IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v44y2020i7s0308596120300914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics, policy and fixed-line telecommunications provision: Insights from Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Howell, Bronwyn E.
  • Potgieter, Petrus H.

Abstract

Over the past 40 years, telecommunications policy worldwide has been dominated by the privatisation of former government-owned firms, the pursuit of increasing competition as well as the delegation of day-to-day operations of industry decision-making and oversight from core governments to autonomous regulators sitting at arms-length from political decision-making. One of the most (apparently) dramatic reversals of this trend has occurred in Australia where the federal government has set up a state-owned company (NBN Co) to fully replace and upgrade the fixed-line infrastructure for voice and broadband communications for the entire country. Some argued that the NBN heralded a reversal of a “failed, neoliberal” deregulation and pro-competition policy agenda in Australia, and a return to “social democratic” values. The NBN has attracted interest as a possible model for other governments looking to fund broadband infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Howell, Bronwyn E. & Potgieter, Petrus H., 2020. "Politics, policy and fixed-line telecommunications provision: Insights from Australia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:44:y:2020:i:7:s0308596120300914
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596120300914
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oecd, 2001. "The Development of Broadband Access in the OECD Countries," OECD Digital Economy Papers 56, OECD Publishing.
    2. Cave, Martin, 0. "Encouraging infrastructure competition via the ladder of investment," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3-4), pages 223-237, April.
    3. de Streel, Alexandre, 2008. "Current and future European regulation of electronic communications: A critical assessment," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 722-734, December.
    4. Bronwyn Howell, 2010. "Politics And The Pursuit Of Telecommunications Sector Efficiency In New Zealand," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 253-276.
    5. Given, Jock, 2010. "Take your partners: Public private interplay in Australian and New Zealand plans for next generation broadband," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 540-549, October.
    6. Geoff Edwards & Leonard Waverman, 2006. "The Effects of Public Ownership and Regulatory Independence on Regulatory Outcomes," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 23-67, January.
    7. Howell, Bronwyn & Sadowski, Bert, 2018. "Anatomy of a public-private partnership: Hold-up and regulatory commitment in Ultrafast Broadband," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(7), pages 552-565.
    8. Bernardo Bortolotti & Carlo Cambini & Laura Rondi & Yossi Spiegel, 2011. "Capital Structure and Regulation: Do Ownership and Regulatory Independence Matter?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 517-564, June.
    9. Frieden, Rob, 2005. "Lessons from broadband development in Canada, Japan, Korea and the United States," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 595-613, September.
    10. Heatley, David & Howell, Bronwyn, 2010. "Structural Separation and Prospects for Welfare-Enhancing Price Discrimination in a New 'Natural Monopoly' Network: comparing fibre broadband proposals in Australia and New Zealand," Working Paper Series 4056, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    11. Cave, Martin & Martin, Ian, 2010. "Motives and means for public investment in nationwide next generation networks," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 505-512, October.
    12. Bourreau, Marc & Cambini, Carlo & Hoernig, Steffen, 2012. "Ex ante regulation and co-investment in the transition to next generation access," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 399-406.
    13. Jerry A. Hausman & William E. Taylor, 2012. "Telecommunications Deregulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(3), pages 386-390, May.
    14. Huigen, Jos & Cave, Martin, 2008. "Regulation and the promotion of investment in next generation networks--A European dilemma," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 713-721, December.
    15. Harvey, David, 2007. "A Brief History of Neoliberalism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199283279.
    16. Angela Garcia Calvo, 2012. "Universal Service Policies in the Context of National Broadband Plans," OECD Digital Economy Papers 203, OECD Publishing.
    17. Bronwyn Howell, 2007. "Pendulous progress 20 years of NZ telcoms regulation," Competition & Regulation Times 371305, New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    18. Taylor Reynolds, 2009. "The Role of Communication Infrastructure Investment in Economic Recovery," OECD Digital Economy Papers 154, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Howell, Bronwyn E. & Potgieter, Petrus H., 2022. "Effective competition and ineffective mobile industry regulation in South Africa," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7).
