IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v18y1990i4p416-441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Unifying Framework for Markov Modeling in Discrete Space and Discrete Time

Author

Listed:
  • ROLF LANGEHEINE

    (University of Kiel)

  • FRANK VAN DE POL

    (Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics)

Abstract

The focus of this article is on Markov models for the analysis of panel data and, more specifically, on data obtained from repeated measurements of one categorical variable at several consecutive points in time. We first review developments in the field that attack the two main problems of the simple Markov model. The Mixed Markov model extends the simple model by allowing for population heterogeneity; the Latent Markov model incorporates measurement error and latent change into the simple model. Second, we present the more general Latent Mixed Markov model and show how both the Mixed Markov model and the Latent Markov model, as well as several more specific models, relate to this more general model. Finally, we reanalyze the Los Angeles panel data on depression with a focus on stability and change.

Suggested Citation

  • Rolf Langeheine & Frank Van De Pol, 1990. "A Unifying Framework for Markov Modeling in Discrete Space and Discrete Time," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 18(4), pages 416-441, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:18:y:1990:i:4:p:416-441
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124190018004002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124190018004002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124190018004002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard B. Davies & Robert Crouchley, 1986. "The Mover-Stayer Model," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 14(4), pages 356-380, May.
    2. Clifford Clogg & Leo Goodman, 1986. "On scaling models applied to data from several groups," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 123-135, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dimitris Pavlopoulos & Ruud Muffels & Jeroen K. Vermunt, 2009. "Training and Low‐pay Mobility: The Case of the UK and the Netherlands," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 23(s1), pages 37-59, March.
    2. McDonough, Peggy & Worts, Diana & Sacker, Amanda, 2010. "Socioeconomic inequalities in health dynamics: A comparison of Britain and the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 251-260, January.
    3. Guglielmo D’Amico & Philippe Regnault, 2018. "Dynamic Measurement of Poverty: Modeling and Estimation," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 80(2), pages 305-340, November.
    4. Lee, Jae Hyun & Davis, Adam W. & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2017. "Triggers of behavioral change: Longitudinal analysis of travel behavior, household composition and spatial characteristics of the residence," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 4-21.
    5. We[beta]els, Holger & Von Eye, Alexander, 1996. "Using latent class analysis to detect behavioral patterns in systems of observational variables," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 321-331, November.
    6. Montfort, Kees van & Bijleveld, Catrien, 1997. "Dynamic analysis of multivariate panel data with nonlinear transformations," Serie Research Memoranda 0054, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Gillespie & Elisabeth Tenvergert & Johannes Kingma, 1988. "Using Mokken methods to develop robust cross-national scales: American and West German attitudes toward abortion," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 181-203, April.
    2. Geoffrey Evans & Colin Mills, 1998. "Assessing the Cross-Sex Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Schema Using Log-linear Models with Latent Variables," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 275-296, August.
    3. James W. Shockey, 1988. "Adjusting for Response Error in Panel Surveys," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 17(1), pages 65-92, August.
    4. McCutcheon, A.L., 1993. "Multi-sample latent logit models with polytomous effects variables," WORC Paper 93.08.014/7, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    5. Oskrochi, G. R. & Davies, R. B., 1997. "Stayers in mixed Markov renewal models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 453-464, September.
    6. repec:jss:jstsof:42:i10 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. George Macready & C. Mitchell Dayton, 1992. "The application of latent class models in adaptive testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 71-88, March.
    8. Paul S. Albert & Lisa M. McShane & Joanna H. Shih, 2001. "Latent Class Modeling Approaches for Assessing Diagnostic Error without a Gold Standard: With Applications to p53 Immunohistochemical Assays in Bladder Tumors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 610-619, June.
    9. Anton K. Formann & Thomas Kohlmann, 1998. "Structural Latent Class Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 26(4), pages 530-565, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:18:y:1990:i:4:p:416-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.