IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v220y2009i22p3133-3140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using social network analysis tools in ecology: Markov process transition models applied to the seasonal trophic network dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson, Jeffrey C.
  • Luczkovich, Joseph J.
  • Borgatti, Stephen P.
  • Snijders, Tom A.B.

Abstract

Ecosystem components interact in complex ways and change over time due to a variety of both internal and external influences (climate change, season cycles, human impacts). Such processes need to be modeled dynamically using appropriate statistical methods for assessing change in network structure. Here we use visualizations and statistical models of network dynamics to understand seasonal changes in the trophic network model described by Baird and Ulanowicz [Baird, D., Ulanowicz, R.E., 1989. Seasonal dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 501 (59), 329–364] for the Chesapeake Bay (USA). Visualizations of carbon flow networks were created for each season by using a network graphic analysis tool (NETDRAW). The structural relations of the pelagic and benthic compartments (nodes) in each seasonal network were displayed in a two-dimensional space using spring-embedder analyses with nodes color-coded for habitat associations (benthic or pelagic). The most complex network was summer, when pelagic species such as sea nettles, larval fishes, and carnivorous fishes immigrate into Chesapeake Bay and consume prey largely from the plankton and to some extent the benthos. Winter was the simplest of the seasonal networks, and exhibited the highest ascendency, with fewest nodes present and with most of the flows shifting to the benthic bacteria and sediment POC compartments. This shift in system complexity corresponds with a shift from a pelagic- to benthic-dominated system over the seasonal cycle, suggesting that winter is a mostly closed system, relying on internal cycling rather than external input. Network visualization tools are useful in assessing temporal and spatial changes in food web networks, which can be explored for patterns that can be tested using statistical approaches. A simulation-based continuous-time Markov Chain model called SIENA was used to determine the dynamic structural changes in the trophic network across phases of the annual cycle in a statistical as opposed to a visual assessment. There was a significant decrease in outdegree (prey nodes with reduced link density) and an increase in the number of transitive triples (a triad in which i chooses j and h, and j also chooses h, mostly connected via the non-living detritus nodes in position i), suggesting the Chesapeake Bay is a simpler, but structurally more efficient, ecosystem in the winter than in the summer. As in the visual analysis, this shift in system complexity corresponds with a shift from a pelagic to a more benthic-dominated system from summer to winter. Both the SIENA model and the visualization in NETDRAW support the conclusions of Baird and Ulanowicz [Baird, D., Ulanowicz, R.E., 1989. Seasonal dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 501 (59), 329–364] that there was an increase in the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem's ascendancy in the winter. We explain such reduced complexity in winter as a system response to lowered temperature and decreased solar energy input, which causes a decline in the production of new carbon, forcing nodes to go extinct; this causes a change in the structure of the system, making it simpler and more efficient than in summer. It appears that the seasonal dynamics of the trophic structure of Chesapeake Bay can be modeled effectively using the SIENA statistical model for network change.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson, Jeffrey C. & Luczkovich, Joseph J. & Borgatti, Stephen P. & Snijders, Tom A.B., 2009. "Using social network analysis tools in ecology: Markov process transition models applied to the seasonal trophic network dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3133-3140.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:22:p:3133-3140
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380009004414
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Huisman & Tom A. B. Snijders, 2003. "Statistical Analysis of Longitudinal Network Data With Changing Composition," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 32(2), pages 253-287, November.
    2. Richard J. Williams & Neo D. Martinez, 2000. "Simple rules yield complex food webs," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6774), pages 180-183, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Finger, Karl & Lux, Thomas, 2014. "Friendship between banks: An application of an actor-oriented model of network formation on interbank credit relations," Kiel Working Papers 1916, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Finger, Karl & Lux, Thomas, 2014. "Friendship Between Banks: An Application of an Actor-Oriented Model of Network Formation on Interbank Credit Relations," FinMaP-Working Papers 1, Collaborative EU Project FinMaP - Financial Distortions and Macroeconomic Performance: Expectations, Constraints and Interaction of Agents.
