IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/1990010108000010901.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public service applications of the central place structure of western Guatemala

Author

Listed:
  • Vandenbroucke, David A.

Abstract

This is an examination of the locational efficiency of the placement of public service facilities in a system of central places. The system studied is centered on the city of Quetzaltenango, in the western highlands of Guatemala. The study proceeds outward from that city, tracing links to other places until these are exhausted. The set of places thus identified are the members of the Quetzaltenango system;The essential principle used is that the rarity of facilities supplying central goods is directly related to those goods' central place levels. This principle is employed by using cluster analysis to sort the places into a hierarchical set of classes. Those places which supply only the most nearly ubiquitous goods are assigned to lower levels of the central place hierarchy. This hierarchy of places simultaneously defines the hierarchy of goods, since higher-level goods are only offered at higher-level places. A discriminant function is estimated which uses the hierarchy of goods to predict the hierarchy of places. Misclassified places are detected by this function, and marginal adjustments are made to the "rough cut" produced by the cluster analysis;After the structure is defined, market areas are approximated by drawing perpendicular bisecting lines between neighboring places of each central place level. Lower-level places are assigned to neighboring centers so as to minimize distances, taking into account the road network where possible. The different levels of markets are examined to determine their geographical extent and the size of the populations served. Differences among subregions are identified and explained;Finally, the geographical distribution of the educational and health facilities are examined and evaluated in a central place context. An attempt is made to assign each type of facility to a central place level. The tributary places are recorded and compared with the central place structure. Attempts are made to estimate the populations served and the efficiency of facility location;The most striking characteristic of the health and educational systems in the study region is their extreme scarcity. The number and size of existing facilities is too small for any gain in efficiency from locational changes to have much of an impact. However, the problems of inadequate health care and schooling are exacerbated by locational inefficiencies. Facility location and user travel are overly influenced by the political hierarchy of departamento and municipio capitals. More careful attention to the central place structure would increase accessibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Vandenbroucke, David A., 1990. "Public service applications of the central place structure of western Guatemala," ISU General Staff Papers 1990010108000010901, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:1990010108000010901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/73f27e3f-0a12-491e-96b1-67bc6ac8754b/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edwin S. Mills & Michael R. Lav, 1964. "A Model of Market Areas with Free Entry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(3), pages 278-278.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biing‐Shiunn Yang & Chao‐Cheng Mai, 2009. "Löschian competition under demand uncertainty," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(4), pages 765-784, November.
    2. Heijnen, Pim & Soetevent, Adriaan R., 2018. "Price competition on graphs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 161-179.
    3. Gordon F. Mulligan, 1984. "Agglomeration and Central Place Theory: A Review of the Literature," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 1-42, September.
    4. Farhad Dehghan & Guillermo Vargas Uribe, 1999. "Analysing Mexican Population Concentration: A Model with Empirical Evidence," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(8), pages 1269-1281, July.
    5. Toshiharu Ishikawa & Masao Toda, 2000. "Some Economic Extensions of Central-place Theory Involving Profit Maximisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 481-495, March.
    6. Kerem Yavuz Arslani & Christopher Hannum & Wendy Usrey & Laurie Dufloth, 2018. "A Spatial Model for Market Concentration Measure," ERES eres2018_164, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    7. Babanov, A. & Ketter, W. & Gini, M., 2008. "An Evolutionary Framework for Determining Heterogeneous Strategies in Multi-Agent Marketplaces," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-002-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Toshiharu Ishikawa, 2011. "Firm's location choices by referring to chaotic phenomenon and the central place system," ERSA conference papers ersa10p102, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Toshiharu Ishikawa & Masao Toda, 1998. "An Application of the Frontier Price Concept in Spatial Equilibrium Analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(8), pages 1345-1358, July.
    10. Gershon Alperovich, 1993. "An Explanatory Model of City-size Distribution: Evidence from Cross-country Data," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(9), pages 1591-1601, November.
    11. Harvey S. Perloff, 1973. "The Development of Urban Economics in the United States," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 289-301, October.
    12. Daisuke Nakamura, 2010. "Spatial competition and consumer exclusion: social welfare perspectives in central-place system," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 101-110, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:1990010108000010901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.