IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v18y1989i1p126-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grade of Membership Analysis of Depression-Related Psychiatric Disorders

Author

Listed:
  • MAX A. WOODBURY

    (Duke University)

  • KENNETH G. MANTON

    (Duke University)

Abstract

Information on 7,184 respondents of the Duke University and Johns Hopkins University Epidemiologic Catchment Areas (ECA) studies were analyzed using a fuzzy set classification procedure called Grade of Membership (GoM) analysis. A formal description of GoM analysis and its relationship to other multivariate procedures, some of which are described in other articles in this issue, is provided. Symptoms were selected for analysis that represented seven clinically defined psychiatric disorders: depression, generalized anxiety, panic disorder, simple phobia, social phobia, agoraphobia, and somatization. In the sample there were persons who expressed symptoms for these diseases as well as a large group of persons free of any symptoms. In the GoM analyses, we used both the 41 symptom variables initially provided to define disorder groups and a derivative set of 33 symptom variables with certain of the original symptoms grouped to increase the stability of symptom sets. In the analysis it was found that six pure types best explained the variation of both the sets of 41 and 33 symptoms. The structure of the 33 variable set provided a better identification of the underlying disease groups. The six pure types that emerged from the 33 variable analysis were identified as depression, generalized anxiety, phobias, somatization, and two groups that were initially classified as asymptomatic persons. One of these groups was clearly asymptomatic and the other possessed only mild symptoms not strongly indicative of any of the disorders. This group may represent a neurotic subpopulation. Perhaps a surprising result was the failure for panic to emerge as a separate disorder but instead to be associated with generalized anxiety. The failure to identify the phobias as separate disorders may be attributable to the small number of variables used to define them. In a previous analysis using a larger set of variables, simple and social phobias clearly separated.

Suggested Citation

  • Max A. Woodbury & Kenneth G. Manton, 1989. "Grade of Membership Analysis of Depression-Related Psychiatric Disorders," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 18(1), pages 126-163, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:18:y:1989:i:1:p:126-163
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124189018001005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124189018001005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124189018001005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Heckman & B. Singer, 1984. "The Identifiability of the Proportional Hazard Model," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 51(2), pages 231-241.
    2. Bengt Muthén & Anders Christoffersson, 1981. "Simultaneous factor analysis of dichotomous variables in several groups," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 407-419, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimiliano Bratti & Konstantinos Tatsiramos, 2012. "The effect of delaying motherhood on the second childbirth in Europe," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 291-321, January.
    2. Pierre Dubois & Alain de Janvry & Elisabeth Sadoulet, 2012. "Effects on School Enrollment and Performance of a Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Mexico," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(3), pages 555-589.
    3. Eil, David & Lien, Jaimie W., 2014. "Staying ahead and getting even: Risk attitudes of experienced poker players," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 50-69.
    4. NAGORE GARCIA Amparo, 2017. "Gender Differences in Unemployment Dynamics and Initial Wages over the Business Cycle," LISER Working Paper Series 2017-06, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    5. Amparo Nagore García & Arthur van Soest, 2017. "New job matches and their stability before and during the crisis," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(7), pages 975-995, October.
    6. Giovanni Compiani & Yuichi Kitamura, 2016. "Using mixtures in econometric models: a brief review and some new results," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 19(3), pages 95-127, October.
    7. James J. Heckman & Christopher R. Taber, 1994. "Econometric Mixture Models and More General Models for Unobservables in Duration Analysis," NBER Technical Working Papers 0157, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. David MARGOLIS, 2008. "Unemployment Insurance Versus Individual Unemployment Accounts and Transitions to Formal Versus Informal Sector Jobs," Working Papers 2008-35, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    9. J. Ignacio García-Pérez & Yolanda F. Rebollo Sanz, 2009. "The use of permanent contracts across Spanish regions: Do regional wage subsidies work?," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 33(1), pages 97-130, January.
    10. Mark Agee & Thomas Crocker, 2008. "Does parents’ valuation of children’s health mimic their valuation of own health?," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 231-249, January.
    11. Nagore García, Amparo & van Soest, Arthur, 2022. "Joint retirement behaviour and pension reform in the Netherlands," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    12. Andreas I. Mueller & Johannes Spinnewijn & Giorgio Topa, 2021. "Job Seekers' Perceptions and Employment Prospects: Heterogeneity, Duration Dependence, and Bias," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(1), pages 324-363, January.
    13. Govert Ewout Bijwaard, 2014. "Multistate event history analysis with frailty," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 30(58), pages 1591-1620.
    14. Bijwaard, Govert, 2021. "Educational Differences in Mortality and Hospitalisation for Cardiovascular Diseases for Males," IZA Discussion Papers 14507, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Pando-Garcia, Julián & Periañez-Cañadillas, Iñaki & Charterina, Jon, 2016. "Business simulation games with and without supervision: An analysis based on the TAM model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1731-1736.
    16. Laura Pilossoph & Gregor Jarosch, 2014. "Hiring Practices, Duration Dependence, and Long-Term Unemployment," 2014 Meeting Papers 1256, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    17. Matzkin, Rosa L., 2012. "Identification in nonparametric limited dependent variable models with simultaneity and unobserved heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 106-115.
    18. Lafuente Ruiz de Sabando, Amaia & Forcada Sainz, Francisco Javier & Zorrilla Calvo, María Pilar, 2018. "The university image: a model of overall image and stakeholder perspectives," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    19. Bijwaard, Govert, 2011. "Unobserved Heterogeneity in Multiple-Spell Multiple-States Duration Models," IZA Discussion Papers 5748, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Giuliano, Laura & Levine, David I. & Leonard, Jonathan, 2006. "Do Race, Age, and Gender Differences Affect Manager-Employee Relations? An Analysis of Quits, Dismissals, and Promotions at a Large Retail Firm," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt9tc8n5j7, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:18:y:1989:i:1:p:126-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.