IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v41y2004i10p2043-2059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Broadband Internet Policies in Europe: A Critical Review

Author

Listed:
  • Willem van Winden

    (European Institute for Comparative Urban Research (Euricur), Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738 (room H12-33), 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands, vwinden@few.eur.nl)

  • Paulus Woets

    (European Institute for Comparative Urban Research (Euricur), Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738 (room H12-33), 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands, woets@few.eur.nl)

Abstract

For many reasons, cities and regions in Europe play an increasingly active role in providing and/or promoting broadband access to the Internet. This article describes and analyses local policy interventions in the broadband infrastructure market and presents a typology of four different kinds of policy. For each policy type, the cities' objectives and rationale for intervening in the broadband market are described. Subsequently, a critical analysis is made of the alleged benefits of broadband policies and the associated risks and costs are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Willem van Winden & Paulus Woets, 2004. "Urban Broadband Internet Policies in Europe: A Critical Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(10), pages 2043-2059, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:41:y:2004:i:10:p:2043-2059
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098042000256378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098042000256378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098042000256378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oecd, 2001. "The Development of Broadband Access in the OECD Countries," OECD Digital Economy Papers 56, OECD Publishing.
    2. Willem Van Winden, 2001. "The End of Social Exclusion? On Information Technology Policy as a Key to Social Inclusion in Large European Cities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(9), pages 861-877.
    3. Kridel, Donald J & Sappington, David E M & Weisman, Dennis L, 1996. "The Effects of Incentive Regulation in the Telecommunications Industry: A Survey," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 269-306, May.
    4. Atsushi Umino, 2002. "Broadband Infrastructure Deployment: The Role of Government Assistance," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2002/15, OECD Publishing.
    5. Fraquelli, Giovanni & Vannoni, Davide, 2000. "Multidimensional performance in telecommunications, regulation and competition: analysing the European major players," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 27-46, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Willem van Winden & Leo van den Berg & Peter Pol, 2007. "European Cities in the Knowledge Economy: Towards a Typology," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(3), pages 525-549, March.
    2. Turk, Tomaž & Trkman, Peter, 2012. "Bass model estimates for broadband diffusion in European countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 85-96.
    3. Jan Öhman, 2010. "Towards a Digital (Societal) Infrastructure?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(1), pages 183-195, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noel Uri, 2001. "Telecommunications in the United States and Changing Productive Efficiency," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 321-335, September.
    2. Filipe Campante & Ruben Durante & Francesco Sobbrio, 2018. "Politics 2.0: The Multifaceted Effect of Broadband Internet on Political Participation," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 1094-1136.
    3. Ronald Fischer & Pablo Serra, 2004. "Efectos de la privatización de servicios públicos en Chile: Casos sanitario, electricidad y telecomunicaciones (Effects of privatization on public services in Chile: The case of the sanitary, electric," Documentos de Trabajo 186, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
    4. António Madureira & Nico Baken & Harry Bouwman, 2011. "Value of digital information networks: a holonic framework," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-30, April.
    5. Martín Rossi, 2015. "Using Labor Productivity Change Estimates as an Input for X-Factors in Price-Cap Regulation," Working Papers 118, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised Feb 2015.
    6. Zhang, Wei & Boyle, Glenn & Howell, Bronwyn, 2008. "Catching-Up in Broadband Regressions: Does Local Loop Unbundling Policy Lead to Material Increases in OECD Broadband Uptake?," Working Paper Series 3991, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    7. Banerjee, Aniruddha, 2003. "Does incentive regulation 'cause' degradation of retail telephone service quality?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 243-269, June.
    8. Noel Uri, 2002. "Assessing the Effect of Incentive Regulation on Productive Efficiency in Telecommunications in the United States," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 113-127, March.
    9. Ilsoon Shin, 2006. "Adoption of Enterprise Application Software and Firm Performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 241-256, April.
    10. Yashuo Chen & Pengbo Li & Chunjiang Yang, 2020. "Examining the Effects of Overtime Work on Subjective Social Status and Social Inclusion in the Chinese Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Resende, Marcelo & Otavio Facanha, Luis, 2005. "Price-cap regulation and service-quality in telecommunications: an empirical study," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Howell, Bronwyn, 2008. "The Role of Price Structure in Telecommunications Technology Diffusion," Working Paper Series 4011, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    13. Colin Lindsay, 2005. "Employability, Services for Unemployed Job Seekers and the Digital Divide," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(2), pages 325-339, February.
    14. Uri, Noel D., 2003. "The adoption of incentive regulation and its effect on technical efficiency in telecommunications in the United States," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 21-34, October.
    15. Michael Hellwig & Dominik Schober & Luis Cabral, 2018. "Incentive Regulation: Evidence From German Electricity Networks," Working Papers 18-03, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    16. Galetovic, Alexander & Hogan, William W., 2008. "Comments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123320, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Park, Sang Yong & Kim, Jong Wook & Lee, Duk Hee, 2011. "Development of a market penetration forecasting model for Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles considering infrastructure and cost reduction effects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3307-3315, June.
    18. Howell, Bronwyn E. & Potgieter, Petrus H., 2020. "Politics, policy and fixed-line telecommunications provision: Insights from Australia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7).
    19. Uri, Noel D., 2000. "Price caps and the error in X-factor calculations," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 329-339, December.
    20. Bitran, Eduardo & Serra, Pablo, 1998. "Regulation of privatized utilities: The Chilean experience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 945-962, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:41:y:2004:i:10:p:2043-2059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.