    2. Howell, Bronwyn E. & Potgieter, Petrus H., 2021. "Spectrum shortage and merger by any other name in South Africa," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238027, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. Sinclair, Andrew, 2023. "Assessing the benefits of high-speed broadband: Lessons from Australia's National Broadband Network (NBN)," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Howell, Bronwyn, 2012. "Competition and Regulation Policy in Antipodean Government-Funded UltraFast Fibre Broadband Markets," Working Paper Series 2787, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    2. Howell, Bronwyn, 2012. "Competition and Regulation Policy in Antipodean Government-Funded UltraFast Fibre Broadband Markets," Working Paper Series 4133, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    3. Howell, Bronwyn, 2011. "Competition and Regulation Policy in Antipodean Government-Funded Ultrafast Broadband Network Markets," Working Paper Series 4099, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    4. Howell, Bronwyn, 2012. "Competition and Regulation Policy in Antipodean Government-Funded UltraFast Fibre Broadband Markets," Working Paper Series 18774, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    5. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19206 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Howell, Bronwyn, 2011. "Competition and Regulation Policy in Antipodean Government-Funded Ultrafast Broadband Network Markets," Working Paper Series 19206, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    7. Howell, Bronwyn, 2012. "Competition and Regulation Policy in Antipodean Government-Funded UltraFast Fibre Broadband Markets," Working Paper Series 19242, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    8. repec:vuw:vuwscr:18774 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19242 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Ganuza, Juan José & Viecens, María Fernanda, 2011. "Deployment of high-speed broadband infrastructures during the economic crisis. The case of Xarxa Oberta," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 857-870.
    11. Howell, Bronwyn & Sadowski, Bert, 2014. "Anatomy of a Public-Private Partnership: Hold-up and regulatory risk in an NGN PPP," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106872, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    12. Howell, Bronwyn & Sadowski, Bert, 2018. "Anatomy of a public-private partnership: Hold-up and regulatory commitment in Ultrafast Broadband," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(7), pages 552-565.
    13. Garrone, Paola & Zaccagnino, Michele, 2015. "Seeking the links between competition and telecommunications investments," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 388-405.
    14. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19314 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Briglauer Wolfgang & Frübing Stefan & Vogelsang Ingo, 2014. "The Impact of Alternative Public Policies on the Deployment of New Communications Infrastructure – A Survey," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 227-270, September.
    16. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Holzleitner, Christian, 2014. "Efficient contracts for government intervention in promoting next generation communications networks," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-022, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Howell, Bronwyn, 2014. "Structural Separation and Technological Diffusion," Working Paper Series 4353, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    18. Howell, Bronwyn, 2013. "Broadband regulation and government investment in nationwide ultra fast fribre broadband networks: Evidence from New Zealand," 24th European Regional ITS Conference, Florence 2013 88469, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    19. Howell, Bronwyn, 2014. "Structural Separation and Technological Diffusion," Working Paper Series 19314, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    20. Ruhle, Ernst-Olav & Brusic, Igor & Kittl, Jörg & Ehrler, Matthias, 2011. "Next Generation Access (NGA) supply side interventions—An international comparison," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 794-803.
    21. Ragoobar, Tricia & Whalley, Jason & Harle, David, 2011. "Public and private intervention for next-generation access deployment: Possibilities for three European countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 827-841.
    22. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Gugler, Klaus, 2013. "The deployment and penetration of high-speed fiber networks and services: Why are EU member states lagging behind?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 819-835.
    23. Tselekounis, Markos & Varoutas, Dimitris & Martakos, Drakoulis, 2014. "A CDS approach to induce facilities-based competition over NGA networks," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 311-331.
    24. Howell, Bronwyn, 2014. "Separation anxieties: Structural separation and technological diffusion in nascent fibre networks," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106840, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:44:y:2020:i:7:s0308596120300914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.