IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v32y2003i2p253-287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Analysis of Longitudinal Network Data With Changing Composition

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Huisman
  • Tom A. B. Snijders

Abstract

Markov chains can be used for the modeling of complex longitudinal network data. One class of probability models to model the evolution of social networks are stochastic actor-oriented models for network change proposed by Snijders. These models are continuous-time Markov chain models that are implemented as simulation models. The authors propose an extension of the simulation algorithm of stochastic actor-oriented models to include networks of changing composition. In empirical research, the composition of networks may change due to actors joining or leaving the network at some point in time. The composition changes are modeled as exogenous events that occur at given time points and are implemented in the simulation algorithm. The estimation of the network effects, as well as the effects of actor and dyadic attributes that influence the evolution of the network, is based on the simulation of Markov chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Huisman & Tom A. B. Snijders, 2003. "Statistical Analysis of Longitudinal Network Data With Changing Composition," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 32(2), pages 253-287, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:32:y:2003:i:2:p:253-287
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124103256096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124103256096
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124103256096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerhard G. Van De Bunt & Marijtje A.J. Van Duijn & Tom A.B. Snijders, 1999. "Friendship Networks Through Time: An Actor-Oriented Dynamic Statistical Network Model," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 167-192, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lopaciuk-Gonczaryk, Beata, 2019. "Social Capital Formation Through a Polish LETS: Challenging the Presumed Merits of Local Currencies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 75-87.
    2. Mary F. McGuire, 2014. "Pancreatic Cancer: Insights from Counterterrorism Theories," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 265-276, December.
    3. Elynn Y. Chen & Rong Chen, 2019. "Modeling Dynamic Transport Network with Matrix Factor Models: with an Application to International Trade Flow," Papers 1901.00769, arXiv.org.
    4. Johnson, Jeffrey C. & Luczkovich, Joseph J. & Borgatti, Stephen P. & Snijders, Tom A.B., 2009. "Using social network analysis tools in ecology: Markov process transition models applied to the seasonal trophic network dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3133-3140.
    5. de la Haye, Kayla & Robins, Garry & Mohr, Philip & Wilson, Carlene, 2011. "How physical activity shapes, and is shaped by, adolescent friendships," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(5), pages 719-728, September.
    6. Mercken, Liesbeth & Snijders, Tom A.B. & Steglich, Christian & de Vries, Hein, 2009. "Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: Social network analyses in six European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1506-1514, November.
    7. Antonio Zinilli, 2016. "Competitive project funding and dynamic complex networks: evidence from Projects of National Interest (PRIN)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(2), pages 633-652, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hideki Fujiyama, 2020. "Network centrality, social loops, and utility maximization," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 39-70, January.
    2. Sofia Dokuka & Diliara Valeeva, 2015. "Statistical Models for Analysis of Social Network Dynamics in Educational Studies," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 201-213.
    3. Neil Hwang & Jiarui Xu & Shirshendu Chatterjee & Sharmodeep Bhattacharyya, 2022. "The Bethe Hessian and Information Theoretic Approaches for Online Change-Point Detection in Network Data," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 283-320, June.
    4. Mary-Anne Holfve-Sabel, 2015. "Students’ Individual Choices of Peers to Work with During Lessons May Counteract Segregation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 577-594, June.
    5. Dekker, D.J. & Franses, Ph.H.B.F. & Krackhardt, D., 2001. "An Equilibrium-Correction Model for Dynamic Network Data," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-39-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Shahadat Uddin & Arif Khan & Liaquat Hossain & Mahendra Piraveenan & Sven Carlsson, 2015. "A topological framework to explore longitudinal social networks," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 48-68, March.
    7. Joshua Lospinoso & Michael Schweinberger & Tom Snijders & Ruth Ripley, 2011. "Assessing and accounting for time heterogeneity in stochastic actor oriented models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 5(2), pages 147-176, July.
    8. Maurits C. de Klepper & Giuseppe (Joe) Labianca & Ed Sleebos & Filip Agneessens, 2017. "Sociometric Status and Peer Control Attempts: A Multiple Status Hierarchies Approach," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 1-31, January.
    9. Prasanta Bhattacharya & Tuan Q. Phan & Xue Bai & Edoardo M. Airoldi, 2019. "A Coevolution Model of Network Structure and User Behavior: The Case of Content Generation in Online Social Networks," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 117-132, March.
    10. Karen Haandrikman & Leo J. G. Wissen, 2012. "Explaining the Flight of Cupid’s Arrow: A Spatial Random Utility Model of Partner Choice," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 28(4), pages 417-439, November.
    11. Siegwart Lindenberg, 2000. "It Takes Both Trust and Lack of Mistrust: The Workings of Cooperation and Relational Signaling in Contractual Relationships," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 4(1), pages 11-33, March.
    12. Buchmann, Tobias & Hain, Daniel & Kudic, Muhamed & Müller, Matthias, 2014. "Exploring the Evolution of Innovation Networks in Science-driven and Scale-intensive Industries: New Evidence from a Stochastic Actor-based Approach," IWH Discussion Papers 1/2014, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    13. Mercken, Liesbeth & Snijders, Tom A.B. & Steglich, Christian & de Vries, Hein, 2009. "Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: Social network analyses in six European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1506-1514, November.
    14. Pink, Sebastian & Kretschmer, David & Leszczensky, Lars, 2020. "Choice modelling in social networks using stochastic actor-oriented models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    15. Long, Emily & Gardani, Maria & McCann, Mark & Sweeting, Helen & Tranmer, Mark & Moore, Laurence, 2020. "Mental health disorders and adolescent peer relationships," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    16. Schweinberger, Michael & Snijders, Tom A.B., 2007. "Markov models for digraph panel data: Monte Carlo-based derivative estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4465-4483, May.
    17. Devari, Aashwinikumar & Nikolaev, Alexander G. & He, Qing, 2017. "Crowdsourcing the last mile delivery of online orders by exploiting the social networks of retail store customers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 105-122.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:32:y:2003:i:2:p:253-287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.