IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v20y1988i2p181-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Mokken methods to develop robust cross-national scales: American and West German attitudes toward abortion

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Gillespie
  • Elisabeth Tenvergert
  • Johannes Kingma

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Gillespie & Elisabeth Tenvergert & Johannes Kingma, 1988. "Using Mokken methods to develop robust cross-national scales: American and West German attitudes toward abortion," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 181-203, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:20:y:1988:i:2:p:181-203
    DOI: 10.1007/BF00302462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00302462
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF00302462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clifford Clogg & Leo Goodman, 1986. "On scaling models applied to data from several groups," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 123-135, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. F D Zinn & D A Henderson & J D Nystuen & W D Drake, 1992. "A Stochastic Cumulative Scaling Method Applied to Measuring Wealth in Indonesian Villages," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(8), pages 1155-1166, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geoffrey Evans & Colin Mills, 1998. "Assessing the Cross-Sex Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Schema Using Log-linear Models with Latent Variables," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 275-296, August.
    2. James W. Shockey, 1988. "Adjusting for Response Error in Panel Surveys," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 17(1), pages 65-92, August.
    3. McCutcheon, A.L., 1993. "Multi-sample latent logit models with polytomous effects variables," WORC Paper 93.08.014/7, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    4. Rolf Langeheine & Frank Van De Pol, 1990. "A Unifying Framework for Markov Modeling in Discrete Space and Discrete Time," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 18(4), pages 416-441, May.
    5. repec:jss:jstsof:42:i10 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. George Macready & C. Mitchell Dayton, 1992. "The application of latent class models in adaptive testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 71-88, March.
    7. Paul S. Albert & Lisa M. McShane & Joanna H. Shih, 2001. "Latent Class Modeling Approaches for Assessing Diagnostic Error without a Gold Standard: With Applications to p53 Immunohistochemical Assays in Bladder Tumors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 610-619, June.
    8. Anton K. Formann & Thomas Kohlmann, 1998. "Structural Latent Class Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 26(4), pages 530-565, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:20:y:1988:i:2:p:181-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.