IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v37y2000i3p481-495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Economic Extensions of Central-place Theory Involving Profit Maximisation

Author

Listed:
  • Toshiharu Ishikawa

    (Faculty of Economics, Chuo University, Higashinakano 742-1, Tokyo 192-0393, Japan, ishiy@tamacc.chuo-u.ac.jp)

  • Masao Toda

    (College of International Studies, Chubu University, Kasugai, Aichi 487-8501, Japan, todam@isc.chubu.ac.jp)

Abstract

This paper attempts to extend central-place theory in terms of economic analysis, while at the same time refining and enhancing its applicability to urban systems. After reviewing the approach of Christaller, a central-place system is constructed, based on profit maximisation, and it is demonstrated that firms tend to concentrate at the largest central place. Next, the economic rationale for triangular market areas is discussed, and a central-place system is derived which involves the combination of triangular and hexagonal market areas. This model is used to explain the observed number of central places. Finally, the integration or separation of production and sales facilities is incorporated into the theory, as an attempt to explain the diversity of central places within an urban system.

Suggested Citation

  • Toshiharu Ishikawa & Masao Toda, 2000. "Some Economic Extensions of Central-place Theory Involving Profit Maximisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 481-495, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:37:y:2000:i:3:p:481-495
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098002078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098002078
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098002078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Greenhut & H. Ohta, 1973. "Spatial configurations and competitive equilibrium," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 109(1), pages 87-104, March.
    2. J. Tinbergen, 1968. "The Hierarcity Model Of The Size Distribution Of Centres," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 65-68, January.
    3. Suh, Seoung Hwan, 1991. "The optimal size distribution of cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 182-191, September.
    4. Capozza, Dennis R & Van Order, Robert, 1978. "A Generalized Model of Spatial Competition," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 68(5), pages 896-908, December.
    5. Toshiharu Ishikawa & Masao Toda, 1995. "An Unequal Spatial Structure of Location and Price with Consumer Density," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 71(2), pages 167-178, June.
    6. Edgar M. Hoover, 1970. "Transport Costs And The Spacing Of Central Places," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 255-274, April.
    7. Barclay G. Jones & Blane D. Lewis, 1990. "The Four Basic Properties Of Rank‐Size Hierarchical Distributions: Their Characteristics And Interrelationships," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(1), pages 83-95, January.
    8. Edwin S. Mills & Michael R. Lav, 1964. "A Model of Market Areas with Free Entry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(3), pages 278-278.
    9. Ishikawa, Toshiharu & Toda, Masao, 1990. "Spatial Configurations, Competition and Welfare," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Toshiharu ISHIKAWA, 2009. "Determination of a Factory's Location in a Large Geographical Area by Using Chaotic Phenomena and Retailers' Location Networks," Timisoara Journal of Economics, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 2(3(7)), pages 141-150.
    2. Toshiharu Ishikawa, 2011. "Firm's location choices by referring to chaotic phenomenon and the central place system," ERSA conference papers ersa10p102, European Regional Science Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toshiharu Ishikawa & Masao Toda, 1998. "An Application of the Frontier Price Concept in Spatial Equilibrium Analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(8), pages 1345-1358, July.
    2. Ishikawa, Toshiharu & Toda, Masao, 2005. "Retail market structure and the threat by the manufacturer to sell goods directly to the consumer," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 43-55, March.
    3. Biing‐Shiunn Yang & Chao‐Cheng Mai, 2009. "Löschian competition under demand uncertainty," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(4), pages 765-784, November.
    4. Toshiharu Ishikawa & Masao Toda, 1995. "An Unequal Spatial Structure of Location and Price with Consumer Density," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 71(2), pages 167-178, June.
    5. Toshiharu Ishikawa, 2010. "Effects of retail market structure and production conditions on firm’s location selections of fragmented production process," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 30(2), pages 91-103, September.
    6. Toshiharu Ishikawa, 2011. "Firm's location choices by referring to chaotic phenomenon and the central place system," ERSA conference papers ersa10p102, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Toshiharu ISHIKAWA, 2009. "Determination of a Factory's Location in a Large Geographical Area by Using Chaotic Phenomena and Retailers' Location Networks," Timisoara Journal of Economics, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 2(3(7)), pages 141-150.
    8. Boris Hirsch & Marion König & Joachim Möller, 2013. "Is There a Gap in the Gap? Regional Differences in the Gender Pay Gap," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 60(4), pages 412-439, September.
    9. Andrea Amelio & Sara Biancini, 2010. "Alternating Monopoly And Tacit Collusion," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 402-423, June.
    10. Stewart, Hayden & Dong, Diansheng, 2011. "Variation in retail costs for fresh vegetables and salty snacks across communities in the United States," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 128-135, April.
    11. Stewart, Hayden & Davis, David E., 2005. "Price Dispersion and Accessibility: A Case study of Fast Food," MPRA Paper 7617, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Heijnen, Pim & Soetevent, Adriaan R., 2018. "Price competition on graphs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 161-179.
    13. Carballo, Jeronimo & Ottaviano, Gianmarco I.P. & Volpe Martincus, Christian, 2018. "The buyer margins of firms' exports," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 33-49.
    14. Bröcker, Johannes, 1998. "Welfare effects of a transport subsidy in a spatial price equilibrium," Discussion Papers 3/98, Technische Universität Dresden, "Friedrich List" Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, Institute of Transport and Economics.
    15. Gordon F. Mulligan, 1984. "Agglomeration and Central Place Theory: A Review of the Literature," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 1-42, September.
    16. N. G. Dzhurka, 2024. "Interregional Economic Interactions in Light of the Central Place Theory," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 126-142, June.
    17. Farhad Dehghan & Guillermo Vargas Uribe, 1999. "Analysing Mexican Population Concentration: A Model with Empirical Evidence," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(8), pages 1269-1281, July.
    18. Kerem Yavuz Arslani & Christopher Hannum & Wendy Usrey & Laurie Dufloth, 2018. "A Spatial Model for Market Concentration Measure," ERES eres2018_164, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    19. Helge Sanner, 2009. "Economy vs. history," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 43(2), pages 283-306, June.
    20. Schuetz, Jenny, 2015. "Why are Walmart and Target Next-Door neighbors?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 38-48.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:37:y:2000:i:3:p:481-495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.