IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3332-d1376635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ljubljana—European Green Capital 2016: From Strategic Spatial Planning to Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews

    (Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Trnovski Pristan 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Department of Law and Real Estate Management, European Faculty of Law, New University, Delpinova Ulica 18B, SI-5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia)

  • Matej Nikšič

    (Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Trnovski Pristan 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Luka Mladenovič

    (Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Trnovski Pristan 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Boštjan Cotič

    (Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Trnovski Pristan 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Barbara Mušič

    (Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Trnovski Pristan 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Boštjan Kerbler

    (Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Trnovski Pristan 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Department of Law and Real Estate Management, European Faculty of Law, New University, Delpinova Ulica 18B, SI-5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia)

Abstract

Ljubljana was the first post-socialist city awarded with the title European Green Capital. The title awarded by the European Commission is given to a city that is achieving high environmental standards, is setting ambitious goals for further environmental improvement and sustainable development, and can act as a role model to inspire other cities and promote best practices to all other European cities. The article is based on a hypothesis that at the moment when Ljubljana applied for (and was awarded) the European Green Capital title, it had strong strategic spatial planning and successful territorial governance, as well as the interweaving of both. To prove the hypothesis, the timetable and characteristics of the strategic spatial planning and territorial governance in Ljubljana are presented in this article and critically evaluated. Critical evaluation and analyses are also assessed using a qualitative research method, i.e., semi-structured in-depth interviews among experts from four professional fields including spatial planning, urbanism, architecture, and management. The results confirmed the hypothesis: Ljubljana’s sustainability-oriented strategic spatial plan prepared by a variety of stakeholders, experts, and citizens, as well as the effective governance system established by the mayor, a manager by profession, were two factors that coincided at a crucial moment. This was recognized by the European Commission and Ljubljana was awarded a prestigious title. Ljubljana can therefore serve as an excellent sustainable example for other post-socialist cities in terms of strategic spatial planning and governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews & Matej Nikšič & Luka Mladenovič & Boštjan Cotič & Barbara Mušič & Boštjan Kerbler, 2024. "Ljubljana—European Green Capital 2016: From Strategic Spatial Planning to Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3332-:d:1376635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3332/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3332/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrico Gualini, 2006. "The rescaling of governance in Europe: New spatial and institutional rationales," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(7), pages 881-904, August.
    2. Carlos Nunes Silva & Stephen Syrett, 2006. "Governing Lisbon: Evolving Forms of City Governance," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 98-119, March.
    3. Louis Albrechts, 2006. "Bridge the Gap: From Spatial Planning to Strategic Projects," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(10), pages 1487-1500, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isabel Breda-Vázquez & Paulo Conceição & Ruben Fernandes, 2009. "Partnership Diversity and Governance Culture: Evidence from Urban Regeneration Policies in Portugal," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(10), pages 2213-2238, September.
    2. Peter Newman, 2007. "Strategic Spatial Planning: Collective Action and Moments of Opportunity," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(10), pages 1371-1383, August.
    3. Ioannis Chorianopoulos & Theodoros Iosifides, 2006. "The Neoliberal Framework of EU Urban Policy in Action: Supporting Competitiveness and Reaping Disparities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(4), pages 409-422, November.
    4. Busscher, Tim & Tillema, Taede & Arts, Jos, 2015. "In search of sustainable road infrastructure planning: How can we build on historical policy shifts?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 42-51.
    5. Xiaobo Su, 2013. "From Frontier to Bridgehead: Cross-border Regions and the Experience of Yunnan, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1213-1232, July.
    6. Antoine Grandclement & Guilhem Boulay, 2021. "From The Uneven De-Diversification Of Local Financial Resources To Planning Policies: The Residentialization Hypothesis," Post-Print halshs-03322259, HAL.
    7. Auziņš Armands & Viesturs Jānis, 2017. "A Values-Led Planning Approach for Sustainable Land Use and Development," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 275-286, November.
    8. pablo ELINBAUM, 2014. "physical development planning for urban areas: the case of Rio Gallegos’ micro-region," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 27-43, February.
    9. Liu, Yansui & Zhou, Yang, 2021. "Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Pallagst, Karina & Dörrenbächer, H. Peter & Weith, Thomas, 2022. "Theories of cross-border cooperation: Explanatory approaches from European integration, regionalism and governance," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: The future viability of cross-border cooperation, volume 33, pages 33-45, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    11. Luigi Santopietro & Francesco Scorza, 2024. "Voluntary Planning and City Networks: A Systematic Bibliometric Review Addressing Current Issues for Sustainable and Climate-Responsive Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Timothy Dixon & David Adams, 2008. "Housing Supply and Brownfield Regeneration in a post-Barker World: Is There Enough Brownfield Land in England and Scotland?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(1), pages 115-139, January.
    13. Enrico Gualini & Carola Fricke, 2019. "‘Who governs’ Berlin’s metropolitan region? The strategic-relational construction of metropolitan scale in Berlin–Brandenburg’s economic development policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(1), pages 59-80, February.
    14. Suškevičs, M. & Eiter, S. & Martinat, S. & Stober, D. & Vollmer, E. & de Boer, C.L. & Buchecker, M., 2019. "Regional variation in public acceptance of wind energy development in Europe: What are the roles of planning procedures and participation?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 311-323.
    15. Antoine Grandclement & Guilhem Boulay, 2021. "From the uneven de-diversification of local financial resources to planning policies: The residentialization hypothesis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1454-1472, September.
    16. Nikita Sud, 2017. "State, scale and networks in the liberalisation of India’s land," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 76-93, February.
    17. Kotzebue, Julia R., 2022. "Integrated urban transport infrastructure development: The role of digital social geo-communication in Hamburg's TEN-T improvement," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    18. Vratislav Havlík, 2020. "Europeanization as the Reterritorialization of the State: Towards Conceptual Clarification," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1288-1306, September.
    19. Luca Salvati & Margherita Carlucci & Efstathios Grigoriadis & Francesco Maria Chelli, 2018. "Uneven dispersion or adaptive polycentrism? Urban expansion, population dynamics and employment growth in an ‘ordinary’ city," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 38(1), pages 1-25, February.
    20. Pallagst, Karina M. & Dörrenbächer, H. Peter & Weith, Thomas, 2018. "Grenzüberschreitende Kooperation theoretisch: Erklärungsansätze aus europäischer Integration, Regionalismus und Governance," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina M. & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: Zukunftsfähigkeit grenzüberschreitender Zusammenarbeit, volume 20, pages 28-40, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3332-:d:1376635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.