housing in Europe: A critical review of co-housing research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(10), pages 2023-2040, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:10:p:2023-2040
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098015586696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015586696
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098015586696?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabrina Bresson & Sylvette Denèfle, 2015. "Diversity of self-managed co-housing initiatives in France," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 5-16, March.
    2. Lydia Coudroy de Lille, 2015. "Housing cooperatives in Poland. The origins of a deadlock," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 17-31, March.
    3. Paul Chatterton, 2013. "Towards an Agenda for Post-carbon Cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK's First Ecological, Affordable Cohousing Community," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1654-1674, September.
    4. Christiane Droste, 2015. "German co-housing: an opportunity for municipalities to foster socially inclusive urban development?," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 79-92, March.
    5. Kath Scanlon & Melissa Fernández Arrigoitia, 2015. "Development of new cohousing: lessons from a London scheme for the over-50s," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 106-121, March.
    6. Heidrun Wankiewicz, 2015. "The potential of cohousing for rural Austria," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 46-63, March.
    7. Jung Shin Choi, 2004. "Evaluation of community planning and life of senior cohousing projects in northern European countries1," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(8), pages 1189-1216, December.
    8. Louise Meijering & Paulus Huigen & Bettina Van Hoven, 2007. "Intentional Communities In Rural Spaces," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 98(1), pages 42-52, February.
    9. Anne Labit, 2015. "Self-managed co-housing in the context of an ageing population in Europe," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 32-45, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pilar Monton & Luisa-Eugenia Reyes & Carlos-María Alcover, 2022. "Personal Characteristics for Successful Senior Cohousing: A Proposed Theoretical Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Piotr Lis & Zuzanna Rataj & Katarzyna Suszyńska, 2022. "Implementation Risk Factors of Collaborative Housing in Poland: The Case of ‘Nowe Żerniki’ in Wrocław," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Heli Zacharya & Avinoam Meir & Nurit Alfasi, 2022. "A Place Within a Place: Location Choice by Intentional Communities," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(5), pages 469-482, December.
    4. Aimee Felstead & Kevin Thwaites & James Simpson, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework for Urban Commoning in Shared Residential Landscapes in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Xiaoqing Zhu & Tiancheng Zhang & Weijun Gao & Danying Mei, 2020. "Analysis on Spatial Pattern and Driving Factors of Carbon Emission in Urban–Rural Fringe Mixed-Use Communities: Cases Study in East Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Angeliki Paidakaki & Richard Lang, 2021. "Uncovering Social Sustainability in Housing Systems through the Lens of Institutional Capital: A Study of Two Housing Alliances in Vienna, Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Jim Hudson & Kath Scanlon & Chihiro Udagawa & Melissa Fernández Arrigoitia & Mara Ferreri & Karen West, 2021. "‘A Slow Build-Up of a History of Kindness’: Exploring the Potential of Community-Led Housing in Alleviating Loneliness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Lenore Newman & Denver Nixon, 2014. "Farming in an Agriburban Ecovillage Development," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, December.
    9. Viktor Bukovszki & Gabriella Dóci & András Reith, 2021. "Coding Engines in Participatory Social Housing Design—A Case to Revisit Pattern Languages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    10. Andrew Williams & Mark Goodwin & Paul Cloke, 2014. "Neoliberalism, Big Society, and Progressive Localism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(12), pages 2798-2815, December.
    11. Ornella Iuorio & Andrew Wallace & Kate Simpson, 2019. "Prefabs in the North of England: Technological, Environmental and Social Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Pablo Newberry & Paul Harper & Thea Morgan, 2021. "Understanding the Market for Eco Self-Build Community Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-32, October.
    13. Chen-Yi Sun & Yen-An Chen & Xiuzhi Zhang, 2019. "Key Factors in the Success of Eco-Communities in Taiwan’s Countryside: The Role of Government, Partner, and Community Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, February.
    14. Sharifi, Ayyoob & Yamagata, Yoshiki, 2016. "Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1654-1677.
    15. Nazli Azergun, 2020. "Resource allocation at an income‐sharing community: An application of Elinor Ostrom's commons framework," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 367-384, October.
    16. Borgloh, Sarah & Westerheide, Peter, 2010. "Social return on investment of mutual support based housing projects: Potential for socio-economic cost savings and higher living quality," ZEW Discussion Papers 10-029, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Ciska Ulug & Elen-Maarja Trell & Lummina Horlings, 2021. "Ecovillage foodscapes: zooming in and out of sustainable food practices," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 1041-1059, December.
    18. Yong Tu, 2018. "Urban debates for climate change after the Kyoto Protocol," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(1), pages 3-18, January.
    19. Upham, Dr Paul & Sovacool, Prof Benjamin & Ghosh, Dr Bipashyee, 2022. "Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Lager Debbie & van Hoven Bettina & Meijering Louise, 2012. "Places that Matter: Place Attachment and Wellbeing of Older Antillean Migrants in the Netherlands," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 81-94, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:10:p:2023-2040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.