IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v46y2009i10p2213-2238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partnership Diversity and Governance Culture: Evidence from Urban Regeneration Policies in Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel Breda-Vázquez

    (Division of Environmental and Territorial Planning, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal, ivazquez@fe.up.pt)

  • Paulo Conceição

    (Division of Environmental and Territorial Planning, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal, psc@fe.up.pt)

  • Ruben Fernandes

    (CITTA-Research Centre for Territory, Transport and Environment, Division of Environmental and Territorial Planning, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal, rubenf@fe.up.pt)

Abstract

Debates on urban regeneration highlight the processes of mobilisation of public and private agents and the diversity of models of partnership. This paper focuses on the relationship between the diversity of partnerships and the processes of institutional change, and discusses the role played by governance culture. By looking at the case of Portugal, it explores a plurality of episodes of policy experimentation and actor—network practices. The results show that it is difficult to build general transformative processes when using specific innovative experiences as a basis. Sectoral institutional agendas and practices make it difficult to establish enduring processes of ‘cross-fertilisation’ for institutional and policy learning and innovation. Governance culture has a constraining influence. In such a context, the issue of the fragmentation of urban policy becomes crucial and the role of an urban policy that establishes the conditions in which innovation can occur seems to be particularly relevant.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel Breda-Vázquez & Paulo Conceição & Ruben Fernandes, 2009. "Partnership Diversity and Governance Culture: Evidence from Urban Regeneration Policies in Portugal," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(10), pages 2213-2238, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:46:y:2009:i:10:p:2213-2238
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098009339433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098009339433
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098009339433?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mike Geddes, 2000. "Tackling Social Exclusion in the European Union? The Limits to the New Orthodoxy of Local Partnership," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 782-800, December.
    2. Jonathan S. Davies, 2004. "Conjuncture or disjuncture? An institutionalist analysis of local regeneration partnerships in the UK," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 570-585, September.
    3. Uta Hohn & Birgit Neuer, 2006. "New urban governance: Institutional change and consequences for urban development," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 291-298, April.
    4. Iván Tosics & Thea Dukes, 2005. "Urban Development Programmes In The Context Of Public Administration And Urban Policy," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 96(4), pages 390-408, September.
    5. Carlos Nunes Silva & Stephen Syrett, 2006. "Governing Lisbon: Evolving Forms of City Governance," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 98-119, March.
    6. Enrico Gualini, 2006. "The rescaling of governance in Europe: New spatial and institutional rationales," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(7), pages 881-904, August.
    7. A Harding, 1991. "The Rise of Urban Growth Coalitions, UK-Style?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 9(3), pages 295-317, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gillian Bristow & Tom Entwistle & Frances Hines & Steve Martin, 2008. "New Spaces for Inclusion? Lessons from the ‘Three‐Thirds’ Partnerships in Wales," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 903-921, December.
    2. Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews & Matej Nikšič & Luka Mladenovič & Boštjan Cotič & Barbara Mušič & Boštjan Kerbler, 2024. "Ljubljana—European Green Capital 2016: From Strategic Spatial Planning to Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Lesley Hemphill & Stanley McGreal & Jim Berry & Siobhan Watson, 2006. "Leadership, Power and Multisector Urban Regeneration Partnerships," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(1), pages 59-80, January.
    4. Jesse Heley & Kate Moles, 2012. "Partnership working in regions: Reflections on local government collaboration in Wales," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 139-153, June.
    5. Ioannis Chorianopoulos & Theodoros Iosifides, 2006. "The Neoliberal Framework of EU Urban Policy in Action: Supporting Competitiveness and Reaping Disparities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(4), pages 409-422, November.
    6. Martin Franz & Orhan Güles & Gisela Prey, 2008. "Place‐Making And ‘Green’ Reuses Of Brownfields In The Ruhr," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 99(3), pages 316-328, July.
    7. Xiaobo Su, 2013. "From Frontier to Bridgehead: Cross-border Regions and the Experience of Yunnan, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1213-1232, July.
    8. Andrew M. Wood, 2004. "Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 2103-2118, October.
    9. Azam Safari & Zahra Hosseini, 2016. "The Effect of Workshop Training Method and Electronic Teaching Method on Mathematics Learning," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, ejms_v1_i.
    10. Ariel Mendez & Delphine Mercier, 2007. "Territorial Dynamics and History Imprint : Two french Clusters in Transition in the South East Region," Working Papers halshs-00360764, HAL.
    11. Antoine Grandclement & Guilhem Boulay, 2021. "From The Uneven De-Diversification Of Local Financial Resources To Planning Policies: The Residentialization Hypothesis," Post-Print halshs-03322259, HAL.
    12. Auziņš Armands & Viesturs Jānis, 2017. "A Values-Led Planning Approach for Sustainable Land Use and Development," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 275-286, November.
    13. Pallagst, Karina & Dörrenbächer, H. Peter & Weith, Thomas, 2022. "Theories of cross-border cooperation: Explanatory approaches from European integration, regionalism and governance," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: The future viability of cross-border cooperation, volume 33, pages 33-45, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    14. Efrat Eizenberg & Mor Shilon, 2016. "Pedagogy for the new planner: Refining the qualitative toolbox," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(6), pages 1118-1135, November.
    15. Vigar, Geoff & Shaw, Andrew & Swann, Richard, 2011. "Selling sustainable mobility: The reporting of the Manchester Transport Innovation Fund bid in UK media," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 468-479, March.
    16. Paul Lawless, 1994. "Partnership in Urban Regeneration in the UK: The Sheffield Central Area Study," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(8), pages 1303-1324, October.
    17. Philip Catney & John M Henneberry, 2016. "Public entrepreneurship and the politics of regeneration in multi-level governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(7), pages 1324-1343, November.
    18. Mark Sandford, 2020. "Conceptualising ‘generative power’: Evidence from the city-regions of England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(10), pages 2098-2114, August.
    19. R Imrie & H Thomas, 1993. "The Limits of Property-Led Regeneration," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 11(1), pages 87-102, March.
    20. Halima BEGUM & Golam MOINUDDIN, 2010. "Spatial Dimension Of Social Exclusion. An Imperial Investigation Into The Relationship Of Housing And Social Exclusion In The Slums Of Dhaka City," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2(3), pages 314-328, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:46:y:2009:i:10:p:2213-2238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.