    3. Karl Finger & Thomas Lux, 2014. "Friendship Between Banks: An Application of an Actor-Oriented Model of Network Formation on Interbank Credit Relations," Working Papers 01, Chair of Monetary Economics and International Finance, Department of Economics, Kiel University.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, He & Yang, Bo & Hu, Xiaoming, 2016. "Exploring community structure in networks by consensus dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 450(C), pages 342-353.
    2. Fath, Brian D. & Halnes, Geir, 2007. "Cyclic energy pathways in ecological food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 17-24.
    3. Mary F. McGuire, 2014. "Pancreatic Cancer: Insights from Counterterrorism Theories," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 265-276, December.
    4. Jihui Han & Wei Li & Longfeng Zhao & Zhu Su & Yijiang Zou & Weibing Deng, 2017. "Community detection in dynamic networks via adaptive label propagation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Liu, Yan & Mei, Jingling & Li, Wenxue, 2018. "Stochastic stabilization problem of complex networks without strong connectedness," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 332(C), pages 304-315.
    6. Nonaka, Etsuko & Kuparinen, Anna, 2023. "Limited effects of size-selective harvesting and harvesting-induced life-history changes on the temporal variability of biomass dynamics in complex food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    7. Sabine Dritz & Rebecca A. Nelson & Fernanda S. Valdovinos, 2023. "The role of intra-guild indirect interactions in assembling plant-pollinator networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. de la Haye, Kayla & Robins, Garry & Mohr, Philip & Wilson, Carlene, 2011. "How physical activity shapes, and is shaped by, adolescent friendships," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(5), pages 719-728, September.
    9. Scotti, Marco & Bondavalli, Cristina & Bodini, Antonio, 2009. "Linking trophic positions and flow structure constraints in ecological networks: Energy transfer efficiency or topology effect?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(21), pages 3070-3080.
    10. Jalili, Mahdi, 2011. "Synchronizability of dynamical scale-free networks subject to random errors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4588-4595.
    11. Daniel M. Perkins & Ian A. Hatton & Benoit Gauzens & Andrew D. Barnes & David Ott & Benjamin Rosenbaum & Catarina Vinagre & Ulrich Brose, 2022. "Consistent predator-prey biomass scaling in complex food webs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    12. Jalili, Mahdi, 2011. "Error and attack tolerance of small-worldness in complex networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 422-430.
    13. Checco, Paolo & Biey, Mario & Kocarev, Ljupco, 2008. "Synchronization in random networks with given expected degree sequences," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 562-577.
    14. Liu, Wei-Chung & Chen, Hsuan-Wien & Tsai, Tsung-Hsi & Hwang, Hsien-Kuei, 2012. "A fish tank model for assembling food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 166-175.
    15. Canelas, Joana Viana & Pereira, Henrique Miguel, 2022. "Impacts of land-use intensity on ecosystems stability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    16. Borrett, S.R. & Freeze, M.A., 2011. "Reconnecting environs to their environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2393-2403.
    17. Cao, Guangxi & Zhang, Qi & Li, Qingchen, 2017. "Causal relationship between the global foreign exchange market based on complex networks and entropy theory," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 36-44.
    18. Giacomini, Henrique Corrêa & De Marco, Paulo & Petrere, Miguel, 2009. "Exploring community assembly through an individual-based model for trophic interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 23-39.
    19. David William Shanafelt & Michel Loreau, 2018. "Stability trophic cascades in food chains," Post-Print hal-02097236, HAL.
    20. Lyudmila N. Zhichkina & Vladimir V. Nosov & Kirill A. Zhichkin, 2023. "Seasonal Population Dynamics and Harmfulness of Wheat Thrips in Agrocenoses of Grain Crops," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:22:p:3133-3140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.