IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v26y1998i4p530-565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Latent Class Models

Author

Listed:
  • ANTON K. FORMANN

    (University of Vienna)

  • THOMAS KOHLMANN

    (Medical University of Lübeck, Germany)

Abstract

Linear logistic latent class analysis (LCA) relates the item latent probabilities of LCA to basic parameters representing the effects of explanatory variables. Applications of this model to dichotomous data comprise paired comparisons (the compared objects are the explanatory variables); the measurement of change due to, for example, therapeutic interventions (the treatments are the explanatory variables); simple scaling models of the Rasch type (the item difficulties and the person abilities are the explanatory variables); and similar models that try to explain the item difficulties by a hypothesized item structure (the cognitive operations needed to solve the items are the explanatory variables). The two latter types of models approximate the Rasch model and the linear logistic test model (LLTM), respectively, and become equivalent to these models for a sufficiently large number of classes. The same principle of semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation allows one to approximate the mixed Rasch model with its class-specific item difficulties and the mixed LLTM with its class-specific operation difficulties. Generalizations of linear logistic LCA include models for dichotomous items having varying discriminatory power and/or being affected by guessing (three-parameter linear logistic LCA) and models for the analysis of polytomous data.

Suggested Citation

  • Anton K. Formann & Thomas Kohlmann, 1998. "Structural Latent Class Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 26(4), pages 530-565, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:26:y:1998:i:4:p:530-565
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124198026004005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124198026004005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124198026004005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Dayton & George Macready, 1980. "A scaling model with response errors and intrinsically unscalable respondents," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(3), pages 343-356, September.
    2. Clifford Clogg & Leo Goodman, 1986. "On scaling models applied to data from several groups," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 123-135, March.
    3. Jürgen Rost, 1988. "Rating scale analysis with latent class models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(3), pages 327-348, September.
    4. Dean Follmann, 1988. "Consistent estimation in the rasch model based on nonparametric margins," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(4), pages 553-562, December.
    5. C. Proctor, 1970. "A probabilistic formulation and statistical analysis of guttman scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(1), pages 73-78, March.
    6. Jürgen Rost, 1985. "A latent class model for rating data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 37-49, March.
    7. Vermunt, J.K., 1993. "lEM : Log-linear and event history analysis with missing data using the EM algorithm," WORC Paper 93.09.015/7, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    8. Robert Mislevy & Norman Verhelst, 1990. "Modeling item responses when different subjects employ different solution strategies," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 195-215, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anton K. Formann, 2003. "Latent Class Model Diagnosis from a Frequentist Point of View," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 189-196, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geoffrey Evans & Colin Mills, 1998. "Assessing the Cross-Sex Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Schema Using Log-linear Models with Latent Variables," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 275-296, August.
    2. Steven Andrew Culpepper, 2019. "An Exploratory Diagnostic Model for Ordinal Responses with Binary Attributes: Identifiability and Estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(4), pages 921-940, December.
    3. Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe‐Hesketh, 2007. "Latent Variable Modelling: A Survey," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 34(4), pages 712-745, December.
    4. Ulf Böckenholt & Ingo Böckenholt, 1991. "Constrained latent class analysis: Simultaneous classification and scaling of discrete choice data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 699-716, December.
    5. Anton K. Formann, 2003. "Latent Class Model Diagnosis from a Frequentist Point of View," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 189-196, March.
    6. Enzo Loner, 2016. "A new way of looking at old things. An application of Guttman errors analysis to the study of environmental concern," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 823-847, March.
    7. Sun-Joo Cho & Allan S. Cohen, 2010. "A Multilevel Mixture IRT Model With an Application to DIF," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(3), pages 336-370, June.
    8. Michael Gillespie & Elisabeth Tenvergert & Johannes Kingma, 1988. "Using Mokken methods to develop robust cross-national scales: American and West German attitudes toward abortion," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 181-203, April.
    9. David J. Hessen, 2023. "Fitting and Testing Log-Linear Subpopulation Models with Known Support," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 917-939, September.
    10. Dirven, H.J. & Fouarge, D.J.A.G., 1996. "Income mobility and deprivation dynamics among the elderly in Belgium and the Netherlands," WORC Paper 96.05.005/2, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    11. Liu, Yaohui & Zhan, Peida & Fu, Yanbin & Chen, Qipeng & Man, Kaiwen & Luo, Yikun, 2023. "Using a multi-strategy eye-tracking psychometric model to measure intelligence and identify cognitive strategy in Raven's advanced progressive matrices," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    12. Leonard J. Paas & Jeroen K. Vermunt & Tammo H. A. Bijmolt, 2007. "Discrete time, discrete state latent Markov modelling for assessing and predicting household acquisitions of financial products," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(4), pages 955-974, October.
    13. repec:jss:jstsof:37:i02 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Michela Gnaldi & Silvia Bacci & Thiemo Kunze & Samuel Greiff, 2020. "Students’ Complex Problem Solving Profiles," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(2), pages 469-501, June.
    15. Bolck, A. & Croon, M.A. & Hagenaars, J.A.P., 1998. "On the use of latent class scores in causal models for categorical variables," WORC Paper 98.07.005/7, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    16. Matthias Davier & Shelby Haberman, 2014. "Hierarchical Diagnostic Classification Models Morphing into Unidimensional ‘Diagnostic’ Classification Models—A Commentary," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 340-346, April.
    17. Artur Pokropek, 2016. "Grade of Membership Response Time Model for Detecting Guessing Behaviors," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(3), pages 300-325, June.
    18. Vermunt, J.K., 1994. "Causal log-linear modeling with missing data," WORC Paper 94.05.021/7, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    19. James W. Shockey, 1988. "Adjusting for Response Error in Panel Surveys," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 17(1), pages 65-92, August.
    20. Chun Wang & Gongjun Xu & Zhuoran Shang, 2018. "A Two-Stage Approach to Differentiating Normal and Aberrant Behavior in Computer Based Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 223-254, March.
    21. Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:26:y:1998:i:4:p:530-565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.