IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v22y2016i3p367-382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strikes in the public sector in Denmark – assessing the economic gains and losses of collective action

Author

Listed:
  • Steen Scheuer

    (Department of Marketing and Management, University of Southern Denmark, Slagelse, Denmark)

  • Flemming Ibsen

    (Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark)

  • Laust Høgedahl

    (Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark)

Abstract

This article looks at strikes by employees in the public sector, discusses the theoretical background to these conflicts and shows – based on a case study of three strikes in the Danish public sector – how different union strategies lead to very different outcomes in terms of economic gains and losses, ranging from a slightly positive result to a negative result from which it will take eight to ten years to recover. This is of great importance because the challenge facing public sector unions is different from that of their counterparts: private sector unions struggle with the owners of capital, while public sector unions trying to move up the wage hierarchy cannot expect much help from fellow public sector unions, often quite the reverse.

Suggested Citation

  • Steen Scheuer & Flemming Ibsen & Laust Høgedahl, 2016. "Strikes in the public sector in Denmark – assessing the economic gains and losses of collective action," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(3), pages 367-382, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:22:y:2016:i:3:p:367-382
    DOI: 10.1177/1024258916655709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258916655709
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1024258916655709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Peters, 2012. "Neoliberal convergence in North America and Western Europe: Fiscal austerity, privatization, and public sector reform," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 208-235.
    2. Lorenzo Bordogna & Gian Primo Cella, 2002. "Decline or transformation? Change in industrial conflict and its challenges," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 8(4), pages 585-607, November.
    3. Stamhus, Jørgen & Scheuer, Steen & Christensen, Ellen Susanne, 2009. "Tre strejker i det offentlige – en komparativ lønmodtager-investeringsanalyse," Nationaløkonomisk tidsskrift, Nationaløkonomisk Forening, vol. 2009(1), pages 358-372.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nana Wesley Hansen & Nick Krachler, 2024. "Conditions for cross-professional union coalition-building: When enough is enough, but solidarity also has its limits!," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(2), pages 530-555, May.
    2. Kurt Vandaele, 2021. "Applauded ‘nightingales’ voicing discontent. Exploring labour unrest in health and social care in Europe before and since the COVID-19 pandemic," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(3), pages 399-411, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria da Paz Campos Lima & Antonio Martín Artiles, 2013. "Youth voice(s) in EU countries and social movements in southern Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(3), pages 345-364, August.
    2. Ulrike Weske & Peter Leisink & Eva Knies, 2014. "Local government austerity policies in the Netherlands: the effectiveness of social dialogue in preserving public service employment," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 403-416, August.
    3. Bjarke Refslund & Karen Jaehrling & Mathew Johnson & Aristea Koukiadaki & Trine Pernille Larsen & Christin Stiehm, 2020. "Moving In and Out of the Shadow of European Case Law: the Dynamics of Public Procurement in the Post‐Post‐Rüffert Era," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1165-1181, September.
    4. Fabio Monteduro, 2014. "Public–private versus public ownership and economic performance: evidence from Italian local utilities," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(1), pages 29-49, February.
    5. Francesca Degiuli, 2022. "Shaping Long‐term Care for Older Adults: Exploring the Role of Geriatricians in Italy and the United States," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 79-109, September.
    6. Heiner Dribbusch, 2016. "Organizing through conflict: exploring the relationship between strikes and union membership in Germany," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(3), pages 347-365, August.
    7. Olding, Michelle & Boyd, Jade & Kerr, Thomas & McNeil, Ryan, 2021. "“And we just have to keep going”: Task shifting and the production of burnout among overdose response workers with lived experience," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    8. Hayton, John W., 2016. "Plotting the motivation of student volunteers in sports-based outreach work in the North East of England," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 563-577.
    9. Kurt Vandaele, 2016. "Interpreting strike activity in western Europe in the past 20 years: the labour repertoire under pressure," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(3), pages 277-294, August.
    10. Francesca Di Pillo & Nathan Levialdi & Laura Marchegiani, 2020. "The Investments in Energy Distribution Networks: Does Company Ownership Matter?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 41-49.
    11. Lacey-Barnacle, M. & Smith, A. & Foxon, T.J., 2023. "Community wealth building in an age of just transitions: Exploring civil society approaches to net zero and future research synergies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    12. Yunji Kim & Austin M Aldag & Mildred E Warner, 2021. "Blocking the progressive city: How state pre-emptions undermine labour rights in the USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1158-1175, May.
    13. Jesper Hamark, 2022. "Strikes and lockouts: The need to separate labour conflicts," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(4), pages 1891-1910, November.
    14. Oscar Molina & Oriol Barranco, 2016. "Trade union strategies to enhance strike effectiveness in Italy and Spain," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(3), pages 383-399, August.
    15. Giorgos Gouzoulis, 2023. "What do indebted employees do? Financialisation and the decline of industrial action," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 71-94, January.
    16. Jan Wynen & Bjorn Kleizen, 2019. "Improving dynamics or destroying human capital? The nexus between excess turnover and performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 303-325, April.
    17. Karen Jaehrling & Mathew Johnson & Trine P Larsen & Bjarke Refslund & Damian Grimshaw, 2018. "Tackling Precarious Work in Public Supply Chains: A Comparison of Local Government Procurement Policies in Denmark, Germany and the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(3), pages 546-563, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:22:y:2016:i:3:p:367-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.